Current Attempt in ProgressInformation for 2020 follows for Bramble Corp.:Retained earnings, January 1, 2020Sales revenueCost of goods soldInterest incomeSelling and administrative expensesUnrealized gain on FV-OCI equity investments (gains/losses not recycled)Loss on impairment of goodwillIncome tax on continuing operations for 2020 (assume this is correct)Assessment for additional income tax for 2018 (normal, recurring, and not caused by an error)Gain on disposal of FV-NI investmentsLoss from flood damageLoss on disposal of discontinued division (net of tax of $66,000)Loss from operation of discontinued division (net of tax of $40,250)Dividends declared on common sharesDividends declared on preferred shares$2,020,00036,800,00028,734,000162,0004,650,000281,000494,000661,400573,000103,000374,000264,000161,000286,50060,600Bramble decided to discontinue its entire wholesale division (a major line of business) and to keep its manufacturing division. OnSeptember 15, it sold the wholesale division to Dylane Corp. During 2020, there were 500,000 common shares outstanding all year.Bramble's tax rate is 20% on operating income and all gains and losses (use this rate where the tax provisions are not given). Brambleprepares financial statements in accordance with IFRS.Prepare a multiple-step statement of financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2020, showing expenses by function.Include calculation of EPS. (Round EPS answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 52.75.) Bramble Corp.Statement of Financial PerformanceVItems that will not be reclassified subsequently to net income or loss:V$$UUU

The multi-step income statement is the type of format of Income statement (financial statement)…

Prepare a multiple-step statement of financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2020, showing expenses by function. Include calculation of EPS. (Round EPS answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 52.75.)

Prepare a multiple-step statement of financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2020, showing expenses by function. Include calculation of EPS. (Round EPS answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 52.75.)

Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation

8th Edition

ISBN:9781285190907

Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Chapter6: Accounting Quality

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2IC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Brooks Company reported a prior period adjustment of 512,000 in pretax financial "income" and taxable income for 2020. The prior period adjustment was the result of an error in calculating bad debt expense for 2019. The current tax rate is 30%, and no change in the tax rate has been enacted for future years. When the company applies intraperiod income tax allocation, the prior period adjustment will be shown on the: a. income statement at 12,000 b. income statement at 8,400 (net of 3,600 income taxes) c. retained earnings statement at 12,000 d. retained earnings statement at 8,400 (net of 3,600 income taxes)
In 2020, Frost Company, which began operations in 2018, decided to change from LIFO to FIFO because management believed that FIFO belter represented the flow of their inventory. Management prepared the following analysis showing the effect of this change: Frost reported net income of 2,500,000, 2,400,000, and 2,100,000 in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. The tax rate is 21%. Required: 1. Prepare the journal entry necessary to record the change. 2. What amount of net income would Frost report in 2018, 2019, and 2020? 3. If Frosts employees received a bonus of 10% of income before deducting the bonus and income taxes in 2018 and 2019, what would be the effect on net income for 2018, 2019, and 2020?
Misclassifications Olson Companys bookkeeper prepared the following income statement and retained earnings statement for the year ended December 31, 2019: The preceding account balances are correct but have been incorrectly classified in certain instances. Assume the income tax amounts are correct and linked to the appropriate items. Required: Prepare a corrected 2019 multiple-step income statement and a retained earnings statement. Before preparing the 2019 retained earnings statement, determine the correct balance as of the beginning of the year.
Dudley Company failed to recognize the following accruals. It also recorded the prepaid expenses and unearned revenues as expenses and revenues, respectively', in the following year when paid or collected. The reported pretax income was 20,000 in 2018, 25,000 in 2019, and 23,000 in 2020. Required: 1. Compute the correct pretax income for 2018, 2019, and 2020. 2. Prepare the journal entries necessary in 2020 if the errors are discovered at the end of that year. Ignore income taxes. 3. Prepare the journal entries necessary in 2021 if the errors are discovered at the end of that year. Ignore income taxes.
Shannon Corporation began operations on January 1, 2019. Financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, contained the following errors: In addition, on December 31, 2020, fully depreciated machinery was sold for 10,800 cash, but the sale was not recorded until 2021. There were no other errors during 2019 or 2020, and no corrections have been made for any of the errors. Refer to the information for Shannon Corporation above. Ignoring income taxes, what is the total effect of the errors on the amount of working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) at December 31, 2020? a. working capital overstated by 4,200 b. working capital understated by 5,800 c. working capital understated by 6,000 d. working capital understated by 9,800
Comprehensive Colt Company reports pretax financial income of 143,000 in 2019. In addition to pretax income from continuing operations (of which revenues are 295,000), the following items are included in this pretax income: Colts taxable income totals 93,000 in 2019. The difference between the pretax financial income and the taxable income is due to the excess of tax depreciation over financial depreciation on assets used in continuing operations. At the beginning of 2019, Colt had a retained earnings balance of 310.000 and a deferred tax liability of 8,100. During 2019, Colt declared and paid dividends of 48,000. It is subject to tax rates of 15% on the first 50,000 of income and 30% on income in excess of 50,000. Based on proper interperiod tax allocation procedures, Colt has determined that its 2019 ending deferred tax liability is 14,100. Required: 1. Prepare a schedule for Colt to allocate the total 2019 income tax expense to the various components of pretax income. 2. Prepare Colts income tax journal entry at the end of 2019. 3. Prepare Colts 2019 income statement. 4. Prepare Colts 2019 statement of retained earnings. 5. Show the related income tax disclosures on Colts December 31, 2019, balance sheet.
Elegant Linens uses the balance sheet aging method to account for uncollectible debt on receivables. The following is the past-due category information for outstanding receivable debt for 2019. To manage earnings more favorably, Elegant Linens considers changing the past-due categories as follows. A. Complete each table by filling in the blanks. B. Determine the difference between total uncollectible. C. Complete the following 2019 comparative income statements for 2019, showing net income changes as a result of the changes to the balance sheet aging method categories. D. Describe the categories change effect on net income and accounts receivable.
Jacob, Inc., changed from the average cost to the FIFO cost flow assumption in 2019. The increase in the prior year's income before taxes is €1,100,000. The tax rate is 35%. Jacob's 2019 journal entry to record the change in accounting policy will include. a. a debit to Retained Earnings for €1,100,000. b. a credit to Retained Earnings for €1,100,000. a debit to Inventory for €715,000. C. a credit to Deferred Tax Liability for €385,000
Lindemax Inc. reports the following pretax income (loss) for both financial reporting purposes and tax purposes. (Assume the carryback provision is used for a net operating loss.) The tax rates listed were all enacted by the beginning of 2018. Instructions a) Prepare the journal entries for 2020 and 2021, assuming that based on the weight of available evidence, it is probable that one-fourth of the benefits of the loss carryforward will not be realized.
During the preparation of financial statement for Master Ltd for 2023 it was discovered thatan amount of $22,000, incurred in September 2021 and payable to an overseas supplier, wasoverlooked and not paid or provided for in the financial statement ending 30 June 2022. Theamount is considered to be material and will be permitted as a deduction for tax purposes(tax rate 30%).Required:i) Prepare the necessary journal entry to correct this error.
(NOL Carryback and Carryforward, Valuation Account Needed) Meyer reported the following pretax financial income (loss) for the years 2015–2019. 2015 $240,000 2016 350,000 2017 120,000 2018 (570,000) 2019 180,000 Pretax financial income (loss) and taxable income (loss) were the same for all years involved. The enacted tax rate was 34% for 2015 and 2016, and 40% for 2017–2019. Assume the carryback provision is used first for net operating losses.Instructions(a) Prepare the journal entries for the years 2017–2019 to record income tax expense, income taxes payable (refundable), and the tax effects of the loss carryback and loss carryforward, assuming that based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that one-fifth of the benefits of the loss carryforward will not be realized.(b) Prepare the income tax section of the 2018 income statement beginning with the line “Income (loss) before income taxes.”
x Company reports the following pretax income (loss) for both book and tax purposes. Year. Pretax income tax rate 2018 120,000 20% 2019 93,000 20% 2020. (82,000) 25% 2021 110,000 25% The tax rates listed were enacted by the beginning of 2018 Prepare the journal entries for years 2018-2021 to record income tax expense (benefit) and income taxes payable and the tax effects of the loss carryforward assuming that based on the weight of available evidence it is more likely than not that one half of the benefits of the loss carryforward will not be realized.