Which of the following correctly describes imperfect information? Select the correct answer below: a situation where one party has more information than the other regarding an economic transaction a situation where buyers and/or sellers lack necessary information to make sound economic decisions a situation where either the buyer or seller may have an incentive to hide information about a transaction from the other party O all of the above

Which of the following correctly describes imperfect information? Select the correct answer below: a situation where one party has more information than the other regarding an economic transaction a situation where buyers and/or sellers lack necessary information to make sound economic decisions a situation where either the buyer or seller may have an incentive to hide information about a transaction from the other party O all of the above

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285635101

Author:MCEACHERN

Publisher:MCEACHERN

Chapter14: Transaction Costs, Imperfect Information, And Behavioral Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10QFR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Because gun violence is portrayed frequently on television and in movies, people mistakenly assign too high of a probability that they will fall victim to gun violence and too low of a probability to more likely but less publicized events. This phenomenon illustrates which one? that events are poorly framed by the media. that people suffer from hindsight bias. the effect of the availability heuristic. the self-serving bias at work.
Researchers present participants a raffle for a trip to Hawaii in which 10 tickets in total are being sold. Most participants are willing to pay more for a first ticket if they had none or the tenth ticket if they had already had nine than they would pay for a fifth ticket if they already had four. Explain this phenomena in relation to behavorial economics.
Why might the multiple-play ultimatum game have a different result than the single-play ultimatum game? In the multiple-play ultimatum game, the first player generally offers less money to the second player than in the single-play ultimatum game. The multiple-play ultimatum game leads to a simpler equilibrium: the first player offers exactly half of the total sum to the second player. The multiple-play ultimatum game allows for players to send signals. Therefore, the receiver can punish a player who doesn’t share enough. The multiple-play ultimatum game generally results in less cooperation because both players fall into a back-and-forth pattern of trying to punish the other player.
Suppose that 2 roommates, Andy and Bob, are trying to pick an apartment in Chicago. Locations can be chosen from set of alternatives A={ x: x exists [0,1]}. Andy and Bob both want to minimize their daily commute but they work at different locations: Andy at xA=0.3, while Bob at xB=0.6. Specifically, their utility functions are: ui(x)= -(x-xi)2. Question: What is the set of all Pareto Efficient outcomes in A, assuming no money can be exchanged.
Anthony and Addie are playing the ultimatum game, starting with $100. The coin flip results in Anthony being the one to propose a division of the $100. Anthony proposes that he gets $99 and Addie gets $1. Which of the following statements is correct? a. Because the 99-1 split isn’t fair, Anthony should not make this offer. b. Conventional economic theory predicts that Anthony will propose a 99-1 split, just as he did. c. Experimental evidence suggests that Addie will accept the 99-1 split because, even though it isn’t fair, it’s better than nothing. d. Economic theory predicts that Anthony should choose a 60-40 split to maximize his payoff. Studies of human decision-making show that a. firms are less likely to maximize profits than consumers are to maximize utility. b. firms are more likely to maximize profits than consumers are to maximize utility. c. people are irrational more often than they are rational. d. people are reluctant to change their minds.…
In the market for used cars, there are two types of cars: bad cars, or good cars. The sellers know the qualities of the cars, and they value bad cars at $100 and good cars at $1000. The buyers cannot observe the quality of the cars, and they are willing to pay $100 for a bad car, and $1000 for a good car. Assume that buyers can only offer the same buying price forany car in the market (i.e., buyers cannot discriminate among sellers). What is the equilibrium price in such a market for used cars? a) $550b) $100c) $1000d) Between $100 and $1000e) This is a case of adverse selection. The equilibrium price cannot be determined.
Suppose Simon Petrikov decides to stop trying to capture princesses. This new policy will put Jake and Finn – who rescue princesses for a living – out of business, costing them a combined $100. However, Lumpy Space Princess and Princess Bubblegum each gain $75 from this new turn of events, as they save money in precautions. Simon’s new policy is: A. Pareto optimal B. Welfare-reducing C. Potentially Pareto improving/Kaldor-Hicks efficient D. Only Potentially Pareto improving/Kaldor-Hicks efficient if LSP and Bubblegum give Jake and Finn at least $100
d) Another classmate cares more about good grades: She gets 50 units of happiness for a B and 80 units of happiness for an A. If this classmate were your partner (but your preferences remained the same), how would your answers to parts (a) and (b) change? Which of the two classmates would you prefer as a partner? Would she also want you as a partner?
Kayla and Kevin are friends who go together to a used textbook seller who has two copies ofthe biology book that they both need for their class this semester. The cost to the seller ofacquiring the books was $25 each and no other students will need this book. Kayla states thatshe is willing to pay $40 for the book, while Kevin says he is willing to pay $80. Which ofthe following describes the most likely conclusion to this scenario? Group of answer choices The seller will sell the books to both Kayla and Kevin for $40 each because if they tried tocharge Kevin a higher price, Kayla would engage in arbitrage. The seller will sell one book to Kayla for $40 and one book to Kevin for $80 because thismarket meets all three requirements for price discrimination. The seller will sell the books to both Kayla and Kevin for $80 each because Kevin's highervalue exceeds Kayla's willingness to pay. The seller will sell the books to both Kayla and Kevin for $25 each because that is howmuch the…
Suppose Justine and Sarah are playing the ultimatum game. Justine is the proposer, has $140 to allocate, and Sarah can accept or reject the offer. Based on repeated experiments of the ultimatum game, what combination of payouts to Justine and Sarah is most likely to occur?.
Julie complains about the extremenoise in the factory. This is one of hygiene factors according to Herzberg Theory. True False Neither of the choices Either of the choices
Refer to the Ultimatum Game in Figure 17.7. Recall that the payoffs are monetary payoffs. a. Suppose that players only care about monetary payoffs, with $1 = 1 util. Find the subgame– perfect equilibrium. b. Suppose that players are imperfectly altruistic. They receive 1 util for each dollar they earn but = util for each dollar the other player earns.Write down the extensive form reflecting the new payoffs. Find the subgame–perfect equilibrium. c. Suppose that players are perfectly altruistic, receiving 1 util for each dollar in the sum of their earnings. Write down the extensive form reflecting the new payoffs. Find the subgame– perfect equilibrium. d. Suppose that players are perfectly selfless, getting 1 util for each dollar the other player earns but no utility for their own earnings. Write down the extensive form reflecting the newpayoffs. Find the subgame–perfect equilibrium. Does player 1 end up choosing the outcome that player 2 prefers?…