Q3) A common technique for determining ratios of viable versus non-viable cells after a particular treatment is to use cell-impermeable and cell-permeable dyes. As cells undergo different processes of cell death (apoptosis, necrosis, pyroptosis, etc.) the integrity of the cellular membrane degrades, which allows cell-impermeable dyes to penetrate while viable cells in the population will continue to exclude the dye. Examples of commonly used cell-impermeable dyes are propidium iodide (PI), ethidium bromide (EtBr), 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) and trypan blue. DNA-intercalating cell-permeable dyes include Hoescht, 4',6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI), and DRAQ5. Your Pl asks you to design an experiment using an old stock of cells that have been stored in liquid nitrogen for the past 5 years. The cells were frozen down using a generic freezing media consisting of 20% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO) in fetal bovine serum (FBS). Because the cells have been frozen for an extended period and you are unsure about how they were originally handled, you decide to play it safe and plate out some extra cells for a pilot experiment to assess viability before starting the larger, more important experiment. You thaw the cells at 37°C and immediately plate into 4 different flasks, 1 flask for the larger experiment and 3 flasks to assess viability at different time-points - immediately out of storage, 1 hr post- thaw, and 24 hr post-thaw. At each of the time-points, you take a sample of cells, dye with Pl, and then assess whether each cell is Pl positive or Pl negative. Your results appear as follows. immediately out of storage: 90% of cells are positive for Pl at 1 hr post-thaw: 70% of cells are positive for Pl at 24 hr post-thaw: 6% of cells are positive for Pl (A) Describe exactly/literally what the data is demonstrating (Don't make interpretative jumps). (B) How should you proceed? Choose the best answer and justify your answer choice based on the data provided. a. Scrap the cells because they are too damaged. b. Start a different vial of cells and perform the viability experiment again - maybe it was just a bad vial of cells. c. The cells are fine - proceed with the larger experiment. (C) Define a confounding variable. Is there a confounding variable within your experimental design that could be influencing the high Plt count? mis tu

Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
4th Edition
ISBN:9781305389892
Author:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Publisher:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Chapter10: Cell Division And Mitosis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2ITD
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
W
Q3)
A common technique for determining ratios of viable versus non-viable cells after a particular
treatment is to use cell-impermeable and cell-permeable dyes. As cells undergo different
processes of cell death (apoptosis, necrosis, pyroptosis, etc.) the integrity of the cellular
membrane degrades, which allows cell-impermeable dyes to penetrate while viable cells in the
population will continue to exclude the dye. Examples of commonly used cell-impermeable
dyes are propidium iodide (PI), ethidium bromide (EtBr), 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) and
trypan blue. DNA-intercalating cell-permeable dyes include Hoescht, 4',6-diamidino-2-
phenylindole (DAPI), and DRAQ5.
Your Pl asks you to design an experiment using an old stock of cells that have been stored in
liquid nitrogen for the past 5 years. The cells were frozen down using a generic freezing media
consisting of 20% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO) in fetal bovine serum (FBS).
Because the cells have been frozen for an extended period and you are unsure about how they
were originally handled, you decide to play it safe and plate out some extra cells for a pilot
experiment to assess viability before starting the larger, more important experiment. You thaw
the cells at 37°C and immediately plate into 4 different flasks, 1 flask for the larger experiment
and 3 flasks to assess viability at different time-points – immediately out of storage, 1 hr post-
thaw, and 24 hr post-thaw. At each of the time-points, you take a sample of cells, dve with PI,
and then assess whether each cell is Pl positive or Pl negative. Your results appear as follows.
immediately out of storage: 90% of cells are positive for Pl
at 1 hr post-thaw: 70% of cells are positive for Pl
at 24 hr post-thaw: 6% of cells are positive for Pl
(A) Describe exactly/literally what the data is demonstrating (Don't make interpretative
jumps).
(B) How should you proceed? Choose the best answer and justify your answer choice based
on the data provided.
ARBE
a. Scrap the cells because they are too damaged.
b. Start a different vial of cells and perform the viability experiment again - maybe
it was just a bad vial of cells.
The cells are fine - proceed with the larger experiment.
(C) Define a confounding variable. Is there a confounding variable within your experimental
design that could be influencing the high Plt count?
Transcribed Image Text:W Q3) A common technique for determining ratios of viable versus non-viable cells after a particular treatment is to use cell-impermeable and cell-permeable dyes. As cells undergo different processes of cell death (apoptosis, necrosis, pyroptosis, etc.) the integrity of the cellular membrane degrades, which allows cell-impermeable dyes to penetrate while viable cells in the population will continue to exclude the dye. Examples of commonly used cell-impermeable dyes are propidium iodide (PI), ethidium bromide (EtBr), 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) and trypan blue. DNA-intercalating cell-permeable dyes include Hoescht, 4',6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI), and DRAQ5. Your Pl asks you to design an experiment using an old stock of cells that have been stored in liquid nitrogen for the past 5 years. The cells were frozen down using a generic freezing media consisting of 20% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO) in fetal bovine serum (FBS). Because the cells have been frozen for an extended period and you are unsure about how they were originally handled, you decide to play it safe and plate out some extra cells for a pilot experiment to assess viability before starting the larger, more important experiment. You thaw the cells at 37°C and immediately plate into 4 different flasks, 1 flask for the larger experiment and 3 flasks to assess viability at different time-points – immediately out of storage, 1 hr post- thaw, and 24 hr post-thaw. At each of the time-points, you take a sample of cells, dve with PI, and then assess whether each cell is Pl positive or Pl negative. Your results appear as follows. immediately out of storage: 90% of cells are positive for Pl at 1 hr post-thaw: 70% of cells are positive for Pl at 24 hr post-thaw: 6% of cells are positive for Pl (A) Describe exactly/literally what the data is demonstrating (Don't make interpretative jumps). (B) How should you proceed? Choose the best answer and justify your answer choice based on the data provided. ARBE a. Scrap the cells because they are too damaged. b. Start a different vial of cells and perform the viability experiment again - maybe it was just a bad vial of cells. The cells are fine - proceed with the larger experiment. (C) Define a confounding variable. Is there a confounding variable within your experimental design that could be influencing the high Plt count?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Gene expression
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
Biology
ISBN:
9781305389892
Author:
Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Microbiology for Surgical Technologists (MindTap …
Microbiology for Surgical Technologists (MindTap …
Biology
ISBN:
9781111306663
Author:
Margaret Rodriguez, Paul Price
Publisher:
Cengage Learning