I want a proper explanation for this question.Justify the answer with the steps and example. Suppose you estimated the multiple linear regression of y on x1 and x2, and found that the estimated coefficient on x2 is negative. Also suppose you estimated the simple linearregression of y on x1 and found that the estimated coefficient on x1 from this simple linear regression is greater than the estimated coefficient on x1 from the previous multiplelinear regression. What can you conclude about the statistical relationship between x1 and x2?X1 and x2 are positively correlatedX1 and x2 are negatively correlatedThere is zero correlation between x1 and x2

Introduction: There are two models considered here: Model 1: Multiple linear regression model of y…

Suppose you estimated the multiple linear regression of y on x1 and x2, and found that the estimated coefficient on x2 is negative. Also suppose you estimated the simple linear regression of y on x1 and found that the estimated coefficient on x, from this simple linear regression is greater than the estimated coefficient on x1 from the previous multiple linear regression. What can you conclude about the statistical relationship between x1 and x2? X1 and x2 are positively correlated X1 and x2 are negatively correlated There is zero correlation between x1 and x2

Suppose you estimated the multiple linear regression of y on x1 and x2, and found that the estimated coefficient on x2 is negative. Also suppose you estimated the simple linear regression of y on x1 and found that the estimated coefficient on x, from this simple linear regression is greater than the estimated coefficient on x1 from the previous multiple linear regression. What can you conclude about the statistical relationship between x1 and x2? X1 and x2 are positively correlated X1 and x2 are negatively correlated There is zero correlation between x1 and x2

College Algebra

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305115545

Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson

Publisher:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson

Chapter1: Equations And Graphs

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10T: Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?
I have some doubts regarding linear regression. if any 2 variables in X1, X2 AND Y have a positive correlation, then in the linear regression Y = b0 + b1X1 +b2X2 +e, will the sign of b1 and b2 both be positive? will the residuals that we get from linear regression will always be uncorrelated given X?
The coefficients in a distributed lag regression of Y on X and its lags can be interpreted as the dynamic causal effects when the time path of X is determined randomly and independently of other factors that influence Y. Explain How?
Suppose there is 1 dependent variable (dissolved oxygen, Y) and 3 independent variables (water temp X1, depth X2, and hardness of water X3). Below is the result of the multiple linear regression.Which of the following is NOT true in the multiple linear regression outputs? In the F-test ANOVA result, if Ho is rejected, this means that the regression model overall predicts the dependent variable significantly well. If a predictor is having a significant impact on our ability to predict the outcome then the regression coefficient b should be significantly different from 1.0. The F-test ANOVA assesses all of the regression coefficients jointly whereas the t-test for each coefficient examines them individually. It is possible that a model is significant, but not enough to conclude that any individual variable is significant.
Suppose that the sales of a company (Y) is regressed on advertising expenditure (x) and labor cost (z), and the estimated regression equation is Y = 5 + 0.5x + 0.7z + u (where u is the error term). Here, sales, advertising expenditure and labor cost are measured in million Tk. Standard error for the coefficient of x is 0.04, standard error for the coefficient of z is 0.01, and the sample size is 20. Can we conclude that advertising expenditure is a statistically significant variable?
In a simple linear regression, show that the OLS regression line always passes through the mean (average) of both x and y.
Suppose that a regression relationship is given by the following:Y = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + εIf the simple linear regression of Y on X1 is estimated from a sample of n observations, the resulting slope estimate is generally biased for β1. However, in the special case where the sample correlation between X1 and X2 is 0, this will not be so. In fact, in that case the same estimate results whether or not X2 is included in the regression equation.a. Explain verbally why this statement is true.b. Show algebraically that this statement is true.
In running a regression of the retunrs of stock XYZ against the returns on the market, the Std for the returns of stock XYZ is 20% and that of the market returns is 15%. If the estimated beta is found to be 0.75 : What is the maximum possible value of beta given that the standar deivation of the returns of stock XYZ is 20% and those of the market is 15% ?
If the R-squared for a regression model relating the outcome y to an explanatory variable x is 0.9. This implies that y and x are positively correlated. True or false?
8)Suppose that Y is normal and we have three explanatory unknowns which are also normal, and we have an independent random sample of 11 members of the population, where for each member, the value of Y as well as the values of the three explanatory unknowns were observed. The data is entered into a computer using linear regression software and the output summary tells us that R-square is 0.86, the linear model coefficient of the first explanatory unknown is 7 with standard error estimate 2.5, the coefficient for the second explanatory unknown is 11 with standard error 2, and the coefficient for the third explanatory unknown is 15 with standard error 4. The regression intercept is reported as 28. The sum of squares in regression (SSR) is reported as 86000 and the sum of squared errors (SSE) is 14000. From this information, what is MSE/MST? .5000 NONE OF THE OTHERS .2000 .3000 .4000
If the correlation of the X's is equal to 1 or -1, then the regression cannot process. Why?
If x and y in a regression model are totally unrelated, _______. the coefficient of determination would be 0 the MSE would be 0s the SSE would be 0 the correlation coefficient would be -1 the coefficient of determination would be 1