There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their illicit behavior based on perceptions of how their teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their class is okay. Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes. Following are hypothetical data similar to the actual research results. The scores represent judgements of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample. Poor Teacher Average Teacher Good Teacher n = 6 n = 8 n = 10 N = 24 G = 72 ∑X2 = 393 M = 6 M = 2 M = 2 SS = 30 SS = 33 SS = 42 Use an ANOVA with an alpha level of .05 to determine whether there are a significant differences in student judgements depending on how they see their teachers. Calculate ?2 to measure the effect size for this study. Write a sentence demonstrating how a research report would represent the results of the hypothesis test and the measure of the effect size

There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their illicit behavior based on perceptions of how their teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their class is okay. Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes. Following are hypothetical data similar to the actual research results. The scores represent judgements of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample. Poor Teacher Average Teacher Good Teacher n = 6 n = 8 n = 10 N = 24 G = 72 ∑X2 = 393 M = 6 M = 2 M = 2 SS = 30 SS = 33 SS = 42 Use an ANOVA with an alpha level of .05 to determine whether there are a significant differences in student judgements depending on how they see their teachers. Calculate ?2 to measure the effect size for this study. Write a sentence demonstrating how a research report would represent the results of the hypothesis test and the measure of the effect size

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8SGR

See similar textbooks

Poor Teacher	Average Teacher	Good Teacher
n = 6	n = 8	n = 10	N = 24 G = 72 ∑X² = 393
M = 6	M = 2	M = 2
SS = 30	SS = 33	SS = 42

Similar questions

Under what circumstances is it advisable to switch to a between-subjects design instead of using a within-subjects design?
In a study of whether taking a garlic supplement reduces the risk of getting a cold, participants were assigned to either a garlic supplement group or to a group that did not take a garlic supplement.† Based on the study, it was concluded that the proportion of people taking a garlic supplement who get a cold is lower than the proportion of those not taking a garlic supplement who get a cold. Do you think that the study was conducted in a reasonable way? What additional information would you want in order to evaluate this study? (Select all that apply.) A) whether the patients knew which treatment they were receiving B) whether the patients were randomly assigned to the treatments C) whether the patient's last name started with A through M D) whether the patient's cold lasted more than a week E) whether the experiment was conducted on a sufficient number of patients so that the differences observed could not be attributed to chance
If gender is the independent variable of a quasi-experiment, this experiment must have a between-subject design. Group of answer choices True False
The term “spotlight effect” refers to overestimating the extent to which others notice your appearance or behavior, especially when you commit a social faux pas. Effectively, you feel as if you are suddenly standing in a spotlight with everyone looking. In one demonstration of this phenomenon, Gilovich, Medvec, and Savitsky (2000) asked college students to put on a Barry Manilow T-shirt that fellow students had previously judged to be embarrassing. The participants were then led into a room in which other students were already participating in an experiment. After a few minutes, the participant was led back out of the room and was allowed to remove the shirt. Later, each participant was asked to estimate how many people in the room had noticed the shirt. The individuals who were in the room were also asked whether they noticed the shirt. In the study, the participants significantly overestimated the actual number of people who had noticed. In a similar study using a sample of n = 9…
In studies examining the effect of humor on interpersonal attractions, McGee and Shevlin (2009) found that an individual’s sense of humor had a significant effect on how the individual was perceived by others. In one part of the study, female college students were given brief descriptions of a potential romantic partner. The fictitious male was described positively as being single and ambitious and having good job prospects. For one group of participants, the description also said that he had a great sense of humor. For another group, it said that he has no sense of humor. After reading the description, each participant was asked to rate the attractiveness of the man on a seven-point scale from 1 (very unattractive) to 7 (very attractive). A score of 4 indicates a neutral rating. The females who read the “great sense of humor” description gave the potential partner an average attractiveness score of M = 4.53 with a standard deviation of s = 1.04. If the sample consisted of n = 16…
It appears that there is some truth to the old adage “That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.” Seery, Holman, and Silver (2010) found that individuals with some history of adversity report better mental health and higher well-being compared to people with little or no history of adversity. In an attempt to examine this phenomenon, a researcher surveys a group of college students to determine the negative life events that they experienced in the past 5 years and their current feeling of well-being. For n = 18 participants with 2 or fewer negative experiences, the average well-being score is M = 42 with SS = 398, and for n = 16 participants with 5 to 10 negative experiences the average score is M = 48.6 with SS = 370. a.) Is there a significant difference between the two populations represented by these two samples? Include whether you reject or retain the Null Hypothesis. Use a two-tailed test with α = 0.01 b.) Compute Cohen’s d to measure the size of the effect. c.) Write a…
It appears that there is some truth to the old adage “That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.” Seery, Holman, and Silver (2010) found that individuals with some history of adversity report better mental health and higher well-being compared to people with little or no history of adversity. In an attempt to examine this phenomenon, a researcher surveys a group of college students to determine the negative life events that they experienced in the past 5 years and their current feeling of well-being. For n = 16 participants with 2 or fewer negative experiences, the average well-being score is M = 42 with SS = 398, and for n = 16 participants with 5 to 10 negative experiences the average score is M = 48.6 with SS = 370. Is there a significant difference between the two populations represented by these two samples? Use a two-tailed test with α = .01 [use the 4-step procedure]. [Remember to assess whether the assumption of homogeneity of variances is satisfied or not, alpha = .01…
3] We all recognize the difference between naughty and nice, right? What about children less than a year old - do they recognize the difference and show a preference for nice over naughty? In a study reported in the November 2007 issue of Nature, researchers investigated whether infants take into account an individual’s actions towards others in evaluating that individual as appealing or aversive, perhaps laying the foundation for social interaction (Hamlin, Wynn, and Bloom, 2007). In one component of the study, infants were shown a “climber” character (a piece of wood with “google” eyes glued onto it) that could not make it up a hill in two tries. Then they were alternately shown two scenarios for the climber’s next try, one where the climber was pushed to the top of the hill by another character (“helper”) and one where the climber was pushed back down the hill by another character (“hinderer”). The infant was alternately shown these two scenarios several times. Then the child was…
Under what circumstances is it advisable to switch to a between-subjects design instead of using a within-subjects design? On the other hand, when is it advantageous to use a within subjects design instead of a between subjects design? Use examples in which you really would have the option of using either design, not situations in which only one of these designs is possible.
The American Hospital Association publishes information about U.S. hospital and nursing homes in Hospital Statistics. The following contingency table provides a cross classification of U.S. hospitals and nursing homes by type of facility and numbers of beds. Facility Number of beds 24 or fewer 25-74 75 or more General 260 1586 3557 Psychiatric 24 242 471 Chronic 1 3 22 Tuberculosis 0 2 2 Other 25 177 208 At the 1% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude than an association exists between facility and number of beds?
In a study examining the effect of humor on interpersonal attractions, McGee and Shevlin (2009) foundthat a man’s sense of humor had a significant effect onhow he was perceived by women. In the study, femalecollege students were given brief descriptions of a potential romantic partner and then rated the attractivenessof the male on a scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). Thefictitious male was described positively as being single,ambitious, and having good job prospects. In one condition, the description also said that he had a great senseof humor. The results showed that the description wasrated significantly higher when “a sense of humor” wasincluded. To further examine this effect, a researcherselected a sample of n = 16 college males and askedthem to read a brief description of a female and thenrate the attractiveness of the woman in the description.The description had been used in previous research butwas modified by adding a statement describing a goodsense of humor. Based on the…
A report summarizes a survey of people in two independent random samples. One sample consisted of 700 young adults (aged 19 to 35) and the other sample consisted of 200 parents of children aged 19 to 35. The young adults were presented with a variety of situations (such as getting married or buying a house) and were asked if they thought that their parents were likely to provide financial support in that situation. The parents of young adults were presented with the same situations and asked if they would be likely to provide financial support to their child in that situation. 1. When asked about getting married, 41% of the young adults said they thought parents would provide financial support and 43% of the parents said they would provide support. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of young adults who think parents would provide financial support and the proportion of parents who say they would provide support are different.…