Suppose that Boston consumers pay twice as much hours as she wants at a wage of w, chooses to work 10 hours a day. Her Boss decides to limit the number of hours that she can work to 8 hours per day. Show how her budget constraints and choice of hours change. Is she unambiguously worse off as a result of this change? Why?

Suppose that Boston consumers pay twice as much hours as she wants at a wage of w, chooses to work 10 hours a day. Her Boss decides to limit the number of hours that she can work to 8 hours per day. Show how her budget constraints and choice of hours change. Is she unambiguously worse off as a result of this change? Why?

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter26: Factor Markets: With Emphasis On The Labor Market

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Bassie, who can currently work as many hours as she wants at a wage of w, chooses to work ten hours a day. Her boss decide to limit the number of hours that she can work to eight hours per day. Show how her budget constraint and choice of hours changes. Is she unambiguously worse off as a result of this change? why?
Suppose the wage you are being paid per hour doubles form $15 to $30. Would you decide to work more hours or fewer hours ? Is there an income and substitution effect involved in your decision about how many hours you choose to work? If so, what is being substituted for what?
draw a budget line for a person who works 2000 hours a year today at 16$ per hour and expects to work 2000 hours in the future at the same wage. then show the effect on the graph if he increases his hourly wage to 50$an hour
Suppose a worker is offered a wage of $5 per hour, plus a fixed payment of $40. What is the equation for the worker’s opportunity set in a given 24-hour day? What are the maximum total earnings the worker can earn in a day? The minimum? What is the price to the worker of consuming an additional hour of leisure?
Illustrate (using a labor-leisure choice diagram) how a firm may induce a typical employee to lengthen his work week voluntarily by paying him premium wage rates for overtime hours.
Cindy gains utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 168 hours. Her utility function is U ( C, L) = C x L. This functional form implies that Cindy’s marginal rate of substitution is C/L. Cindy receives $630 each week from her great-grandmother—regardless of how much Cindy works. What is Cindy’s reservation wage?
Tim works 51 hours per week, and his wage is $20 per hour. If his wage increases to $40 per hour, and his labor supply curve is downward-sloping, this means:
Darla gets her utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 110 hours. Her utility function is U(C, L) = C x L. This implies that Darla’s marginal rate of substitution is C / L Darla receives $750 each week from her grandparents–regardless of how much she works. What is Darla’s reservation wage?
During last summer you agreed with your neighbors to mow their lawn for $20 per hour of work. This year they will require your services again during the summer vacation, should you ask for a higher wage or not?explain your answer.
Akua gains utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 110 hours. Her utility function is U (C, L) = C × L. Akua receives 660 GHS each week from her great-grandmother—regardless of how much she works. a. What will be Akua’s marginal rate of substitution. b. What will be Akua’s reservation wage? (Explain in detail)
According to the Economics Policy Institute (Mishel and Wolfe, 2019) CEO pay has grown 940% since 1978 while the compensation of the average worker has only risen 12%. While you can easily find sources that provide statistics that conflict with these numbers, you would be hard pressed to find any credible source that refutes the idea that the rate of pay of CEO’s and other upper-level managers has not dramatically increased relative to an organization’s lower-level employees in just about any 10 or more year period over the past 60 years. In the world of Adam Smith, the “invisible hand” of the free market capitalistic model would address inequities/out of balances. Are the forces represented by the “invisible hand” working? Why or why not? Is there an ethical dimension to the discussion of upper-level manager compensation? Why or why not? How does (or does it?) levels of pay of upper management impact the rest of us commoners?
Imagine that you work for 40 hours per week at the wage rate of £10 an hour. Your free hours are defined as the number of hours not spent in work per week, which in this case is 24 hours × 7 days − 40 hours = 128 hours per week Suppose now that your wage rate has increased by 100%. If you want to keep your total weekly income constant, then: Select one or more: a. Your total number of hours will fall by 25%. b. Your total number of hours will fall by 50%. c. You will work 25 hours per week. d. Your free time will increase by 25%.