Following are the productions of a grammar with attributes:S --> T:S.val = T.valS --> X:S.val = x.val- T --> S+S:T.val = s1.val + S2.valwhere x and + are letters from the input alphabet, s and T are variables, .val is the attribute denoting the actual value of the representedexpression (+ in the attribute meaning addition).What is the value of the expression x+x+x+x+x, if we know the values for the x-es are 1,2,3,6,15 in order?Select one:O 27.O 123615.O 1.O 15.

The correct answer to the given question is option "a""27"

S --> T: S.val = T.val S --> x: S.val = x.val T --> S+S: T.val = s1.val + S2.val here x and + are letters from the input alphabet, s and T are variables, .val is the attribute denoting the actual valu pression (+ in the attribute meaning addition). hat is the value of the expression x+x+x+x+x, if we know the values for the x-es are 1,2,3,6,15 in order?

S --> T: S.val = T.val S --> x: S.val = x.val T --> S+S: T.val = s1.val + S2.val here x and + are letters from the input alphabet, s and T are variables, .val is the attribute denoting the actual valu pression (+ in the attribute meaning addition). hat is the value of the expression x+x+x+x+x, if we know the values for the x-es are 1,2,3,6,15 in order?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

for the grammar below, determine if the grammar is ambiguous; and if the grammar is ambiguous, find a string that demonstrates the ambiguity and also draw two different parse trees for the string: S → aSa | bSb | cSc | a | b | c | ε
Make the grammar parser for the grammar below. The lexical analyzer is considered known. The components written in bold are considered woven: cell fiber| woven cells: (cell)+ cell: ADN ARN Please I need the source code
Construct total language tree for the grammar below S→ XYb|bX X→ bX|Xa|a Y→ aY|Yb|b note: subject: compailer concept deptt: cs/It
Problem 3 Design context-free grammars for the following languages: a) The set {a^i b^j c^k| i does not equal j or j does not equal k}, that is, the set of strings of a’s followed by b’s followed by c’s, such that there are either a different number of a’s and b’s different number of b’s and c’s, or both. b) The set of strings over 0 and 1 with “even” length.
for the grammar below, determine if the grammar is ambiguous; and if the grammar is ambiguous, find a string that demonstrates the ambiguity and also draw two different parse trees for the string: S → aSb | C C → ε | c | Cc
Write a BNF grammar for simple phone numbers e.g. (9)123-4567 (21)987-1234 The number must start with a left parenthesis, followed by 1or 2 digits, followed by a right parenthesis, followed by 3 digits, followed by a hyphen, followed by 4 digits. All digits, including 0, can be used anywhere a digit is required. There must be at least 3 rules in your grammar. The goal non-terminal should be called <phone>.
NOTE: This is a multi-part question. Once an answer is submitted, you will be unable to return to this part. Identify the productions of the phrase-structure grammar for each of these languages, where S is the starting symbol. The set of all strings containing an equal number of 0s and 1s Multiple Choice A) S → AS, S → ABS, S → A, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, and B → 1 B) S → ABS, S → A, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, and B → 1 C) S → AS, S → ABS, S → λ, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, and B → 1 D) S → ABS, S → λ, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, and B → 1
for the grammars below, determine if they're ambiguous; and if a grammar is ambiguous, find a string that demonstrates the ambiguity and also draw two different parse trees for the string: a) S → aSa | bSb | cSc | a | b | c | ε b) S → ε | ab | ba | aSb | bSa c) S → aSb | C C → ε | c | Cc
Topic: Compiler Construction Syntax Analysis Show that the grammarA → −AA → A − idA → idis ambiguous by finding a string that has two different syntax trees.Now make two different unambiguous grammars for the same language:a) One where prefix minus binds stronger than infix minus.b) One where infix minus binds stronger than prefix minus.Show the syntax trees using the new grammars for the string you used to prove theoriginal grammar ambiguous.
G(E):E->E + T | T T->T*F | FF->(E) | digitConstruct a parser for grammar E by YACC-BISON, compute the value,and print the result.Design the attribute grammar: + and * operator can only be used for integers,else errors should be reported. code should be submitted as well. Please add explanation. PLEASE DONT COPY AND PASTE THE OTHER SOLUTION ON CHEGG BECAUSE IT ISNT THE FULL ANSWER
1. Draw a parse tree for the string ddadddd using buttom-up and Top-down methods with the Context-Free Grammar below:Q → dQbb | FF → aF | ε 2. What is the problem with a grammar that generates two different parse trees? Give an example. 3. Differentiate between top-down and bottom-up parsing methods using a typical grammar. 4. Write a regular expression to describe inputs over the alphabet {a, b, c} i) that are in sorted order ii) containing at least one a and at least one b 5. Construct the NFA that will accept the string of (dc|ac)* dc (gg|bb)*dc.
NOTE: This is a multi-part question. Once an answer is submitted, you will be unable to return to this part. Identify the productions of the phrase-structure grammar for each of these languages, where S is the starting symbol. {10n ∣ n ≥ 0} (Check all that apply.) Check All That Apply A) S → 1A, A → 0A, and A → λ B) S → 1A and A → λ C) S → 0A and A → λ D) S → 1A, A → A0, and A → λ