Two numerically controlled drill presses are being considered by the production department of Zunni's Manufacturing; one must be selected. Comparison data is shown in the table below. MARR is 10%/year. Drill Press T Drill Press M Click here to access the TVM Factor Table Calculator Part a * Your answer is incorrect. Initial Investment Estimated Life Estimated Salvage Value Annual Operating Cost Annual Maintenance Cost What is the future worth of each drill press? Drill Press T: $ 40000 $20,000 10 years $5,000 $12,000 $2,000 $30,000 10 years $7,000 $6,000 $4,000

Two numerically controlled drill presses are being considered by the production department of Zunni's Manufacturing; one must be selected. Comparison data is shown in the table below. MARR is 10%/year. Drill Press T Drill Press M Click here to access the TVM Factor Table Calculator Part a * Your answer is incorrect. Initial Investment Estimated Life Estimated Salvage Value Annual Operating Cost Annual Maintenance Cost What is the future worth of each drill press? Drill Press T: $ 40000 $20,000 10 years $5,000 $12,000 $2,000 $30,000 10 years $7,000 $6,000 $4,000

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Determine the present worth, future worth, and annual worth of the following engineering project when the MARR is 15% per year. Is the project acceptable? Investment cost $10,000Expected life 5 yearsMarket (salvage) value $1,000Annual receipts $8,000Annual expenses $4,000
4. Incremental ROR and B/C methods require the LCM of the two alternatives being compared. Select one: True False
a company is considering the purchase of a new Lathe, where there are 3 alternative Lathes with brands D, E and F with economic value for each Lathe as follows; Lathe Machine D Lathe Machine E Lathe Machine F Initial Cost (Million Rp) 530 540 480 Maintenance Cost (MillionRp) 90 80 100 Residual Value (Million Rp) 60 130 80 Operating Life 10 10 10 Question: Do a Present Worth Analysis to be able to determine the Alternative chosen from the three Generators with MARR = 13%?
Need AsapIllustrate the cashflow diagram and compute for the payback period for a project with the following characteristics, if the minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) is 10%? First Cost $20,000 Annual Benefits $8,000 Annual Maintenance $2,000 in year, then increasing by $500 per year Salvage Value $2,000 Useful Life10 years
You are faced with a decision on an investment proposal. Specifically, the estimated additional income from the investment is $125,000 per year; the investment cost is $400,000; and the first year estimated expense of $20,000 and will increase a rate of 5% per year. Assume an 8-year analysis period, no salvage value, and MARR = 15% per year. a. Calculate the PW and FW of this proposal? b. What is the ERR ( Ԑ=MARR) of this proposal? c. What is the Simple and Discounted payback? include the cash flow diagram and conclusion
You are faced with a decision on an investment proposal. Specifically, the estimated additional income from the investment is $125,000 per year; the investment cost is $400,000; and the first year estimated expense of $20,000 and will increase a rate of 5% per year. Assume an 8-year analysis period, no salvage value, and MARR = 15% per year. a. Calculate the PW and FW of this proposal? b. What is the ERR ( Ԑ=MARR) of this proposal? c. What is the Simple and Discounted payback? (Upload the picture of your complete solutions including the correct cash flow diagram and your conclusion.)
A company is trying to decide whether to keep a fork-truck in their factory or to purchase a new one. The existing fork-truck can be sold now for $28,000 or kept for another 5 years with an overhaul now costing $8,250. If the MARR is 10% should the company buy a new AVG now or keep the existing vehicle? Existing Fork-truck New Fork-truck Initial price cost, $ -34,250 (5 yrs ago) -38,250 AOC, $ -5,500 -7,800 Salvage value, $ 2,500 5,500 Life, yrs 10 12
A design change being considered by Mayberry, Inc., will cost $6,000 and will result in an annual savings of $1,000 per year for the 6-year life of the project. A cost of $2,000 will be avoided at the end of the project as a result of the change. MARR is 8%/yr. Solve, a. What is the internal rate of return of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on internal rate of return? c. Should Mayberry implement the design change?
Deere Construction just purchased a new track hoe attachment costing $12,500. The CFO, John,expects the implement will be used for five years when it is estimated to have a salvage value of$4,000. Maintenance costs are estimated to be $0 the first year and will increase by $100 eachyear thereafter. If a 12% interest rate is used, what is the equivalent uniform annual cost of theimplement?
Littrell's Nursery needs a new irrigation system. System one will cost $145,000, have annual maintenance costs of $10,000, and need an overhaul at the end of year six costing $30,000. System two will have first year maintenance costs of $5,000 with increases of $500 each year thereafter. System two would not require an overhaul. Both systems will have no salvage value after 12 years. If Littrell's cost of capital is 4%, using annual worth analysis determine the maximum Littrell's should be willing to pay for system two.
Calisto Launch Services is an independent space corporation and has been contracted to develop and launch one oftwo different satellites. Initial equipment will cost $750,000 for the first satellite and $850,000 for the second.Development will take 5 years at an expected cost of $150,000 per year for the first satellite; $120,000 per year forthe second. The same launch vehicle can be used for either satellite and will cost $275,000 at the time of the launch5 years from now. At the conclusion of the launch, the contracting company will pay Calisto $2,500,000 for eithersatellite.Calisto is also considering whether they should consider launching both satellites. Because Calisto would haveto upgrade its facilities to handle two concurrent projects, the initial costs would rise by $150,000 in addition to thefirst costs of each satellite. Calisto would need to hire additional engineers and workers, raising the yearly costs to atotal of $400,000. An additional compartment would be added to…
Information about a machine to be purchased is given below. • The purchase cost is ₺755,000 • Salvage value is ₺125,500 • Annual operating cost is ₺58,000 • Periodic repair-maintenance cost is ₺37,000 for every 3 years • In the 4th year,there is a replacement of parts and repair cost of ₺275,000 • The economic life of the machine is 12 years. The minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) is 15% per year. Calculate the annual value of the machine. !!Net cash flow diagrams must be drawn!!