Please answer the subparts only:• advantages and disadvantages • best solution• conclusion Case Study for STAFFINGChoosing a ManagerThe director of management development for the Long Stay Suites was required to recommendsomeone for a high-level management position in the company. Careful screening of all presentemployees narrowed the selection to two men: John Jarvis and Satya Patel. After lengthyinterviews, the following information was accumulated.John Jarvis had a tenure of three years with the company. He was very seldom absent from workand had obtained a college degree in hospitality administration by taking evening courses. Hissuperiors rated his management potential as promising. The one complaint voiced against him wasthat he appeared impatient and overly ambitious. During his interview with the director ofmanagement development, Jarvis indicated that promotions had not come along fast enough forhim and that unless he received this promotion he would seek employment with another majorhospitality organization. He hinted that he had received offers.Satya Patel was several years older than Jarvis. He had been with the company since graduationfrom a nearby university six years previously. He was rated by his superiors as a steady,dependable employee, apparently very intelligent, but he had been given little opportunity todisplay his talent. Three years ago, he had turned down a more responsible position at one of theorganization's branches in another city. He said he didn't want to relocate, and the job requiredsome traveling. Since that time he had not been given another opportunity to move upward in theorganization.In considering the recommendation he would make, the director of managerial developmentrecalled a comment Patel had made during his interview: "I'm confident that you will recognizethe importance of seniority when you make your final recommendation." STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:For a high-level management position at the Long Stay Suites, the director of managementdevelopment must choose between Satya Patel and John Jarvis. The primary issue lies inselecting the candidate with the greatest potential, experience, and qualifications for theposition.OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:1. Identify the candidate with the highest potential for effective management in thecompany.2. Evaluate the qualifications, experience, and performance of John Jarvis and Satya Patelto determine their suitability for the high-level management position.3. Assess the impact of factors such as ambition, seniority, and willingness to relocate onthe candidates' ability to fulfill the responsibilities of the management position.ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION (ACA):1. Promote John Jarvis:John Jarvis's promising management potential, consistemattendance, and pursuit of a hospitality administration degree could lead the director ofmanagement development to recommend that he be promoted. Despite Jarvis'simpatience and ambition, his potential may outweigh these concerns.2. Promote Satya Patel: The director could recommend promoting Satya Patel due to hisseniority within the company and his dependable track record. Despite turning down aprevious opportunity for advancement, Patel's intelligence and loyalty could make him asuitable candidate for the high-level management position.3. Further assessment and evaluation:The director could request additional assessments,such as performance evaluations or competency tests, to gather more information aboutJohn Jarvis and Satya Patel. This would provide a more comprehensive understanding oftheir abilities, potential, and compatibility with the management position.REQUIRED:ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGESACAPromote John Jarvis:Promote Satya PatelFurther assessment andevaluationAdvantagesBEST SOLUTION (choose the best solution)CONLUSIONDisadvantages

Question

Please answer the subparts only:• advantages and disadvantages • best solution• conclusion Case Study for STAFFINGChoosing a ManagerThe director of management development for the Long Stay Suites was required to recommendsomeone for a high-level management position in the company. Careful screening of all presentemployees narrowed the selection to two men: John Jarvis and Satya Patel. After lengthyinterviews, the following information was accumulated.John Jarvis had a tenure of three years with the company. He was very seldom absent from workand had obtained a college degree in hospitality administration by taking evening courses. Hissuperiors rated his management potential as promising. The one complaint voiced against him wasthat he appeared impatient and overly ambitious. During his interview with the director ofmanagement development, Jarvis indicated that promotions had not come along fast enough forhim and that unless he received this promotion he would seek employment with another majorhospitality organization. He hinted that he had received offers.Satya Patel was several years older than Jarvis. He had been with the company since graduationfrom a nearby university six years previously. He was rated by his superiors as a steady,dependable employee, apparently very intelligent, but he had been given little opportunity todisplay his talent. Three years ago, he had turned down a more responsible position at one of theorganization's branches in another city. He said he didn't want to relocate, and the job requiredsome traveling. Since that time he had not been given another opportunity to move upward in theorganization.In considering the recommendation he would make, the director of managerial developmentrecalled a comment Patel had made during his interview: &#34;I'm confident that you will recognizethe importance of seniority when you make your final recommendation.&#34; STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:For a high-level management position at the Long Stay Suites, the director of managementdevelopment must choose between Satya Patel and John Jarvis. The primary issue lies inselecting the candidate with the greatest potential, experience, and qualifications for theposition.OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:1. Identify the candidate with the highest potential for effective management in thecompany.2. Evaluate the qualifications, experience, and performance of John Jarvis and Satya Patelto determine their suitability for the high-level management position.3. Assess the impact of factors such as ambition, seniority, and willingness to relocate onthe candidates' ability to fulfill the responsibilities of the management position.ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION (ACA):1. Promote John Jarvis:John Jarvis's promising management potential, consistemattendance, and pursuit of a hospitality administration degree could lead the director ofmanagement development to recommend that he be promoted. Despite Jarvis'simpatience and ambition, his potential may outweigh these concerns.2. Promote Satya Patel: The director could recommend promoting Satya Patel due to hisseniority within the company and his dependable track record. Despite turning down aprevious opportunity for advancement, Patel's intelligence and loyalty could make him asuitable candidate for the high-level management position.3. Further assessment and evaluation:The director could request additional assessments,such as performance evaluations or competency tests, to gather more information aboutJohn Jarvis and Satya Patel. This would provide a more comprehensive understanding oftheir abilities, potential, and compatibility with the management position.REQUIRED:ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGESACAPromote John Jarvis:Promote Satya PatelFurther assessment andevaluationAdvantagesBEST SOLUTION (choose the best solution)CONLUSIONDisadvantages

Accepted Answer

The director of management development is tasked with choosing a candidate for a senior management…

REQUIRED: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES ACA Promote John Jarvis: Promote Satya Patel Further assessment and evaluation Advantages BEST SOLUTION (choose the best solution) CONLUSION Disadvantages