We do not consider randomization. The relationship between a Nash equilibrium and an equilibrium in dominant strategies is that: an equilibrium in dominant strategies is a special case of a Nash equilibrium. O a Nash equilibrium is a special case of an equilibrium in dominant strategies. O they are the same. O a Nash equilibrium always exists, but an equilibrium in dominant strategies may not exist.

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter19: Externalities And Public Goods
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 19.12P
icon
Related questions
Question
We do not consider randomization. The relationship between a Nash equilibrium and an
equilibrium in dominant strategies is that:
an equilibrium in dominant strategies is a special case of a Nash equilibrium.
O a Nash equilibrium is a special case of an equilibrium in dominant strategies.
O they are the same.
O a Nash equilibrium always exists, but an equilibrium in dominant strategies may not exist.
Transcribed Image Text:We do not consider randomization. The relationship between a Nash equilibrium and an equilibrium in dominant strategies is that: an equilibrium in dominant strategies is a special case of a Nash equilibrium. O a Nash equilibrium is a special case of an equilibrium in dominant strategies. O they are the same. O a Nash equilibrium always exists, but an equilibrium in dominant strategies may not exist.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Least-Square Techniques
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage