That is whatever is given. i attached a photo below. But for those who dont see it the regression function Yhat=0.5+0.25*X1-0.01*X2-0.43*X3Suppose that X2=X1*X1the standard error of beta0hat = 0.10the standard error of beta1hat is 0.05the standard error of beta2hat is 0.005the stabdard error of beat3hat is 0.05 Suppose you estimate the following regression function where Y, X1, and X2 are continuous variables measured in integers:Yhat=0 5+0 25°X1-0.01"X2-0.43°X3Suppose that X2=X1X1The standard error of beta0hat is 0.10.The standard error of betathat is 0.05The standard error of beta2hat is 0.005The standard error of beta3hat is 0.05.What is the marginal effect of X1 when it increases from 3 to 4? Round to two decimal places Does the relationship between X1 and Y exhibit diminishing marginal returns? Why or why not?O Yes, because beta1hat is positive and beta2hat is negative, and both are statistically significant.O No, because beta1hat and beta2hat are not statistically significant.O No, because betathat is positive, but is not statistically significantO None of the aboveO No, because beta2hat is negative, but is not statistically significantO No, because beta 1hat is positive and beta2hat is negative, but beta2hat isn't statistically significant.O Yes, because beta2hat is negative and statistically significant.O Yes, because beta that is positive and statistically significant

The following solution is given below :

Suppose you estimate the following regression function where Y, X1, and X2 are continuous variables measured in integers: Yhat=0.5+0 25 X1-0.01"X2-0.43'XE3 Suppose that X2=X1X1 The standard error of beta0hat is 0.10. The standard error of betathat is 0.05 The standard error of beta2hat is 0.005. The standard error of beta3hat is 0.05. What is the marginal effect of X1 when it increases from 3 to 4? Round to two decimal places

Suppose you estimate the following regression function where Y, X1, and X2 are continuous variables measured in integers: Yhat=0.5+0 25 X1-0.01"X2-0.43'XE3 Suppose that X2=X1X1 The standard error of beta0hat is 0.10. The standard error of betathat is 0.05 The standard error of beta2hat is 0.005. The standard error of beta3hat is 0.05. What is the marginal effect of X1 when it increases from 3 to 4? Round to two decimal places

College Algebra

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305115545

Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson

Publisher:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson

Chapter1: Equations And Graphs

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10T: Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?
In Table 11.2 the estimated coefficient on black is 0.084 in column (1),0.688 in column (2), and 0.389 in column (3). In spite of these large differences, all three models yield similar estimates of the marginal effect of race on the probability of mortgage denial. How can this be?
In a typical multiple linear regression model where x1 and x2 are non-random regressors, the expected value of the response variable y given x1 and x2 is denoted by E(y | 2,, X2). Build a multiple linear regression model for E (y | *,, *2) such that the value of E(y | x1, X2) may change as the value of x2 changes but the change in the value of E(y | X1, X2) may differ in the value of x1 . How can such a potential difference be tested and estimated statistically?
9)Suppose that Y is normal and we have three explanatory unknowns which are also normal, and we have an independent random sample of 11 members of the population, where for each member, the value of Y as well as the values of the three explanatory unknowns were observed. The data is entered into a computer using linear regression software and the output summary tells us that R-square is 0.79, the linear model coefficient of the first explanatory unknown is 7 with standard error estimate 2.5, the coefficient for the second explanatory unknown is 11 with standard error 2, and the coefficient for the third explanatory unknown is 15 with standard error 4. The regression intercept is reported as 28. The sum of squares in regression (SSR) is reported as 79000 and the sum of squared errors (SSE) is 21000. From this information, what is the adjusted R-square? .8 .7 NONE OF THE OTHERS .6 .5
An econometrician suspects that the residuals of her model might be autocorrelated. Explain the steps involved in testing this theory using the Durbin–Watson (DW) test
If we collect monthly sales over two years for N=100 stores, we should not apply a simple linear regression model directly to the data, because the observations are not independent with each other. Is this statement True or False? A) True B) False
8)Suppose that Y is normal and we have three explanatory unknowns which are also normal, and we have an independent random sample of 11 members of the population, where for each member, the value of Y as well as the values of the three explanatory unknowns were observed. The data is entered into a computer using linear regression software and the output summary tells us that R-square is 0.86, the linear model coefficient of the first explanatory unknown is 7 with standard error estimate 2.5, the coefficient for the second explanatory unknown is 11 with standard error 2, and the coefficient for the third explanatory unknown is 15 with standard error 4. The regression intercept is reported as 28. The sum of squares in regression (SSR) is reported as 86000 and the sum of squared errors (SSE) is 14000. From this information, what is MSE/MST? .5000 NONE OF THE OTHERS .2000 .3000 .4000
If other factors are held constant, if the Pearson correlation between X and Y is r = 0.50, then the regression equation will produce more accurate predictions than would be obtained if r = 0.70. True or false?
Suppose a study wants to predict the market price of a certain species of turtle (Y) based on the following independent variables indicated in the table. Based from the table, what is the equation of the multiple linear regression? (Round off up to two decimal places. Market Price = 0.07 - 0.40*weight + 1.51*length + 1.41*width + 0.80*age Market Price = - 0.40*weight + 1.51*length + 1.41*width + 0.80*age Market Price = 0.07 + 0.40*weight + 1.51*length + 1.41*width + 0.80*age Market Price = 0.07 - 0.40 + weight + 1.51 + length + 1.41 + width + 0.80 + age
I have some doubts regarding linear regression. if any 2 variables in X1, X2 AND Y have a positive correlation, then in the linear regression Y = b0 + b1X1 +b2X2 +e, will the sign of b1 and b2 both be positive? will the residuals that we get from linear regression will always be uncorrelated given X?
Suppose that index model for Stocks A and B is estimated from excess returns with the following results : Ra 0.04 +0.6Rm+ea , Rb = - 0.04 + 1.3Rm + eb Risk on the market is 30% , R-squared of A is 30%R - squared of B is 40% , security A residual variance is
The coefficients in a distributed lag regression of Y on X and its lags can be interpreted as the dynamic causal effects when the time path of X is determined randomly and independently of other factors that influence Y. Explain How?