We plan to compare economically two design altérnatives (A añd B) Tor a heW Plde (the Scream Machine) at a theme park. Alternative A required a $300,000 investment, produced after-tax net annual revenue of $55,000, and had a negligible salvage value at the end of the 10-year planning horizon. Alternative B required a $450,000 investment, generated after-tax net annual revenue of $80,000, and also had a negligible salvage value at the end of the 10-year planning horizon. Based on an after-tax MARR of 10% and using a future worth analysis, which alternative, is the economic choice?

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Chapter17: Long-term Investment Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 3E
icon
Related questions
Question
Can some one please help me to solve the following question. Please and thank you
We plan to compare economically two design alternatives (A and B) for a new ride
(the Scream Machine) at a theme park. Alternative A required a $300,000
investment, produced after-tax net annual revenue of $55,000, and had a negligible
salvage value at the end of the 10-year planning horizon. Alternative B required a
$450,000 investment, generated after-tax net annual revenue of $80,000, and also
had a negligible salvage value at the end of the 10-year planning horizon. Based on
an after-tax MARR of 10% and using a future worth analysis, which alternative, is the
economic choice?
a) The do-nothing alternative will be selected.
O b) Alternative A and Future value will be calculated as follows:
FWA =-$300,000(F/P, 10%,10)+$55,000(F/A, 10%,10)=-
$300,000(2.59374)+$55,000(15.93742)=$98,436.10
O c) None of the above
d) Alternative B and Future value will be calculated as follows:
FWB =-$450,000(F/P, 10%,10)+$80,000(F/A, 10%,10)=-
$450,000(2.59374)+$80,000(15.93742)=$107,810.60
Transcribed Image Text:We plan to compare economically two design alternatives (A and B) for a new ride (the Scream Machine) at a theme park. Alternative A required a $300,000 investment, produced after-tax net annual revenue of $55,000, and had a negligible salvage value at the end of the 10-year planning horizon. Alternative B required a $450,000 investment, generated after-tax net annual revenue of $80,000, and also had a negligible salvage value at the end of the 10-year planning horizon. Based on an after-tax MARR of 10% and using a future worth analysis, which alternative, is the economic choice? a) The do-nothing alternative will be selected. O b) Alternative A and Future value will be calculated as follows: FWA =-$300,000(F/P, 10%,10)+$55,000(F/A, 10%,10)=- $300,000(2.59374)+$55,000(15.93742)=$98,436.10 O c) None of the above d) Alternative B and Future value will be calculated as follows: FWB =-$450,000(F/P, 10%,10)+$80,000(F/A, 10%,10)=- $450,000(2.59374)+$80,000(15.93742)=$107,810.60
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Depletion Allowance
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning