Water contamination Urban alr pollution Greenhouse gas emisslons Increasing wealth Shirting environmental burdens Local Global > Delayed Threaten ecosystems Immediate Threaten health FIGURE 1.17 Ervironmental Indicators show different pattems as Incomes nse. Water oontamination decreases as people can afford wastewater treatment and drinking water filtration. Local alr pollution, on the other hand, often Increases as more fuel is bumed; eventually, development reaches a polnt at which people can afford dean alr technology. Delayed, distant prob- lems, such as greenhouse gas emissions that lead to global dimate change, tend to rise steadily with Income because people make decisions based on Immediate needs and wants rather than long-term oonsequences. Thus, we tend to shift environmental burdens from local and immediate to distant and delayed if we can afford to do so. Source: World Energy Assessment, LNDP Seventy

Water contamination Urban alr pollution Greenhouse gas emisslons Increasing wealth Shirting environmental burdens Local Global > Delayed Threaten ecosystems Immediate Threaten health FIGURE 1.17 Ervironmental Indicators show different pattems as Incomes nse. Water oontamination decreases as people can afford wastewater treatment and drinking water filtration. Local alr pollution, on the other hand, often Increases as more fuel is bumed; eventually, development reaches a polnt at which people can afford dean alr technology. Delayed, distant prob- lems, such as greenhouse gas emissions that lead to global dimate change, tend to rise steadily with Income because people make decisions based on Immediate needs and wants rather than long-term oonsequences. Thus, we tend to shift environmental burdens from local and immediate to distant and delayed if we can afford to do so. Source: World Energy Assessment, LNDP Seventy

Micro Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613064

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter14: Environmental Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In what ways (it) company investments in research and development create positive externalities?
Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of CO2 into the environment from manufacturing industries in the United States. In the first approach, the U.S. government makes it a policy to use only predetermined technologies. In the second approach, the U.S. government determines which technologies are cleaner and subsidizes their use. Of the two approaches, which is the command-and-control policy?
What is an externality?
In 2006, the Australian Government incorporated research into corporate social responsibilities to determineif there is a need to include social and environmental responsibilities within the Corporation Act throughamendment procedure. It was decided not to incorporate a particular regulation through legislation, insteadrely upon the 'market forces' to encourage companies to do the 'right thing'. This viewpoint was expressedthat if companies did not look after the environment or did not act in a socially responsible manner, peoplewould not want to consume the organisations' products. From the equity market perspective, potentialinvestors would not want to invest in the organisations, and further workers wouldn't want to work for them,and so forth. Because companies were aware of such market forces, they would do the 'right thing' even inthe absence of legislation.Requirement:1) Using theories such as Public Interest Theory, Capture Theory and Economic Interest Group Theoryto critically…
Two towns, each with three residents, are decidingwhether to put on a fireworks display to celebrate theNew Year. Fireworks cost $360. In each town, somepeople enjoy fireworks more than others.a. In the town of Bayport, each of the residentsvalues the public good as follows:Frank $50Joe $100Callie $300Would fireworks pass a cost–benefit analysis?Explain.b. The mayor of Bayport proposes to decide bymajority rule and, if the fireworks referendumpasses, to split the cost equally among allresidents. Who would vote in favor, and whowould vote against? Would the vote yield thesame answer as the cost–benefit analysis?c. In the town of River Heights, each of the residentsvalues the public good as follows:Nancy $20Bess $140Ned $160Would fireworks pass a cost–benefit analysis?Explain.d. The mayor of River Heights also proposes todecide by majority rule and, if the fireworksreferendum passes, to split the cost equallyamong all residents. Who would vote in favor,and who would vote against? Would…
Suppose that a mayor of a large city believes strongly that education provides great benefits to the community andurges the state government to provide the district with more money. An economist would say that this reflects theMayor's belief that:Asince teachers are overpaid, the district needs more money to hire enough teachers for its classrooms.Bthere are positive external benefits associated with education.Cthere are nontrivial external costs associated with education.Dpublic schools provide a higher quality education than private schools.
Please helo me with this question There are 50 residents that live in a small town in California. Each resident uses electricity and there is one power station that produces electricity for the residents from coal. Each residents' demand for electricity is Q = 10 - 2P and the supply function for the power plant is Q = 150P. For each unit of electricity that the power station produces, there is a corresponding release of pollution that leads to asthma and other health problems for the 50 residents. The marginal damage of each unit of electricity produced, per person, is $.05. a. What is the market equilibrium price and quantity per unit of electricity? b. What is the efficient Pigouvian tax per unit of pollution? c. The government of this small California town decides to impose the efficient Pigouvian per unit tax on the power station. What is the new social optimum price and quantity per unit of electricity? d. What is the government tax revenue? e. What is the gain in total…
The problems with e.g."Acid rain" created by emissions of sulfur dioxide has been onemajor problem in Sweden, not least because emissions have occurred in other countries (eg England and Denmark) andthen transported here. Now assume that if one tonne of sulfur is emitted in England, it results in one (1) gram of sulfur deposition in Sweden. The corresponding deposit of one tonne of sulfur emissions in Denmark is assumed to be 3 grams. Suppose further that The socio-economic damage of one gram of sulfur deposit can be estimated at SEK 0.10.The marginal cost of reduce sulfur emissions in England is estimated at Z SEK per tonne, and in Denmark the equivalent is estimatedcost to 2Z SEK per tonne. Z indicates here the emission reduction in tonnes (eg in Denmark it would cost SEK 4 toreduce emissions by two tonnes). In other words, Z = 0 corresponds to the emission level where there is no reductionemissions occur. a) Suppose now that the European Union decides that Denmark and England…
Can you continue to the otherremaining please.Union of South American Nations (USAN)How these RO are affected and responded to the COVID 19 pandemic.
Draw a production possibility frontier. The vertical axis shows theproduction of public sector goods and the horizontal axis showsproduction of private sector goods. The economy is currentlyproducing at point A on the frontier where 50 per cent of allproduction is devoted to public sector goods and 50 per cent toprivate sector goods.(a) Mark the following points on your drawing.(i) Point A.(in) Point B which shows production following the election of agoverment which increases government spending on botheducation and the National Health Service.(ili) Point C where unemployment is present in the economy.(iv) Point D where the government takes over production of allgoods and services in the econory.(b) Draw another diagram putting on it the original productionpossibility Frontier you drew for (a), labelling it AA.(i) Draw a new production possibility frontier on the diagram,labelling it PP, which shows the position after a devastatingwar has hit the economy.(in) Draw another PPF…
Table: Coal Mine Pollution Quantity ofPollution(tons) MarginalSocialBenefit MarginalSocialCost 0 $800 $0 1 $700 $100 2 $600 $200 3 $500 $300 4 $400 $400 5 $300 $500 6 $200 $600 7 $100 $700 8 $0 $800 Reference: Ref 16-2 Table: Coal Mine Pollution (Table: Coal Mine Pollution) Use Table: Coal Mine Pollution. The table shows the marginal social benefit and cost of various amounts of pollution from a coal mine. At the efficient quantity of pollution, the marginal social benefit of pollution is: Select one: a. $400. b. $300. c. $100. d. $200.
Suppose that a firm’s emissions and Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC) data are summarized in thetable below. e MAC 0 200 10 180 20 160 30 140 40 120 50 100 60 80 70 60 80 40 90 20 100 0 a. If the price of a pollution permit is $100, how many permits will the firm need? Explain.b. Suppose that the price of a pollution permit increases to $120, how many permits will thefirm need? Explain.c. With this new price of $120, will the firm’s emissions increase or decrease? By howmuch? Explain.d. Can the firm sell any permits? If so, what is the revenue generated from permit sales?Explain.