Suppose your friend Yvette offers you the following bet: She will flip a coin and pay you $3,000 if it lands heads up and collect $3,000 fromyou if it lands tails up. Currently, your level of wealth is $9,000. The graph shows your utility function from wealth. Use the graph to answerthe following questions.UTILITY (Units of utility)1009080706050403020 +100 O03**6сB9WEALTH (Thousands of dollars)12The shape of your utility function implies that you are abecause the difference in utility between A and C is15?individual, and, therefore, youthe difference between C andaccept the wagerWhich of the following best explain why the pain of losing $3,000 exceeds the pleasure of winning $3,000 for risk-averse people? Check all thatapply.Risk-averse people overestimate the probability of losing money.Risk-averse people are relatively poor and cannot afford to lose any money.The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the less satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar.The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the more satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar.

The term utility from the economics perspective refers to the satisfaction that a person gets as a…

The shape of your utility function implies that you are a because the difference in utility between A and C is individual, and, therefore, you the difference between C and B. Which of the following best explain why the pain of losing $3,000 exceeds the pleasure of winning $3,000 for risk-averse people? Check all that apply. Risk-averse people overestimate the probability of losing money. Risk-averse people are relatively poor and cannot afford to lose any money. accept the wager The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the less satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar. The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the more satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar.

The shape of your utility function implies that you are a because the difference in utility between A and C is individual, and, therefore, you the difference between C and B. Which of the following best explain why the pain of losing $3,000 exceeds the pleasure of winning $3,000 for risk-averse people? Check all that apply. Risk-averse people overestimate the probability of losing money. Risk-averse people are relatively poor and cannot afford to lose any money. accept the wager The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the less satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar. The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the more satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar.

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter10: Consumer Choice Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that you are given $20,000 to split between two people, Jane and Fred. The income and marginal utility for each of them is shown in the following table. Amount to Jane Amount to Fred MU of Jane's Last Dollar Spent MU of Fred's Last Dollar Spent $ 5,000 $ 15,000 80 65 $ 7,000 $ 13,000 70 70 $ 9,000 $ 11,000 60 75 $ 11,000 $ 9,000 50 80 $ 13,000 $ 7,000 40 85 Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. If you want to maximize their combined utility, how much of the $20,000 should go to Jane? How much should go to Fred? Amount to Jane = $ Amount to Fred = $
Sanjay won a poker game against his friends. Now he has to choose between $600 (the winnings) and the chance to play a new game. In this new game, Sanjay has a 50% chance of winning nothing and a 50% chance of winning $1000. The following graph presents the utility function of Sanjay with respect to money: 1. By how much money would his winnings need to increase or decrease so that Sanjay isindifferent between the $600 and the new game? At a different table, Juan wins $800 in a blackjack game. Similarly, he has to choose between $800 or the chance to win a new game. In this game, Juan has a 45% chance of winning nothing and a 55% chance of winning $1000. The following graph presents the utility function of Juan with respect to money: 2. By how much money would his winnings need to increase or decrease so that Juan is indifferent between the $800 and the new game? Please enter a positive number for an increase or a negative number for a decrease.
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1
4. Show how to construct the reference dependent utility function for two friends Kate and Mary whose gains and losses are listed as follows : Kate's net worth is $ 4.5 million ( decreased from $ 5.5 to $ 4.5 million ) Mary's net worth $ 3.2 million ( increased from $ 3 to $ 3.2 million ) ( First determine the reference point ( use a parameter ) and then derive reference utility function for each ) .
4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain.
Ceja has utility function U=A2*B2 , where A equals the number of apples she eats each week, while B is the number of bananas she eats each week. Ceja has $20 to spend on fruit each week. The price of an apple is $1, while the price of a banana is $0.25. Find out the combination of Apples and Bananas that maximize Ceja’s satisfaction. If price of Banana is increased by $.25, what will be the new combination of A and B that would maximize her utility? Show graphically and drive the demand curve for Bananas
Alex, who was convinced that "Football is coming home", was very excited for the World Cup last year. Unfortunately, he realized that his favourite Paul Gascoigne jersey from Euro 1996 was getting old, so he wanted to buy a new one before England's first game the following week. He could either buy a 2014 James Milner shirt from retailer A, which would make him totally happy (utility=1), or a 2006 David Beckham shirt from retailer B, which gives him a utility of 0.8. However, the shirts are not available today. There is a 50% chance that retailer A will have the shirt on the week-end, and 70% chance that retailer B will have theirs on the week-end. Due to time and work constraints, Alex can only visit one of these retailers before the tournament starts, otherwise he will have to keep his old 1996 shirt, which gives him a utility of 0.5. He can also ask his friend Nathan to check both places in the morning. But being a Welsh supporter, Nathan will not do it for free and wants some…
Answer the question on the basis of the following two schedules, which show the amounts of additional satisfaction (marginal utility) that a consumer would get from successive quantities of products J and K. Units of J MUj Units of K MUk 1 56 1 32 2 48 2 28 3 32 3 24 4 24 4 20 5 20 5 12 6 16 6 10 7 12 7 8 What level of total utility is realized from the equilibrium combination of J and K, if the consumer has a money income of $28 and the prices of J and K are $8 and $4, respectively? Multiple Choice a. 172 utils b. 168 utils c. 188 utils d. 72 utils Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Consider the following indirect utility function: v(p, w) = w2 /4p1p2 How can we recover the direct utility function (u(x))?
The table shows the total utility (TU) that James receives from consuming different amounts of two goods X and Y, per month. Quantity TUx MUx MUx/Px TUy MUy MUy/Py 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 50 50 16.67 75 75 25.00 2 88 38 12.67 117 42 14.00 3 121 33 11.00 153 36 12.00 4 150 29 9.67 181 28 9.33 5 175 25 8.33 206 25 8.33 6 196 21 7.00 225 19 6.33 7 214 18 6.00 243 18 6.00 8 229 15 5.00 260 17 5.67 9 241 12 4.00 276 16 5.33 d.How much total utility will James experience by buying the utility-maximizing combination? e.Suppose the price of good Y increases to $6. How many units of X and Y will he buy to maximize his utility now?
Suppose Bilbo Baggins is deciding on whether to buy a sword or a bag of golden cups. If he has a utility function of U(C,S)= √(4C+S) and treasures amounting to 200, while the prices of the sword and bag of golden cup are 4 coppers and 5 coppers, respectively, how many swords and bags of cups can he buy?
i will 10 upvotes urgent Say Anna's utility function is given by UA = MAMM, where MA is Anna's wealth and MM is Marie's wealth. Initially, Anna has 160 units of wealth and Marie has 40. When Anna maximizes her utility, her utility level is equal to: Multiple Choice 10,000. 5,000. 100. 200.