The OS will allocate a dedicated section of main memory for each process. which includes the following sections Select one: a. text. data, heap, and stack. b. ready queue values and I/O queue values. C. process state. process number, process ID and CPU register values. d. stack, queue, and link list.

The OS will allocate a dedicated section of main memory for each process. which includes the following sections Select one: a. text. data, heap, and stack. b. ready queue values and I/O queue values. C. process state. process number, process ID and CPU register values. d. stack, queue, and link list.

Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms

4th Edition

ISBN:9780534380588

Author:Wayne L. Winston

Publisher:Wayne L. Winston

Chapter20: Queuing Theory

Section20.10: Exponential Queues In Series And Open Queuing Networks

Problem 12P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

When feasible, what are the upsides of prioritizing the I/O queue as the place where processes would be executed? If the I/O connection suddenly goes down, what do you expect to happen? How would this affect the fastest possible CPU burst rate? I'm not quite sure I get what you're getting at here.
How would it be advantageous to prioritize the I/O queue above the process execution queue? If the I/O connection fails, who knows what will occur. No one knows how this could effect the CPU's maximum burst rate. I'm confused as to the nature of your question.
When feasible, what advantages does it have to move process execution to the I/O queue first? Should the I/O connection go down, what do you anticipate would happen? Will this reduce the CPU's maximum burst frequency in any way? Not sure I understand what you mean by that.
a. Can a process make transition from Ready state to Blocked state? Why orwhy not?b. Which scheduler must work very fast in order not to waste significantCPU time? Which can be slowc. What are the advantages of multiprogramming over non-multiprogramming systems?d. Is there any protection between threads of a process?e. How threads are more efficient in multiprocessor system?f. What is the advantage of thread switching over process switching? Why?g. What is the advantage of implementing threads in the kernel?h. When are counting semaphores used?i. What is the difference between multiprogramming and multiprocessing?j. When should a user use time-sharing system than personal computer orsingle-user?
When feasible, what advantages does it provide to move process execution to the I/O queue first? If the I/O connection suddenly drops, what do you expect to happen? How would this affect the fastest possible CPU burst rate? I'm not sure I get what you're trying to say.
What's the benefit of assigning a process to the I/O queue before pushing it to the CPU? What will happen if the I/O is wrong? CPU burst? Meaning?
(a) FCFS with a single Ready Queue. A process gets scheduled once one of the CPUsis available. When both CPUs are available, we select CPU1. (b) FCFS with a Ready Queue per CPU. Processes A, B, and C go to CPU1 and processesD, E, and F go to CPU2. (c) HRRN with a single Ready Queue. A process gets scheduled once one of the CPUsis available. When both CPUs are available, we select CPU1.
There are two basic approaches to the design of OS kernel. One is called microkernel approach, and the other is called ___ approach. In xv6, how many stacks are allocated for each process currently residing in the system? The PCB of a process in xv6 contains a pointer to the PCB of its parent process. The variable name of this pointer is ___. In xv6, there is a user-level C program that is used to create the first user process. The file name of this program is _______. Each system call in xv6 is associated with a system call ID (an integer number). The ID for system call read() is ______.
When it comes to process execution, what is the advantage of first allocating it to the I/O queue and then pushing it to the CPU when it is ready? What, in your opinion, will happen if the I/O is not completed correctly? Is the CPU burst going to be affected? What do you mean?
Suppose we have a system with 50 active processes, P0, P1, ..., P49, some user processes, and some kernel processes. For simplicity, we are not concerned with threads in this question. Ready processes are scheduled to Run by some scheduler. The scheduling algorithm does not matter here. Suppose process P13 makes a disk_read() operating system call. Assume that completion of disk transfer is signaled by an interrupt from the disk controller. Trace as accurately as you can what happens in the CPU (not the disk) until process P13 has received its requested information from the disk. Hints: The question is about interrupt handlingI am looking for a trace of what processes run, why, and what they do.I am not looking for instruction-level explanations.I am not looking for a discussion of disk access, operation, or transfer.
Suppose we have a system with 50 active processes, P0, P1, ..., P49, some user processes, and some kernel processes. For simplicity, we are not concerned with threads in this question. Ready processes are scheduled to Run by some scheduler. The scheduling algorithm does not matter here. Suppose process P13 makes a disk_read() operating system call. Assume that the completion of disk transfer is signalled by an interrupt from the disk controller. Trace as accurately as you can what happens in the CPU (not the disk) until process P13 has received its requested information from the disk. Hints: The question is about interrupt handling I am looking for a trace of what processes run, why, and what they do. I am not looking for instruction-level explanations. I am not looking for a discussion of disk access, operation, or transfer.
How would it be advantageous to prioritize the I/O queue above the process execution queue? What will happen if the I/O is interrupted is anyone's guess. Indications are conflicting as to how this could effect the maximum burst rate of the CPU. I'm confused as to the nature of your question.