Answered: satisfy the condition 4xi + 6yi ≥ 47.

Business

Economics

satisfy the condition 4xi + 6yi ≥ 47.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter4: Utility Maximization And Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4.11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Below is an edgeworth box of two individuals, Ross and Rosa, in the consumption of two goods, X and Y 1. Consider allocations b-f (meaning points a, b, and f). Which allocations(s)A. are better for Ross than “a” (ignoring Rosa)?B. are better for Rosa than “a” (ignoring Ross)?C. are worse for both Ross and Rosa than “a”?D. are better for both Ross and Rosa than “a”?E. are Pareto superior to “a”?2. Suppose that the initial allocation is point a between Ross and Rosa.A. Discuss how Ross’s condition be made better off without harming Rosa(i.e., Rosa maintains her level of utility).B. Illustrate this in a separate diagram and label point/s as necessary (also,if other point/s will have to be made or incorporated).3. Consider once again that the initial allocation is point a. A. Discuss (very briefly) how point d is reached as a Pareto efficientallocation between Ross and Rosa.B. illustrate this condition in a separate diagram.4. Consider points b, c, d, and e. Now plot the utility…
Explain why an economy in which airlines charge different passengers different prices for the same flight will not have exchange efficiency. b. Going back to our two good (Apples, Oranges), two person (Ed, Mary) economy, suppose that at a given allocation, Ed’s MRSAO is 3 and Mary’s MRSAO is 1. Use proof by contradiction to show that this allocation is not exchange efficient. Identify a trade that will increase the utility of Ed and Mary. Explain. Show this graphically (with indifference curves). Going back to our two good (Apples, Oranges), two person (Ed, Mary) economy, suppose that at a given allocation, Ed’s MRSAO is 3 and Mary’s MRSAO is 1. Use proof by contradiction to show that this allocation is not exchange efficient. Identify a trade that will increase the utility of Ed and Mary. Explain. Show this graphically (with indifference curves).
Smith and Jones are stranded on a desert island. Each has in her possession some slices of ham (H) and cheese (C). Smith prefers to consume ham and cheese in the fixed proportion of 2 slices of cheese to each slice of ham. Her utility function is given by Us = min(10H, 5C). Jones, on the other hand, regards ham and cheese as substitutes – she is always willing to trade 3 slices of ham for 4 slices of cheese, and her utility function is given by UJ = 4H + 3C. Total endowments are 100 slices of ham and 200 slices of cheese. a. Draw the Edgeworth Box diagram for all possible exchanges in this situation. What is the contract curve for this exchange economy? b. Suppose Smith’s initial endowment is 40 slices of ham and 80 slices of cheese (Jones has the remaining ham and cheese as her initial endowment). What mutually beneficial trades are possible in this economy and what utility levels will Smith and Jones enjoy from such trades? c. Now imagine a new endowment in which Smith has 60 slices…
Which is the correct answer ? Suppose there are 10 apples and 10 oranges in the economy. Joe is currently consuming 4 apples and 5 oranges, and Jane is consuming 6 apples and 5 oranges. At this allocation, Joe's marginal utility of apples is 3, and his marginal utility of oranges is 5. Jane's marginal utility of apples is 6, and her marginal utility of oranges is 10. The current price of apples is R4 per unit and the current price of oranges is R5 per unit. To reach a competitive equilibrium, the required price adjustment is: A. A decrease in the orange price relative to the apple price. B. A decrease in the apple price relative to the orange price. C. No change in the relative prices. D. An increase in both prices.
A consumer has GH¢600 to spend on two commodities, A and B. Commodity A costs GH¢20 per unit and Commodity B costs GH¢30 per unit. Suppose that the utility derived by the consumer from x units of Commodity A, and y Commodity B is given by the Cobb-Douglas utility functionU (x, y) = 10x0.6y0.4a. How many units of each commodity should the consumer buy tomaximize utility?b. Is the budget constraint binding?
Consider an economy composed of 16 consumers. Of these, 5 consumers each own one right shoe and 11 consumers each own one left shoe. Shoes are indivisible. Everyone has the same utility function, which is Min(2R, L}, where R and L are, respectively, the quantities of right and left shoes con sumed. A) (10%) Is the status quo (where each individual has his own shoe) Pareto efficient? If so, briefly explain why. If not, provide a Pareto improvement b) (10%) Characterize all Pareto efficient allocations
Consider the utility functions below of two individuals, A and B, and bundles of goods Q and R. UA=X0.5Y0.5; UB=X+2Y; Bundle Q (10, 10); Bundle R (10, 15). Suppose the total X and total Y available in the economy are both equal to 20. a. If initially both individuals are consuming bundle Q, then a pareto-improvement is possible through reallocation of goods, i.e. individual A gives B some of his good X in exchange for some of individual B’s good Y. (True or False? Explain through mathematical examples).b. Pareto-optimality is achieved if we give individual B Bundle R and the remaining goods X and Y available in the economy is given to individual A. (True or false? Explain through a graphical example)
Consider a representative consumer in a two goods economy of x and y. The price of good x is 1 TL and the price of y is 3 TL. This consumer is spending all his income at the basket he is currently consuming, and his marginal rate of substitution (MRS) of x for y is 2. Is he at an optimum? If so, show why. If not, explain how he can achieve an optimum point in order to maximize his utility?
If an allocation is Pareto optimal and if indifference curves between the two goods have no kinks, then (Select all that applies) Group of answer choices a. two consumers who consume both goods must have the same MRS between them, but consumers may consume the goods in different ratios. b. two consumers with the same income who consume both goods must have the same MRS, but if their incomes differ, their MRSs may differ. c. any two consumers who consume both goods must consume them in the same ratio. d. for any two consumers who consume both goods, neither will prefer the other consumer’s bundle to his own. e. all consumers receive the bundle that they prefer to any other bundle the economy could produce for them.
An individual's utility is given by: U (q1, q2) = a(q1)+ b(q2), where a and b are constants. When prices are P1= 4 and P2=1, the individual can only maximize utility by purchasing all good #2. When the prices are P1=3 and P2=1, the individual can only maximize utility by consuming all good #1. Which of the following statements below must be true? A. Goods #1 and #2 are complements B. a < b C. 3 < a/b <4 D. The indifference curves exhibit diminishing MRS
Suppose pizza(P) and hamburger(H) are perfect substitutes for Andy. He is always willing to substitute two pizzas for one hamburge(b) The price of pizza is pP = $2 per pizza and the price of hamburger is pH = $2 per hamburger.What is Andy’s optimal consumption bundle if his income level is $30?(c) To promote the sale of pizza, now the owner of the pizza restaurant decides to give out the first two pizzas to every consumer for free, and af- terwards, if the consumer wants more, the consumer will still pay at the price of pP = $2 per pizza. If the price of hamburger and Andy’s income are same as before,draw Andy’s budget line. What is Andy’s optimal con- sumption bundle in this case?(d) Now,to promote the sale of pizza, instead of giving out the first two pizzas for free, the owner of the pizza restaurant decides to lower the price of pizza to $0.8 per pizza. Given price of hamburger and Andy’s income remain the same as before, what is Andy’s optimal consumption budle now? Compare with…
Suppose the utility function of the two individuals in the economy is given by UA = 2XA0.5YA0.5 ; UB = XB0.5YB0.5 and X and Y are allocated equally between the two individuals. Compute for XA, YA ,XB ,YB Calculate the MRSXY of each individual Is the allocation efficient? How so?