Respond to the following: In today's economy, there are powerful companies that seem to control massive segments of different markets. Using the NEXIS-Uni Legal Database in the Strayer Library or the FTC website below, research a company that has been sued for anti-competitive behavior in the last five years. Explain the facts of the lawsuit, why the actions were anti-competitive, and whether it is a horizontal restraint of trade or a vertical restraint of trade. (Explain these terms in your answer.) (Note: Do NOT use Amazon, Google, Facebook, Qualcomm, Samsung, or Apple. Try to find a lawsuit from a company in your home state, if available).

Respond to the following: In today's economy, there are powerful companies that seem to control massive segments of different markets. Using the NEXIS-Uni Legal Database in the Strayer Library or the FTC website below, research a company that has been sued for anti-competitive behavior in the last five years. Explain the facts of the lawsuit, why the actions were anti-competitive, and whether it is a horizontal restraint of trade or a vertical restraint of trade. (Explain these terms in your answer.) (Note: Do NOT use Amazon, Google, Facebook, Qualcomm, Samsung, or Apple. Try to find a lawsuit from a company in your home state, if available).

Microeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617406

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter12: Government And Product Markets: Antitrust And Regulation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Discuss the Berne Convention agreement on intellectual property.
In 1980, in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, President Jimmy Carter imposed a grain embargo prohibiting the sale of American grain to the Soviet Union. The Soviets adapted and got grain from elsewhere. The Chinese, in response to Trump’s tariffs, stopped buying U.S. soybeans, getting them instead from Brazil. There is little evidence that such embargoes put any real economic pressure on their targets. When a government embargoes the products of another country what other, potentially unintended and/or negative consequences could you imagine from that act? (100 words maximum)
You have become a (well-paid) consultant to the Government of Indonesia on trade policy. Indonesia is an importer of Cars and an exporter of Steel. Suppose that you are choosing between advocating an import tariff on steel and an export subsidy on cars. If you assume perfect competition on each of these markets, which of the trade policies will you suggest? Please explain
The courts have ruled that it is reasonable restraint of trade (and therefore permissible) for the owner of a business to sell his business & a contract with the new owner saying that he will not compete with her within a vicinity of, say, 100 miles , for a period of, five years. if this type of contract is a reasonable restraint of trade, you can give an example of what you would consider an unreasonable restraint of trade? explain how you decide what is a reasonable restraint of trade and what is not.
The Clayton Act prohibits “all contracts, combinations and conspiracies in restraint of trade.” true or false
Clearly explain using a GRAPH, how a tariff barrier can be effectively used to protect domestic industry, for which the supply curve is perfectly elastic.
Explain and illustrate the Heckscher-Ohlin Model of trade.
What are the two main conclusions of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory of trade?
QUESTION 36 In 2018, a few countries want to join together to restrict the oil supply to the world market. Together, these countries' exports of oil account for 80% of the total global trade. What would they be trying to accomplish? They are attempting to form a cartel, increase their joint output, and control a larger percentage of the total global trade. They are attempting to price discriminate between consumers of their exported oil, thereby increasing their share of the global trade and increasing their joint profits. They are attempting to form a cartel, jointly restrict output, and increase the world price of oil. They are attempting to act as a bloc to restrict entry of new producers to the world market, and thereby protect their joint profits.
Economic thinking suggests that a nation in which middlemen are considered to be unproductive seekers of profit, and where their activities are heavily restricted by law, will a. gain by channeling people's efforts away from unproductive middleman activity toward physical output. b. lose the potential gains from trade that would result from lower transaction costs emanating from middleman activities. c. find that it is richer because the added transaction costs normally imposed by middlemen will be reduced. d. gain because the value of total output will rise.
What does the phrase "piercing the corporate veil" mean? When might the corporate veil be pierced? How does this philosophy compare with that of many of the United States' trading partners?
Briefly describe the term embargo