RNA editing is a common process in the mitochondria of trypanosomes and plants as well as in chloroplasts, and in rare cases it occurs in higher eukaryotes. What is RNA editing, and what benefit does it demonstrate in the documented example of ApoB in humans?

RNA editing is a common process in the mitochondria of trypanosomes and plants as well as in chloroplasts, and in rare cases it occurs in higher eukaryotes. What is RNA editing, and what benefit does it demonstrate in the documented example of ApoB in humans?

Name: RNA editing is a common process in the mitochondria of trypanosomes an
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:42:41.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: RNA editing is a common process in the mitochondria of trypanosomes and plants as well as in chloroplasts, and in rare cases it occurs in higher eukaryotes. What is RNA editing, and what benefit does it demonstrate in the documented example of ApoB i

Human Heredity: Principles and Issues (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781305251052

Author:Michael Cummings

Publisher:Michael Cummings

Chapter15: Genomes And Genomics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Proteins such as Dicer and RDE-R are involved in RNAi inactivation of target gene expression and are present in most eukaryotes. However, most eukaryotic cells do not naturally produce double stranded RNA. What is the most likely reason why these genes are evolutionarily retained in most eukaryotes? What are possible consequences of intron retention?
The entire genome of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been sequenced. This sequencing has led to the identification of all the open reading frames (ORFs, gene-size sequences with appropriate translational initiation and termination signals) in the genome. Some of these ORFs are previously known genes with established functions; however, the remainder are unassigned reading frames (URFs). To deduce the possible functions of the URFs, they are being systematically, one at a time, converted into null alleles by in vitro knockout techniques. The results are as follows:15 percent are lethal when knocked out.25 percent show some mutant phenotype (altered morphology, altered nutrition, and so forth).60 percent show no detectable mutant phenotype at all and resemble wild type.Explain the possible molecular-genetic basis of these three mutant categories, inventing examples where possible.
. Let’s say that you have incredible skill and can isolate the white and red patches of tissue from the Drosophila eyes shown in Figure 12-24 in order to isolate mRNA from each tissue preparation. Using your knowledge of DNA techniques from Chapter 10, design an experiment that would allow you to determine whether RNA is transcribed from the white gene in the red tissue or the whitetissue or both. If you need it, you have access to radioactive white-gene DNA
How is the T7 bacteriophage regulated expression exploited in molecular biology?
In eukaryotes there is not a consistent relationship between the length of the coding sequence of a gene and the length of the mature mRNA it encodes, even though one nucleotide in DNA = one nucleotide in pre-mRNA or primary transcript. Explain why this is so.
Why are cDNA libraries desirable for the expression of eukaryotic genes in prokaryotes?
Discuss the ways in which RNA pol II contributes to the transcription and regulation of eukaryotic genes.
What is the significance of the fact that human mRNA can be accurately translated in E. coli ?
Gene X codes for a protein in eukaryotes. A mutated eukaryotic cell contains an altered base-pair in an intron of gene X. Which would be the most likely effect of this mutation on the biomolecules in the cell? The amount of pre-mRNA transcribed from gene X would be less than normal. The amount of functional protein corresponding to gene X would be less than normal. The ability of snRNAs to form a spliceosome would be diminished. The breakdown of mature mRNA corresponding to gene X would be faster
Transposable elements, “jumping genes”, were first described by Barbara McClintock in her Nobel prize winning studies with corn. The genome of every multicellular eukaryote that has been sequenced is composed of a large percentage of transposable elements (often 30% to 50%), but they are nearly absent from the genomes of eubacteria and archaea. What are these things and what do they do? Describe and draw the structural organization and mechanism for movement of transposons and retro- transposable elements. What effect do these elements have on the stability of genomes? can you help me answer the bolded question?
The locations of the TATA box in two species of yeast, Saccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, differ dramatically. The TATA box of S. pombe is about 30 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site, similar to the location in most other eukaryotic cells. However, the TATA box of S. cerevisiae is 40 to 120 nucleotides upstream of the start site. To better understand what sets the start site in these organisms, researchers at Stanford University conducted a series of experiments to determine which components of the transcription apparatus of these two species could be interchanged (Y. Li et al. 1994. Science 263:805–807). In these experiments, different general transcription factors and RNA polymerases were switched in S. pombe and S. cerevisiae, and the effects of each switch on the level of RNA synthesis and on the starting point of transcription were observed. The results from one set of experiments are shown in the table below. Components cTFIIB, cTFIIE, cTFIIF,…
The locations of the TATA box in two species of yeast, Saccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, differ dramatically. The TATA box of S. pombe is about 30 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site, similar to the location in most other eukaryotic cells. However, the TATA box of S. cerevisiae is 40 to 120 nucleotides upstream of the start site. To better understand what sets the start site in these organisms, researchers at Stanford University conducted a series of experiments to determine which components of the transcription apparatus of these two species could be interchanged (Y. Li et al. 1994. Science 263:805–807). In these experiments, different general transcription factors and RNA polymerases were switched in S. pombe and S. cerevisiae, and the effects of each switch on the level of RNA synthesis and on the starting point of transcription were observed. The results from one set of experiments are shown in the table below. Components cTFIIB, cTFIIE, cTFIIF,…