show questBikini Bottom GeneticsNameScientists at Bikini Bottoms have been investigating the genetic makeup of the organisms in this community.Use the information provided and your knowledge of genetics to answer each question.1. For each genotype below, indicate whether it is a heterozygous (He) OR homozygous (Ho).TT19 PP12FFBbDDFf 4ttDd 7ff8Tt9.bb 10BB11Which of the genotypes in #1 would be considered purebred?Which of the genotypes in #1 would be hybrids?2. Determine the phenotype for each genotype using the information provided about SpongeBob.Yellow body color is dominant to blue.YY13Yy14уу15Square shape is dominant to round.16Ss17SS183. For each phenotype, give the genotypes that are possible for Patrick.A tall head (T) is dominant to short (t).TallShort =

Name: show questBikini Bottom GeneticsNameScientists at Bikini Bottoms have
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:42:55.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: show questBikini Bottom GeneticsNameScientists at Bikini Bottoms have been investigating the genetic makeup of the organisms in this community.Use the information provided and your knowledge of genetics to answer each question.1. For each genotype b

The genotype of an organism represents the genetic constituents of the organisms while phenotype is…

Science

Biology

Scientists at Bikini Bottoms have been investigating the genetic makeup of the organisms in this community. Use the information provided and your knowledge of genetics to answer each question. 1. For each genotype below, indicate whether it is a heterozygous (He) OR homozygous (Ho). TT Bb DD 3 Ff 4 tt dd 6. Dd 7 ff 8. Tt 9. bb 10 BB 11 FF 12 Which of the genotypes in #1 would be considered purebred? Which of the genotypes in #1 would be hybrids? 2. Determine the phenotype for each genotype using the information provided about SpongeBob. Yellow body color is dominant to blue.

Scientists at Bikini Bottoms have been investigating the genetic makeup of the organisms in this community. Use the information provided and your knowledge of genetics to answer each question. 1. For each genotype below, indicate whether it is a heterozygous (He) OR homozygous (Ho). TT Bb DD 3 Ff 4 tt dd 6. Dd 7 ff 8. Tt 9. bb 10 BB 11 FF 12 Which of the genotypes in #1 would be considered purebred? Which of the genotypes in #1 would be hybrids? 2. Determine the phenotype for each genotype using the information provided about SpongeBob. Yellow body color is dominant to blue.

Human Heredity: Principles and Issues (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781305251052

Author:Michael Cummings

Publisher:Michael Cummings

Chapter14: Biotechnology And Society

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CS: Can DNA profiling identify the source of a sample with absolute certainty? Because any two human...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please answer fast Which of the following defines DNA barcoding? (more than one answer may be correct). Please explain your answer(s). A) uses the DNA sequence of a specific fragment of DNA to identify species B) uses microsatellite allele frequences to estimate Ne C) uses whole genome sequences to identify markers under selection D) uses SNPs and a PCA to display population-level relationships E) uses SNPs and a PCA to display individual-level relationships
900 bacteria had two recessive alleles out of a total of every 10,000 bacteria. Using the Hardy-Weinberg equation(s), determine the frequency of the recessive and dominant alleles.
Many organisms are studied by geneticists. Do you think each ofthe following species would be more likely to be studied by atransmission geneticist, a molecular geneticist, or a populationgeneticist? Explain your answer. Note: More than one answer maybe possible for a given species.A. DogsB. E. coliC. Fruit fliesD. LeopardsE. Corn
subset of African diversity can be found in the genomes of all populations existing today. a. A subset of African diversity can only be found in populations whose ancestors migrated out of Africa at any point in time. b. African diversity is only found in the genomes of population with direct ancestors from Africa migrating from the continent in the last 160KY. c. True statement d. False statement Please answer asap and type your answer and do not copy from anywhere please
https://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/evolution/barriers/
Write a paragraph describing the evolutionary forces driving changes in the human genome. You can include evolutionary forces such as random genetic drift, mutation, migration, and natural selection. These forces would have long-term and short-term effects on coding and non-coding DNA, the abundance of transposable elements, and the birth and death of genes. You can focus on a subset of the human population, or the entire species.
Choose 6 persons who you consider had contributed most importantly to genetic science. In short phrases, incdicate their contribution to genetics that you appreciate so much.
A form of learning disabilities and speech impairment results from a recessive mutation in the HERC2 gene. The next 4 questions are about this mutation. In a small Amish village in Ohio, about 5 per 1000 births are affected with this disorder. Assume Hardy Weinberg equilibrium. What is the frequency of the dominant WT HERC2 allele in this small village? A form of learning disabilities and speech impairment results from a recessive mutation in the HERC2 gene. The next 4 questions are about this mutation. Part a: In a small Amish village in Ohio, about 5 per 1000 births are affected with this disorder. Assume Hardy Weinberg equilibrium. What is the frequency of the dominant WT HERC2 allele in this small village? a)0.005 b)0.995 c)0.07 d)0.93 Part b: What is the estimated total number of homozygous dominant individuals in this village of 1000 people? a) 70 b) 930 c) 860 d) 140
Can DNA profiling identify the source of a sample with absolute certainty? Because any two human genomes differ at about 3 million sites, no two persons (except identical twins) have the same DNA sequence. Unique identification with DNA profiling is therefore possible if enough sites of variation are examined. However, the systems used today examine only a few sites of variation. Nonetheless, even with todays technology, which uses three to five loci, a match between two DNA patterns can be considered strong evidence that the two samples came from the same source. DNA profiling in criminal cases has been a useful tool in establishing both guilt and innocence. Originally, DNA databases contained only the profiles of convicted felons. Over time, however, law enforcement agencies have expanded the collection and use of DNA profiles, and these new policies are causing controversies, once again illustrating how the availability and use of genetic technology is often ahead of consensus on how and when this technology should be used. One of these new policies is postarrest DNA collection. At this writing, 18 U.S. states as well as the federal government allow the collection of DNA samples after an arrest but before conviction. These profiles become part of the states DNA database, which is often searched for evidence in cold cases. Courts across the country have ruled for and against the use of such samples. In 2012, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that the collection of DNA samples from someone who has been arrested but not convicted is unconstitutional and violates an individuals right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The case began when a DNA sample was taken from Alonzo Jay King, Jr., who was arrested in 2009 for assault. In a database search, the DNA profile matched that taken from a 2003 unsolved rape. Based on the results of the database search, the man was sentenced to life in prison. The rape conviction was reversed, and the case was sent back to a lower court. As a result, some 16,000 DNA profiles collected postarrest but preconviction since 2009 cannot be used pending appeal of this decision. Before the court decision, postarrest DNA profiles were used in 65 arrests that resulted in 34 convictions, with an additional 12 cases pending. Supporters of postarrest DNA profiling claim that taking a DNA sample by a cheek swab is noninvasive and no different from taking someones fingerprints. Opponents claim that because DNA samples can be used to determine much more than a DNA profile, they are a threat to privacy, and that because minorities are more likely to be arrested, the practice is discriminatory. What if you learned that law enforcement officials were saving the DNA sample for use in tests that might be developed in the future?
Can DNA profiling identify the source of a sample with absolute certainty? Because any two human genomes differ at about 3 million sites, no two persons (except identical twins) have the same DNA sequence. Unique identification with DNA profiling is therefore possible if enough sites of variation are examined. However, the systems used today examine only a few sites of variation. Nonetheless, even with todays technology, which uses three to five loci, a match between two DNA patterns can be considered strong evidence that the two samples came from the same source. DNA profiling in criminal cases has been a useful tool in establishing both guilt and innocence. Originally, DNA databases contained only the profiles of convicted felons. Over time, however, law enforcement agencies have expanded the collection and use of DNA profiles, and these new policies are causing controversies, once again illustrating how the availability and use of genetic technology is often ahead of consensus on how and when this technology should be used. One of these new policies is postarrest DNA collection. At this writing, 18 U.S. states as well as the federal government allow the collection of DNA samples after an arrest but before conviction. These profiles become part of the states DNA database, which is often searched for evidence in cold cases. Courts across the country have ruled for and against the use of such samples. In 2012, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that the collection of DNA samples from someone who has been arrested but not convicted is unconstitutional and violates an individuals right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The case began when a DNA sample was taken from Alonzo Jay King, Jr., who was arrested in 2009 for assault. In a database search, the DNA profile matched that taken from a 2003 unsolved rape. Based on the results of the database search, the man was sentenced to life in prison. The rape conviction was reversed, and the case was sent back to a lower court. As a result, some 16,000 DNA profiles collected postarrest but preconviction since 2009 cannot be used pending appeal of this decision. Before the court decision, postarrest DNA profiles were used in 65 arrests that resulted in 34 convictions, with an additional 12 cases pending. Supporters of postarrest DNA profiling claim that taking a DNA sample by a cheek swab is noninvasive and no different from taking someones fingerprints. Opponents claim that because DNA samples can be used to determine much more than a DNA profile, they are a threat to privacy, and that because minorities are more likely to be arrested, the practice is discriminatory. Would you object if you were arrested for a minor offense, such as a traffic violation, and ordered to provide a DNA sample?
Can DNA profiling identify the source of a sample with absolute certainty? Because any two human genomes differ at about 3 million sites, no two persons (except identical twins) have the same DNA sequence. Unique identification with DNA profiling is therefore possible if enough sites of variation are examined. However, the systems used today examine only a few sites of variation. Nonetheless, even with todays technology, which uses three to five loci, a match between two DNA patterns can be considered strong evidence that the two samples came from the same source. DNA profiling in criminal cases has been a useful tool in establishing both guilt and innocence. Originally, DNA databases contained only the profiles of convicted felons. Over time, however, law enforcement agencies have expanded the collection and use of DNA profiles, and these new policies are causing controversies, once again illustrating how the availability and use of genetic technology is often ahead of consensus on how and when this technology should be used. One of these new policies is postarrest DNA collection. At this writing, 18 U.S. states as well as the federal government allow the collection of DNA samples after an arrest but before conviction. These profiles become part of the states DNA database, which is often searched for evidence in cold cases. Courts across the country have ruled for and against the use of such samples. In 2012, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that the collection of DNA samples from someone who has been arrested but not convicted is unconstitutional and violates an individuals right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The case began when a DNA sample was taken from Alonzo Jay King, Jr., who was arrested in 2009 for assault. In a database search, the DNA profile matched that taken from a 2003 unsolved rape. Based on the results of the database search, the man was sentenced to life in prison. The rape conviction was reversed, and the case was sent back to a lower court. As a result, some 16,000 DNA profiles collected postarrest but preconviction since 2009 cannot be used pending appeal of this decision. Before the court decision, postarrest DNA profiles were used in 65 arrests that resulted in 34 convictions, with an additional 12 cases pending. Supporters of postarrest DNA profiling claim that taking a DNA sample by a cheek swab is noninvasive and no different from taking someones fingerprints. Opponents claim that because DNA samples can be used to determine much more than a DNA profile, they are a threat to privacy, and that because minorities are more likely to be arrested, the practice is discriminatory. What are your thoughts on the collection and use of postarrest DNA profiles?
Do not copy in Google or in Bartleby QIESTION • A genomic library was made for a various ethnic groups, what do you think how can these data be of use?