The following is an abstract from the paper "Discrimination in Health Care: A Field Experiment on the Impact of Patients' Socioeconomic Status on Access to Care," by Silvia Angerer, Christian Waibe and Harald Stummer. We employ a large-scale field experiment to investigate the impact of patients' socioeconomic status on access to care. We request an appointment at more than 1,200 physicians in Austria, varying the educational level of the patient. Our results show that overall patients with a university degree receive an appointment significantly more often than patients without a degree. Differentiating between practice assistants and physicians as responders, we find that physicians provide significantly shorter response times and marginally significant shorter waiting times for appointments for patients with than without a university degree. Our results thus provide unambiguous evidence that discrimination by health providers contributes to the gradient in access to care. Furthermore, we argue that our results are consistent with implicit bias for practice assistants and statistical discrimination based on financial incentives for physicians.

The following is an abstract from the paper "Discrimination in Health Care: A Field Experiment on the Impact of Patients' Socioeconomic Status on Access to Care," by Silvia Angerer, Christian Waibe and Harald Stummer. We employ a large-scale field experiment to investigate the impact of patients' socioeconomic status on access to care. We request an appointment at more than 1,200 physicians in Austria, varying the educational level of the patient. Our results show that overall patients with a university degree receive an appointment significantly more often than patients without a degree. Differentiating between practice assistants and physicians as responders, we find that physicians provide significantly shorter response times and marginally significant shorter waiting times for appointments for patients with than without a university degree. Our results thus provide unambiguous evidence that discrimination by health providers contributes to the gradient in access to care. Furthermore, we argue that our results are consistent with implicit bias for practice assistants and statistical discrimination based on financial incentives for physicians.

EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY

7th Edition

ISBN:9781337668279

Author:Henderson

Publisher:Henderson

Chapter6: Population Health

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.There is a consensus among health economists that socioeconomic status has a major impact on health, but health does not have a significant effect on SES.
Number of outpatient visit has.... and number of hospital beds has... over the last four decades in the US.
According to Finkelstein et al. (2003), approximately what portion of national medical spending is directed toward the treatment of conditions attributed to obesity? A. One-eighth B. One-sixth C. One-quarter D. One-third E. One-half
Suggest several reasons why health care spending is higher in the United States than in other countries.
The price elasticity of demand for health care has been estimated to be −0.2. Characterize this demand as price elastic, unit price elastic, or price inelastic. The text argues that the greater the importance of an item in consumer budgets, the greater its elasticity. Health-care costs account for a relatively large share of household budgets. How could the price elasticity of demand for health care be such a small number?
Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.The thrifty phenotype hypothesis states that early-life events after birth have a strong influence on health status even in adulthood.
How does a favorable tax treatment and a third-party payer system attribute to the rise of health care costs? Pleasse provide a detail explanation.
Briefly Explain the differences between Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and Rapid Entire Body Assessment.
While it may seem intuitively obvious that health expenditures will increase as a population age – older people, after all, are less healthy on average than younger people – in fact, several prominent health economists have argued that it is not ageing per se, but rather some of the correlates of an ageing population that cause health expenditures to rise as population ages. For instance, Getzen (1992) argues that, at least in part, rising health expenditures with an ageing population are due to the higher incomes and resources of the older population; health care is a normal good, so higher incomes lead to higher expenditures. In a similar manner, Zweifel et al. (1999) argue that the real problem with an ageing population, at least as far as health care costs are concerned, is that there will be more people who are within a couple of years of dying. Since health care expenditures rise sharply close to the end of life, it is this, rather than population ageing by itself, that leads to…
Those without any health insurance in the U.S. tend to be the following groups, except Group of answer choices those who are in excellent health and those with the poorest health. workers in small firms. minimum-wage workers. those receiving Social Security payments.
In order to change the root causes of health disparity in the US, both popular and political will are needed. Based on what you have learned in this module, imagine how different the US would be if all people living here had social protections like universal health care, secure pensions, guaranteed job training, and placement assistance, 80% unemployment pay, income supports for families and unemployed single adults, paid parental leave, and universal childcare. With this concept in mind, for your initial discussion post, comment on whether or not you would be willing to pay 20% more of your income, to have all these benefits guaranteed to you.
While it may seem intuitively obvious that health expenditures will increase as a population ages – older people after all are less healthy on average than younger people in fact, several prominent health economists have argued that it is not aging per se, but rather some of the correlates of an aging population that cause health expenditures to rise as a population ages. For instance, Getzen (1992) argues that, at least in part, rising health expenditures with an aging population are due to the higher incomes and resources of the older population; health care is a normal good, so higher incomes lead to higher expenditures. In a similar manner, Zweifel et al. (1999) argue that the real problem with an aging population, at least as far as health care costs are concerned, is that there will be more people who are within a couple of years of dying. Since health care expenditures rise sharply close to the end of life, it is this, rather than population aging by itself, that leads to higher…