What would best explain why economics is important for understanding policies that deal with inequality and poverty? When a policy changes, people tend to change the way they behave. Poverty and inequality involve measuring income in currency. Economics gives strong moral reasons for dealing with these issues.

What would best explain why economics is important for understanding policies that deal with inequality and poverty? When a policy changes, people tend to change the way they behave. Poverty and inequality involve measuring income in currency. Economics gives strong moral reasons for dealing with these issues.

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter33: Income, Income Distribution, And Poverty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The trade-off between efficiency and equity is of great importance to economists. Why are economists so concerned about the impact of government policies and actions on efficiency and equity? Base your answer on economic theory.
Consider three ways of helping poor people to buy food, clothing, and shelter. The first way is to pass laws setting price ceilings to keep these basic goods affordable. The second is to have the government distribute coupons that give poor people a discount when they buy these necessities. The third is for the government to distribute income to poor people. Explain which programme is more likely to have a Pareto-efficient outcome, and explain why the other programmes are less likely to be Pareto-efficient.
How can Government intervention be required in order to redistribute money and wealth to increase opportunity and result in inequality. Can you use two pieces of evidence to explain why one being from the US Constitution and one from a foundational document of government policies. Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports the claim and respond to a possible opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Suppose that Simone believes that the progressive U.S. tax system is flawed because it supports equality of outcomes rather than equality of opportunity. Which redistributive philosophy is consistent with Simone's view? Libertarianism Liberalism Utilitarianism
Critically evaluate the below statement. "Policy makers have their individual desires (utility maximisation behavior) but they have to make policy decisions to improve social welfare in the society."
Because people respond to incentives,a. policymakers can alter outcomes by changingpunishments or rewards.b. policies can have unintended consequences.c. society faces a trade-off between efficiency andequality.d. All of the above.
According to social democracy, the role of the state in the economy is: some state ownership, regulation and a generally large welfare state. Group of answer choices True False
According to public choice theory, policymakers Group of answer choices place the interests of the public above their own self-interest. are likely to pursue their own self-interest, even if their self-interest conflicts with the public interest. act in ways to maximize economic efficiency. act in ways to bring about an equitable distribution of society's wealth.
Which one is better? Equality or Equity? Give an example in which the government has done such a thing.
Which of the following predictions is consistent with public choice theory? a. Voters always cast votes based on hard facts, not based on whether they like a candidate's personality. b. Legislation enacted is rarely a result of special interest legislation. c. Many voters will be uninformed on political and government issues. d. Voters always cast votes based on whether they like a candidate's personality, not on hard facts.
That theories are related to poverty or how the rise in food prices affect the vulnerable population?
Economists Henry Saffer of Kean University, Frank J. Chaloupka of the University of Illinois at Chicago, and Dhaval Dave of Bentley College estimated that the government must spend $4,170 on drug control to deter one person from using drugs and that the cost one drug user imposes on society is $897. Based on this information alone, should the government spend the money on drug control?