Professor Wendy Smith has been offered the following opportunity: A law firm would like to retain her for an upfront payment of $49,000. In return, for the next year the firm would have access to eight hours of her time every month. As an alternative payment arrangement, the firm would pay Professor Smith's hourly rate for the eight hours each month. Smith's rate is $535 per hour and her opportunity cost of capital is 15% per year What does the IRR rule advise regarding the payment arrangement? (Hint: Find the monthly rate that will yield an effective annual rate of 15%.) What about the NPV rule? The annual IRR is % (Round to two decimal places

Professor Wendy Smith has been offered the following opportunity: A law firm would like to retain her for an upfront payment of $49,000. In return, for the next year the firm would have access to eight hours of her time every month. As an alternative payment arrangement, the firm would pay Professor Smith's hourly rate for the eight hours each month. Smith's rate is $535 per hour and her opportunity cost of capital is 15% per year What does the IRR rule advise regarding the payment arrangement? (Hint: Find the monthly rate that will yield an effective annual rate of 15%.) What about the NPV rule? The annual IRR is % (Round to two decimal places

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357110362

Author:Murphy

Publisher:Murphy

Chapter7: Losses—deductions And Limitations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 92TPC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Now assume that it is several years later. The brothers are concerned about the firm’s current credit terms of net 30, which means that contractors buying building products from the firm are not offered a discount and are supposed to pay the full amount in 30 days. Gross sales are now running $1,000,000 a year, and 80% (by dollar volume) of the firm’s paying customers generally pay the full amount on Day 30; the other 20% pay, on average, on Day 40. Of the firm’s gross sales, 2% ends up as bad-debt losses. The brothers are now considering a change in the firm’s credit policy. The change would entail: (1) changing the credit terms to 2/10, net 20, (2) employing stricter credit standards before granting credit, and (3) enforcing collections with greater vigor than in the past. Thus, cash customers and those paying within 10 days would receive a 2% discount, but all others would have to pay the full amount after only 20 days. The brothers believe the discount would both attract additional customers and encourage some existing customers to purchase more from the firm—after all, the discount amounts to a price reduction. Of course, these customers would take the discount and hence would pay in only 10 days. The net expected result is for sales to increase to $1,100,000; for 60% of the paying customers to take the discount and pay on the 10th day; for 30% to pay the full amount on Day 20; for 10% to pay late on Day 30; and for bad-debt losses to fall from 2% to 1% of gross sales. The firm’s operating cost ratio will remain unchanged at 75%, and its cost of carrying receivables will remain unchanged at 12%. To begin the analysis, describe the four variables that make up a firm’s credit policy and explain how each of them affects sales and collections.
Professor Wendy Smith has been offered the following opportunity: A law firm would like to retain her for an upfront payment of $50,000. In return, for the next year the firm would have access to eight hours of her time every month. As an alternative payment arrangement, the firm would pay Professor Smith's hourly rate for the eight hours each month. Smith's rate is $545 per hour and her opportunity cost of capital is 13% per year. What does the IRR rule advise regarding the payment arrangement? (Hint. Find the monthly rate that will yield an effective annual rate of 13%.) What about the NPV rule? The annual IRR is 10.15%. (Round to two decimal places.) Find the annual rate
Professor Wendy Smith has been offered the following opportunity: A law firm would like to retain her for an upfront payment of $ 50 comma 000. In return, for the next year the firm would have access to eight hours of her time every month. As an alternative payment arrangement, the firm would pay Professor Smith's hourly rate for the eight hours each month. Smith's rate is $ 540 per hour and her opportunity cost of capital is 15 % per year. What does the IRR rule advise regarding the payment arrangement? (Hint: Find the monthly rate that will yield an effective annual rate of 15 %.) What about the NPV rule?
Professor Wendy Smith has been offered the following deal: A law firm would like to retain her for an upfront payment of $50,000. In return, for the next year, the firm would have access to 8 hours of her time every month. Smith’s rate is $550 per hour and her opportunity cost of capital is 15% (EAR). What does the IRR rule advise regarding this opportunity? What about the NPV rule?
Professor Brad has been offered the following opportunity: A law firm would like to retain his for an upfront payment of $50000. In return, for the next year the firm would have access to eight hours of his time every month. As an alternative payment arrangement, the firm would pay Professor Brad's hourly rate for the eight hours each month. Brad's rate is $535 per hour and her opportunity cost of capital is 13 % per year. What does the IRR rule advise regarding the payment arrangement? (Hint: Find the monthly rate that will yield an effective annual rate of 13 %.) What about the NPV rule? A. What is the IRR?
Professor Wendy Smith has been offered the following deal: A law firm would like to retain her for an upfront payment of $ 58 comma 000. In return, for the next year, the firm would have access to 8 hours of her time every month. Smith's rate is $ 627 per hour, and her opportunity cost of capital is 16% (equivalent annual rate, EAR). What is the IRR (annual)? What does the IRR rule advise regarding this opportunity? What is the NPV? What does the NPV rule say about this opportunity?
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $4,760 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial $1,190 investment of plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $5,950 What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is per year? Should Marian take it? What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 2.4% per year? The NPV of this opportunity is $ (Round to the nearest cent.)
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $4,600 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $1,150 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $5,750. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 1.9%per year? Should Marian take it? What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is per year?
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $16,000 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $4,000 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $20,000. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 3% per year? Should Marian take it? The NPV of this opportunity is $____ (Round to the nearest dollar.)
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $5,440 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $1,360 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $6,800. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 1.6% per year? Should Marian take it?
Carl Hightop, a popular basketball player, has been offered a four-year salary deal. He can either accept $4,000,000 now or accept monthly amounts of $90,000 payable at the end of each month. If money can be invested at 3.4% compounded quarterly, which option is the better option for Carl and by how much?
marian plunket owners her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $32,000 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $8,000 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $40,000. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 8% per year? Should marian take it?