We mentioned that two types of networks, datagram and virtual-circuit, need a routing or switching table to find the output port from which the information belonging to a destination should be sent out, but a circuit-switched network has no need for such a table. Give the reason for this difference.

We mentioned that two types of networks, datagram and virtual-circuit, need a routing or switching table to find the output port from which the information belonging to a destination should be sent out, but a circuit-switched network has no need for such a table. Give the reason for this difference.

Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms

4th Edition

ISBN:9780534380588

Author:Wayne L. Winston

Publisher:Wayne L. Winston

Chapter20: Queuing Theory

Section20.10: Exponential Queues In Series And Open Queuing Networks

Problem 8P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

We mentioned that two types of networks, datagram and virtual-circuit, need arouting or switching table to find the output port from which the informationbelonging to a destination should be sent out, but a circuit-switched networkhas no need for such a table. Give the reason for this difference
Is that so, or not? Consider a TCP connection where the most recent SampleRTT was 1 second. It is recommended that the TimeoutInterval be set to more than one second.
The minimum number of columns in a datagram network is two; the minimumnumber of columns in a virtual-circuit network is four. Can you explain thereason? Is the difference related to the type of addresses carried in the packetsof each network?
What is meant by connection state information in virtual circuit network? If in a switch in VC network, connections are established and from down at a rate of one connection per millisecond (on average), at what rate dose the forwarding table in the switch need to be modified?
A synchronous connection and an isochronous connection example should be provided, followed by a description of the key distinctions between the two kinds of connections.
Circuit-switched networks, unlike datagram and virtual-circuit networks, do not require a routing or switching table to determine the output port from which the information pertaining to a destination can be transferred. Please enlighten us as to the reason for this disparity.
If a two port bridge was used in a heavy load standard Ethernet network such that the traffic is going through it. If each station is theoretically given a capacity of5Mbpsand the number of stations in each LAN segment is equal, then the number of stations in each LAN is:
As another example, consider a circuit-switched network that connects computers in two remote offices of a private company. The offices are connected using a T-1 line leased from a communication service provider. There are two 4 × 8 (4 inputs and 8 outputs) switches in this network. For each switch, four output ports are folded into the input ports to allow communication between computers in the same office. Four other output ports allow communication between the two offices. Figure shows the situation
I would appreciate it if you could brief a coworker on the ARP protocol. Please specify both the layer it runs at and the kind of service it offers to the layer that is above it in the stack.
It is possible to describe an isochronous connection and a synchronous connection by comparing and contrasting these two kinds of connections.
Two columns are necessary in a datagram network, but four columns are required in a virtual-circuit network. Is there a rationale behind this? Is there a distinction in the types of addresses used by each network?