Roxanne is considering chipping in to pay for some tree trimming in her neighborhood. If the trees are trimmed, everyone's view improves by the same amount. Roxanne's utility function is given by u(x,t)=3x+1200t, where x is the amount of money she has to spend and t is a variable that equals 1 if the trees are trimmed and 0 if they are not. 1st attempt See Hint Suppose Roxanne starts with $8000. Her utility of that amount of money without the trees being trimmed is 24000 (that is, u(8000,0)=24000). Calculate her reservation price for contributing to the tree-trimming project. $

Roxanne is considering chipping in to pay for some tree trimming in her neighborhood. If the trees are trimmed, everyone's view improves by the same amount. Roxanne's utility function is given by u(x,t)=3x+1200t, where x is the amount of money she has to spend and t is a variable that equals 1 if the trees are trimmed and 0 if they are not. 1st attempt See Hint Suppose Roxanne starts with $8000. Her utility of that amount of money without the trees being trimmed is 24000 (that is, u(8000,0)=24000). Calculate her reservation price for contributing to the tree-trimming project. $

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter3: Preferences And Utility

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sanjay won a poker game against his friends. Now he has to choose between $600 (the winnings) and the chance to play a new game. In this new game, Sanjay has a 50% chance of winning nothing and a 50% chance of winning $1000. The following graph presents the utility function of Sanjay with respect to money: 1. By how much money would his winnings need to increase or decrease so that Sanjay isindifferent between the $600 and the new game? At a different table, Juan wins $800 in a blackjack game. Similarly, he has to choose between $800 or the chance to win a new game. In this game, Juan has a 45% chance of winning nothing and a 55% chance of winning $1000. The following graph presents the utility function of Juan with respect to money: 2. By how much money would his winnings need to increase or decrease so that Juan is indifferent between the $800 and the new game? Please enter a positive number for an increase or a negative number for a decrease.
Question: Finn is in charge of decorations for an upcoming festival, and he is planning to decorate withclovers (C) and flags (F). Suppose his preferences over decorations can be represented by theutility function: U(C,F) = C3/4 F1/4 **For this problem, assume C and F are infinitely divisible so you don’t need to worry about restricting to whole-number answers. a.) Write Finn’s budget constraint as a function of the prices PC , PF and his budget I. b.) Write Finn’s constrained optimization problem in Lagrangian form and derive the threefirst order conditions.
Student question Time Left :00:09:43Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = 2X + Y UB(X,Y) = Min(X,Y) The initial endowments are: A: X = 5; Y = 3 B: X = 2; Y = 2 a. Illustrate the initial endowments in an Edgeworth Box. Be sure to label the Edgeworth Box carefully and accurately, and make sure the dimensions of the box are correct. Also, draw each consumer’s indifference curve that runs through the initial endowments. Is this initial endowment Pareto Efficient? b. Now suppose Consumer A gets all of both goods. Is this allocation Pareto Efficient? (You do not need to draw a new graph or illustrate this on the existing graph. Simply answer “yes” or “no.”) c. Now suppose Consumer B gets all of both goods. Is this allocation Pareto Efficient? (You do not need to draw a new graph or illustrate this on the existing graph. Simply answer “yes” or “no.”)
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1
Assume that someone has inherited 2,000 bottles of wine from a rich uncle. He or she intends to drink these bottles over the next 40 years. Suppose that this person’s utility function for wine is given by u(c(t)) = (c(t))0.5, where c(t) is each instant t consumption of bottles. Assume also this person discounts future consumption at the rate δ = 0.05. Hence this person’s goal is to maximize 0ʃ40 e–0.05tu(c(t))dt = 0ʃ40 e–0.05t(c(t))0.5dt. Let x(t) represent the number of bottle of wine remaining at time t, constrained by x(0) = 2,000, x(40) = 0 and dx(t)/dt = – c(t): the stock of remaining bottles at each instant t is decreased by the consumption of bottles at instant t. The current value Hamiltonian expression yields: H = e–0.05t(c(t))0.5 + λ(– c(t)) + x(t)(dλ/dt). This person’s wine consumption decreases at a continuous rate of ??? percent per year. The number of bottles being consumed in the 30th year is approximately ???
Consider a couple's decision about how many children to have. Assume that over a lifetime a couple has 100,000 hours of time to either work or raise children. The wage is $10 per hour. Raising a child takes 10,000 hours of time. a. Make a graph with the budget constraint showing the trade-off between lifetime consumption and number of children. (Ignore the fact that children come only in whole numbers!) Show indifference curves and an optimum choice. b. Suppose the wage increases to $15 per hour. Show how the budget constraint shifts. Using income and substitution effects, discuss the impact of the change on number of children and lifetime consumption. c. We observe that, as societies get richer and wages rise, people typically have fewer children. Is this fact consistent with this model? Explain.
A possible explanation for the indecency might be the fact that the consumers are not all alive at the same time and therefore some mutually advantageous trades cannot occur. Consider an economy where consumer t receives an endowment of 1 unit of the single consumption good at time t and obtains utility only from consumption at times t and t + 1. All consumers meet at time 0 to trade. What is the equilibrium? Is exigency restored?
Suppose Bilbo Baggins is deciding on whether to buy a sword or a bag of golden cups. If he has a utility function of U(C,S)= √(4C+S) and treasures amounting to 200, while the prices of the sword and bag of golden cup are 4 coppers and 5 coppers, respectively, how many swords and bags of cups can he buy?
Suppose a family (with 1 child) earns $50,000 per year and there is no publicly provided education. Assume the price of other goods is $2,000 and the price for education/ year is $5,000. Draw the family's budget constraint. Show how free public education worth $20,000 per student changes the budget constraint. Draw a set of indifference curves to show that the family increases education consumption after b. Show how a school voucher redeemable for $20,000 worth of education changes the family's budget constraint. What happens to the amount of education the family purchases for the child?
Frank spends $75 on 10 magazines and 25 newspapers. The magazines cost $5 each and the newspapers cost $2.50 each. Suppose that his MU from the final magazine is 10 utils while his MU from the final newspaper is also 10 utils. According to the utility-maximizing rule, Frank should: a. Reallocate spending from magazines to newspapers. b. Reallocate spending from newspapers to magazines. c. Be satisfied because he is already maximizing his total utility. d. None of the above
4. Show how to construct the reference dependent utility function for two friends Kate and Mary whose gains and losses are listed as follows : Kate's net worth is $ 4.5 million ( decreased from $ 5.5 to $ 4.5 million ) Mary's net worth $ 3.2 million ( increased from $ 3 to $ 3.2 million ) ( First determine the reference point ( use a parameter ) and then derive reference utility function for each ) .
In an environment in which all education is privately provided, suppose that a family with one child has $20,000 per year to spend on private goods and education. Draw this family’s budget constraint. Suppose now that an option of free public education with spending of $4,000 per pupil is introduced to this family. Draw three different indifference curves corresponding to the following three situations: (a) a free public education would increase the amount of money that is spent on the child’s education; (b) a free public education would decrease the amount of money that is spent on the child’s education; (c) a free public education would not affect the amount of money spent on the child’s education.