Suppose fiscal policy makers implement a policy to reduce the size of a budget deficit. Based on the IS-LM model, we know with certainty that the following will occur as a result of this fiscal policy action. A) Investment spending will decrease. B) Investment spending will increase. C) There will be no change in investment spending. D) Investment spending may increase, decrease, or not change. E) none of the above

Suppose fiscal policy makers implement a policy to reduce the size of a budget deficit. Based on the IS-LM model, we know with certainty that the following will occur as a result of this fiscal policy action. A) Investment spending will decrease. B) Investment spending will increase. C) There will be no change in investment spending. D) Investment spending may increase, decrease, or not change. E) none of the above

Survey Of Economics

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337111522

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter15: Fiscal Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please check the solution to (a) and (b) of the following problem for accuracy and elaborate: Given MPC (marginal propensity to consume) = 0.75, if the government implements an expansionary fiscal policy as (a) cutting taxes by $10 billion, then by how much would total spending increase over an infinite period? (b) spending $10 billion, then by how much would total spending increase over an infinite period? MPC = 0.75 Tax multiplier = (-MPC / 1) = (-0.75 / 1 – 0.75) = (-0.75 / 0.25) = -3. (a) Cutting taxes by $10 billion. The total spending increase by (-3) (-$10 billion) = $30 billion. Spending multiplier = (1/1 – MPC) = (1 / 1 – 0.75) = 1 / 0.25 = 4 (b) Spending 1ncrease by 10 billion. The total spending increase by (4) ($10 billion) = $40 billion.
Let the marginal propensity to consume for an economy be 0.9 (MPC = 0.9). Policymakers in the federal government view the economy as "overheating" and want to enact fiscal policy to reduce AD. This scenario applies questions 31 - 33. Question 31 If the federal government reduces it purchases, G, by $50 billion, by much will real GDP change assuming no mitigating factors on the fiscal multiplier? Edit View Insert Format Tools Table 12pt v Paragraph v BIU A ...
Data is provided below for a small closed economy. Output/Income = 10,000 Consumption = 600 + 0.75(Y - T) Investment = 400 Taxes = 2,000 Government expenditure = 2,000 Assuming that fiscal policy has a multiplier effect and that investment and taxes remain unchanged, what will happen to output if government expenditure decreased by 500? Select one: It would increase by 500 It would decrease by 667 It would decrease by 500 It would increase by 2,000 It would decrease by 2,000 It would increase by 667
How do the instances when expansionary fiscal policy should be used compare with those for contractionary fiscal policy? Expansionary fiscal policy should be used during recessions to help build the economy and contractionary fiscal policy should be used when there is high inflation. Expansionary fiscal policy should be used to increase government revenue and contractionary fiscal policy should be used to increase consumer spending. Expansionary fiscal policy should be used to combat high inflation and contractionary fiscal policy should be used to increase government revenue. Expansionary fiscal policy should be used to decrease the unemployment rate and contractionary fiscal policy should be used when economic growth is too fast.
Suppose the economy begins at full employment and then consumer confidence rises. As a result, the economy is currently experiencing an AD shortfall of $120 billion (AD is 120 below fe) and the MPC=8. What is the appropriate change in Government spending if fiscal policy is used to move the economy back to full employment? a) $24 billion increase in G b) none of the other answers is the appropriate amount of change in G c) $30 billion decrease in G d) $40 billion increase in G e) $120 billion decrease in G
Consider the IS/LM model. Show the effects of the following policies on Y and r on a graph: a) Contractionary fiscal policy b) Expansionary fiscal policy
The graph shows the income-expenditure model for the country of Mireland, where AE represents aggregate expenditure. The Mirsh government wants to cut spending owing to a huge budget deficit and, as such, decides to reduce infrastructure spending by $6.25 billion. Show the impact of this spending cut given a marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of 0.5 and a total tax take of one-quarter in any changes in GDP. In this example, assume that there is no international trade or inflation, and that interest rates are fixed. Planned aggregate spending (in billions of dollars) 2888898828220 70 65 60 50 45 40 30 25 15 10 45 degree line A new government is elected in Mireland and decides to make even deeper cuts in direct spending, totaling $14 billion. What will be the total change in real GDP? Please provide the answer to the nearest whole billion. Planned AB 05 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Real GDP Gn billions of dollars) total change in real GDP: $ 10 billion Enter numeric value
Given MPC (marginal propensity to consume) = 0.75, if the government implements an expansionary fiscal policy as (1) cutting taxes by $10 billion, then by how much would total spending increase over an infinite period? (2) spending $10 billion, then by how much would total spending increase over an infinite period?
The graph shows the income-expenditure model for the country of Mireland, where AE represents aggregate expenditure. The Mirsh government wants to cut spending owing to a huge budget deficit and, as such, decides to reduce infrastructure spending by $11 billion. Show the impact of this spending cut given a marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of 0.6 and a total tax take of one-quarter in any changes in GDP. In this example, assume that there is no international trade or inflation, and that interest rates are fixed. Planned aggregate spending (in billions of dollars) 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 45 degree line Planned AB A new government is elected in Mireland and decides to make even deeper cuts in direct spending, totaling $14 billion. What will be the total change in real GDP? Please provide answer to the nearest whole billion. total change in real GDP: $ 5 Incorrect billion
Suppose the MPC is 0.60. Assume there are no crowding out or investment accelerator effects. Please answer the following questions with calculation details. (1) If the government increases expenditures by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (2) If the government decreases taxes by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (3) Are the above two results the same? Why or why not? Madhavi
Suppose the marginal propensity to save (MPS) is 0.25. If government expenditure goes up by $50 billion, then you can reasonably expect that, ceteris paribus: Real GDP (Y) in the economy will stay unchanged since this is only affected by consumer spending and not government expenditure. Real GDP (Y) in the economy will increase by $12.5 billion. Real GDP (Y) in the economy will increase by $200 billion. Taxes will go up by $50 billion to balance the budget.
Consider a 4-sector Keynesian model like that discussed in class with the following characteristics: exogenous consumption=2000, exogenous taxation=100, government spending=1000, exports=400, planned investment=400. The marginal propensity to save=20%, the marginal tax rate=20% and the marginal propensity to import=40%. The potential output for this economy is 6000. Note that import demand depends on disposable income. a) At its short run equilibrium, this economy is experiencing __________ (a contractionary/an expansionary) gap of __________ (round to 2 decimal places) b) Following the outbreak of a pandemic in the above economy, exogenous consumption falls to 1000 and the marginal propensity to save increases to 40%. In order for this economy to experience a zero output gap, government spending must ____________ (increase/decrease) by ____________ . Assume all other quantities remain unchanged