Suppose that the owner of Boyer Construction is feeling the pinch of increased premiums associated with worker’s compensation and has decided to cut the wages of its two employees (Albert and Sid) from $25 per hour to $22 per hour. Assume that Albert and Sid view income and leisure as “goods,” that both experience a diminishing rate of marginal substitution between income and leisure, and that the workers have the same before- and after-tax budget constraints at each wage. Draw each worker’s opportunity set for each hourly wage. At the wage of $25 per hour, both Albert and Sid are observed to consume 12 hours of leisure (and, equivalently, supply 12 hours of labor). After wages were cut to $22, Albert consumes 10 hours of leisure and Sid consumes 14 hours of leisure. Determine the number of hours of labor each worker supplies at a wage of $22 per hour. How can you explain the seemingly contradictory result that the workers supply a different number of labor hours?

Suppose that the owner of Boyer Construction is feeling the pinch of increased premiums associated with worker’s compensation and has decided to cut the wages of its two employees (Albert and Sid) from $25 per hour to $22 per hour. Assume that Albert and Sid view income and leisure as “goods,” that both experience a diminishing rate of marginal substitution between income and leisure, and that the workers have the same before- and after-tax budget constraints at each wage. Draw each worker’s opportunity set for each hourly wage. At the wage of $25 per hour, both Albert and Sid are observed to consume 12 hours of leisure (and, equivalently, supply 12 hours of labor). After wages were cut to $22, Albert consumes 10 hours of leisure and Sid consumes 14 hours of leisure. Determine the number of hours of labor each worker supplies at a wage of $22 per hour. How can you explain the seemingly contradictory result that the workers supply a different number of labor hours?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter16: Labor Markets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that the owner of Boyer Construction is feeling the pinch of increased premiums associated with workers’ compensation and has decided to cut the wages of its two employees (Albert and Sid) from $23 per hour to $20 per hour. Assume that Albert and Sid view income and leisure as “goods,” that both experience a diminishing rate of marginal substitution between income and leisure, and that the workers have the same before- and after-tax budget constraints at each wage. Albert and Sid's opportunity set is presented below: "The horizontal axis labeled leisure hours ranges from 0 to 30 in increments of 5. The vertical axis is labeled income. A line begins at point A on the vertical axis goes down to the right and ends at the point (25, 0)." What is the value of A when the wage is $23? (Assume a 24-hour work day.) What is the value of A when the wage is $20? (Assume a 24-hour work day.) At the wage of $23 per hour, both Albert and Sid are observed to consume 13 hours of…
Suppose that the owner of Boyer Construction is feeling the pinch of incrs associated with worker’s compensation and has decided to cut the wages of its two employees (Albert and Sid) from $25 per hour to $22 per hour. Assume that Albert and Sid view income and leisure as “goods,” that both experience a diminishing rate of marginal substitution between income and leisure, and that the workers have the same before- and after-tax budget constraints at each wage. Draw each worker’s opportunity set for each hourly wage. At the wage of $25 per hour, both Albert and Sid are observed to consume 12 hours of leisure (and, equivalently, supply 12 hours of labor). After wages were cut to $22, Albert consumes 10 hours of leisure and Sid consumes 14 hours of leisure. Determine the number of hours of labor each worker supplies at a wage of $22 per hour. How can you explain the seemingly contradictory result that the workers supply a different number of labor hours? (LO2, LO3, LO7)
Suppose that the owner of Boyer Construction is feeling the pinch of increased premiums associated with worker’s compensation and has decided to cut the wages of its two employees (Albert and Sid) from $25 per hour to $22 per hour. Assume that Albert and Sid view income and leisure as “goods,” that both experience a diminishing rate of marginal substitution between income and leisure, and that the workers have the same before- and after-tax budget constraints at each wage. Draw each worker’s opportunity set for each hourly wage. At the wage of $25 per hour, both Albert and Sid are observed to consume 12 hours of leisure (and, equivalently, supply 12 hours of labor). After wages were cut to $22, Albert consumes 10 hours of leisure and Sid consumes 14 hours of leisure. Determine the number of hours of labor each worker supplies at a wage of $22 per hour. How can you explain the seemingly contradictory result that the workers supply a different number of labor hours? (LO2, LO3, LO7)
Consider a couple (a husband and a wife) that jointly represents their collective preferences between combinations of household production time (X) and purchased goods and services (Y) according to the formula W = X2Y, where W represents the level of welfare. Suppose the maximum time available in a day is 16 hours and currently the wife devotes 6 hours to market work (H) at a wage of $16 per hour. a. What is the level of welfare associated with the wife’s current situation? b. How much additional purchasing power would the wife contribute if her market work hours increased to 8? c. How much of an increase in purchased goods and services would be necessary to compensate for the additional 2 hours of lost household production? d. Should this couple choose to have the wife increase her market work by 2 hours? e. If this couple is raising a child, suppose that combinations of household production and purchased goods are now ranked according to the formula U = X3Y. Would the additional 2…
Assume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves.
Q1: Suppose Labor and Capital are substitutes and the price of capital falls. All else equal, we should expect the labor select (supply, demand) Curve shift select ( up to the right, down to the left ) and for equilibrium wages to select (rise, fall) Q2: An individual has a utility function over Leisure and Income such that ?=?1/2?1/2 This individual has a budget constraint ?=?⋅(24−?)+? The best possible wage this individual can earn in the labor market is $2 per hour. This individual is $30 in debt (they have negative non-labor income). If this individual is earning a utility level of 4, which of the following are true? Group of answer choices The worker could be supplying 1 unit of Labor The worker could be earning $10 The worker could be supplying 8 units of labor The worker is maximizing their utility given their budget The worker's Marginal Rate of Substitution at the point where the budget constraint intersects the indifference curve is equal to -2
What is the optimal number of work hours for the student whose utility function for other goods (X) and leisure (L) is U (C,L) = CL, and who has $50 of nonlabor income per week and the possibility to work at $5 per hour. Assume that after studying for class & other activities, the student has only 50 hours per week remaining to choose between work and leisure.
Mrs. Griffiths earns $5000 a week and spend her entire income on dresses and handbags. Since these are the only two items that provide her utility. Furthermore, Mrs. Griffiths insists that for every dress she buys, she must also buy a handbag. Dress is $25 and handbags is $14. i. Suppose the price of a dress increases to $200 and income decreases to $4200. What would be the new marginal rate of substitution that corresponds to the optimal consumption choice? Interpret the marginal rate of substitution.
Suppose a person can work up to 80 hours per week at a pre-tax wage of $20 per hour but faces a constant 20% payroll tax. Assume that under these conditions the person maximizes utility by choosing to work 50 hours each week. The government proposes a negative income tax so that everyone receives $300 per week regardless of how much they work. To pay for the negative income tax, the payroll tax would be increased to 50%. Using the labor-leisure model, graphically show whether a person would be better off if the negative income tax is adopted and indicate whether hours worked increases or decreases due to the policy.
Susan obtains utility by consuming carrots C and enjoying leisure L. Suppose that she has a daily non-wage income Y of £100 and is paid a fixed hourly wage rate of £10 for every hour she works in a local coffee shop. Assume that Susan is a utility maximiser and is free to choose x hours of work per day where 0 ≤ x ≤ 10. Assume also that the unit price of C is £1. a) Suppose that L is measured on the horizontal axis and C on the vertical axis. Use these axes to draw the set of all C and L combinations that Susan can choose from. Write down Susan’s budget equation. b) Suppose that Susan’s preferences over carrots and leisure are expressed by the following utility function: U(C,L) = min{C, 10L}. Calculate Susan’s optimal consumption bundle, both algebraically and graphically. Calculate the value of MRS at the optimal choice. c) Suppose instead that Susan’s preferences are such that indifference curves in the L-C space are strictly convex to the origin, and that she chooses to work 5…
Assume that consumption and leisure are perfect complements, that is, the consumer always desires a consumption bundle where the quantities of consumption and leisure are equal, that is, C=L 1) (Denote the total hours of time available by h, the real wage by w, the real dividend income from firms by pi (π), and the lump-sum tax by T. Write down the consumer’s budget constraint. 2) Determine the consumer’s optimal choice of consumption and leisure. 3) Assume that there is an increase in w . Show how the consumer’s optimal consumption bundle changes. Explain with reference to income and substitution effects
Consider a consumer who wants to consume only two commodities and has an income of $250. Assume the price of good 1 is $25 per unit and the price of good 2 is $50 per unit. Now, inflation causes the price of good 1 to increase to $30 per unit, while the price of good 2 increases to $60 per unit. On the other hand, the consumer also gets a raise of $110 (so her new income is $360). What will happen to the consumption bundles (x₁, x₂)?