PO6 The Engineer and Society (ESSE) - Apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice and solutions to complex engineering problems; LO1 To internalizes the roles as responsible engineers towards Creator and society PO8 Ethics (ESSE) – Apply professional ethics with islamic values and commit to responsibilities and norms of professional engineering code of ethics LO3 To demonstrate ethical principles in leadership, behavior and character with continuous self- development By using the 7 steps method - Please evaluate the case. Questions False Trip Report. A Senior Design Engineer and a Senior Fabrication Engineer scheduled a trip to review a very complex tool for an injection molded part at the supplier's plant. They had been there on previous occasions over a span of many months. This complex long lead part was being developed with early supplier involvement. The Senior Design Engineer was first to turn in his trip report, and his manager noticed that the hotel bill was for a double room. He called the manager of the other engineer to see if he also charged for a room and to see if it was for the same room. Both were known to enjoy their time in cafe and the thought was that they might have shared a room and double billed it to work around the daily expense limit on food. When the other expense report came in, it was for a different room number. It was also for a double room. The design manager then called the supplier to ask a technical question about the tool related to the trip report in an attempt to see if the supplier might make some remark that would shed some light on the issue. To his surprise, the supplier stated there had been no review of the tool. He stated that two weeks prior to the trip he asked the two engineers to reschedule the tool inspection since a competitor company was in-plant for a tool tryout. He further stated that the only contact was a brief status meeting in the hotel coffee shop. The design manager then confronted his engineer with the information he had gathered and asked for an explanation. The engineer immediately broke down and stated they had made plans to visit with some women they met on a previous trip and therefore did not change the date of the visit as requested by the supplier. He resigned on the spot. Since he was married, he did not want an investigation.

Management, Loose-Leaf Version
13th Edition
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:Richard L. Daft
Chapter10: Designing Organization Structure
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 3ED
icon
Related questions
Question
PO6 The Engineer and Society (ESSE) - Apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice and solutions to complex engineering problems; LO1 To internalizes the roles as responsible engineers towards Creator and society PO8 Ethics (ESSE) – Apply professional ethics with islamic values and commit to responsibilities and norms of professional engineering code of ethics LO3 To demonstrate ethical principles in leadership, behavior and character with continuous self- development By using the 7 steps method - Please evaluate the case. Questions False Trip Report. A Senior Design Engineer and a Senior Fabrication Engineer scheduled a trip to review a very complex tool for an injection molded part at the supplier's plant. They had been there on previous occasions over a span of many months. This complex long lead part was being developed with early supplier involvement. The Senior Design Engineer was first to turn in his trip report, and his manager noticed that the hotel bill was for a double room. He called the manager of the other engineer to see if he also charged for a room and to see if it was for the same room. Both were known to enjoy their time in cafe and the thought was that they might have shared a room and double billed it to work around the daily expense limit on food. When the other expense report came in, it was for a different room number. It was also for a double room. The design manager then called the supplier to ask a technical question about the tool related to the trip report in an attempt to see if the supplier might make some remark that would shed some light on the issue. To his surprise, the supplier stated there had been no review of the tool. He stated that two weeks prior to the trip he asked the two engineers to reschedule the tool inspection since a competitor company was in-plant for a tool tryout. He further stated that the only contact was a brief status meeting in the hotel coffee shop. The design manager then confronted his engineer with the information he had gathered and asked for an explanation. The engineer immediately broke down and stated they had made plans to visit with some women they met on a previous trip and therefore did not change the date of the visit as requested by the supplier. He resigned on the spot. Since he was married, he did not want an investigation.
By using the 7 steps method - Please evaluate the case.
Questions
False Trip Report. A Senior Design Engineer and a Senior Fabrication Engineer scheduled a trip
to review a very complex tool for an injection molded part at the supplier's plant. They had been
there on previous occasions over a span of many months. This complex long lead part was being
developed with early supplier involvement.
The Senior Design Engineer was first to turn in his trip report, and his manager noticed that the
hotel bill was for a double room. He called the manager of the other engineer to see if he also
charged for a room and to see if it was for the same room. Both were known to enjoy their time in
cafe and the thought was that they might have shared a room and double billed it to work around
the daily expense limit on food. When the other expense report came in, it was for a different room
number. It was also for a double room.
The design manager then called the supplier to ask a technical question about the tool related to
the trip report in an attempt to see if the supplier might make some remark that would shed some
light on the issue. To his surprise, the supplier stated there had been no review of the tool. He
stated that two weeks prior to the trip he asked the two engineers to reschedule the tool inspection
since a competitor company was in-plant for a tool tryout. He further stated that the only contact
was a brief status meeting in the hotel coffee shop. The design manager then confronted his
engineer with the information he had gathered and asked for an explanation.
The engineer immediately broke down and stated they had made plans to visit with some women
they met on a previous trip and therefore did not change the date of the visit as requested by the
supplier. He resigned on the spot. Since he was married, he did not want an investigation.
Transcribed Image Text:By using the 7 steps method - Please evaluate the case. Questions False Trip Report. A Senior Design Engineer and a Senior Fabrication Engineer scheduled a trip to review a very complex tool for an injection molded part at the supplier's plant. They had been there on previous occasions over a span of many months. This complex long lead part was being developed with early supplier involvement. The Senior Design Engineer was first to turn in his trip report, and his manager noticed that the hotel bill was for a double room. He called the manager of the other engineer to see if he also charged for a room and to see if it was for the same room. Both were known to enjoy their time in cafe and the thought was that they might have shared a room and double billed it to work around the daily expense limit on food. When the other expense report came in, it was for a different room number. It was also for a double room. The design manager then called the supplier to ask a technical question about the tool related to the trip report in an attempt to see if the supplier might make some remark that would shed some light on the issue. To his surprise, the supplier stated there had been no review of the tool. He stated that two weeks prior to the trip he asked the two engineers to reschedule the tool inspection since a competitor company was in-plant for a tool tryout. He further stated that the only contact was a brief status meeting in the hotel coffee shop. The design manager then confronted his engineer with the information he had gathered and asked for an explanation. The engineer immediately broke down and stated they had made plans to visit with some women they met on a previous trip and therefore did not change the date of the visit as requested by the supplier. He resigned on the spot. Since he was married, he did not want an investigation.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:
9781305969308
Author:
Richard L. Daft
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub