With respect to the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model, which of the following statements is most likely true? Under this model, it is possible for a predator to drive its prey to extinction. All of the statements are true. Non of the statements is true. This model predicts neutrally-stable predator-prey cycles, as opposed to a stable equilibrium. In this model, an increase in searching efficiency (a) will increase the maximum prey population.

With respect to the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model, which of the following statements is most likely true? Under this model, it is possible for a predator to drive its prey to extinction. All of the statements are true. Non of the statements is true. This model predicts neutrally-stable predator-prey cycles, as opposed to a stable equilibrium. In this model, an increase in searching efficiency (a) will increase the maximum prey population.

Biology (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781337392938

Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. Berg

Publisher:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. Berg

Chapter52: Animal Behavior

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15TYU

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What contributions have laboratory and mathematical models made to our understanding of predator–prey population cycles? What are the shortcomings of these modeling approaches? What are their advantages?
Using the lynx–hare interaction, explain in words the equations of the Lotka–Volterra model for the change in the population sizes of prey and predators.
In the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey equations, the term a b N prey N predator describes: The rate at which predators eat prey The rate at which new predators are added to the predator population The rate at which the predator population increases over time The intrinsic growth rate of the prey population
Because resources are limited, natural selection will favor organisms that acquire the most food and resources while expending the least energy, an idea called the optimal foraging theory. This theory is paired with another that more specifically explains patch movement and foraging behavior, which is named the marginal value theorem. true or false
Assume that for a given population of moose, the per-capita birth rate remains constant with population size. However, as the moose population size increases there is a linear increase in the probability of starvation and subsequent mortality due to intraspecific competition. a) On a single graph, draw the relationship between moose density and the per capita birth and death rates for this population. b) Assume that the population does not experience competition from other species, nor predation. Write out the equation that would best be used to describe the change in population growth from one time interval to another.
For the cricket, the intrinsic growth rate is 100 and the carrying capacity of the environment is 200,000 individuals. For the frog, the capture efficiency is 0.0002, the conversion efficiency is 0.1, the handling time per cricket is 0.2 hours, and the density-independent per capita death rate of the predator is 0.4. 18. At what value of the number of crickets is the predator population of frogs at equilibrium? 19. What is the dN/dt of the prey population when the number of frogs is 60 and the number of crickets is 11,000? Round to the nearest hundredth. 20. What is the dP/dt of the predator population when the number of frogs is 60 and the number of crickets is 11,000? Round to the nearest hundredth.
The eastern screech owl (Megascops asio) roosts in tree cavities. As long as there are enough tree cavities available for all the owls in the population, the number of tree cavities has no effect on per capita birth or death rates. If there are more owls than the number of tree cavities, the per capita death rate increases with increased population size (because of increased rates of predation or death by exposure). How does this scenario differ from the traditional idea of density-dependent population regulation, as described by Nicholson (1956) or Turchin (1995)? Does it make more or less sense, and why?
Which of the following conditions tend to destabilize populations (e.g. make extinctions more likely) for a predator and prey demonstrating Lotka-Volterra predator-prey dynamics? More than one food source (prey species) for the predator No immigration or emigration of the predator and prey The existence of prey refuges why option B is correct?
The long-term study by Krebs on the population dynamics of snowshoe hares and lynx has become a textbook example of predator-prey relationships. The population cycles he observed are the result of both biotic and abiotic factors affecting prey populations. List 3 factors that can contribute to population cycles and briefly explain their effects
Hyena carrying capacity in Mkomazi National Park is 500 (in the absence of competitors). Wild Dog carrying capacity in that park is 700 (in the absence of competitors). The addition of 1 wild dog to the park is equivalent to adding 2.5 hyena. The addition of 1 hyena to the park is equivalent to adding 0.4 wild dogs. Which of these species is the better competitor? Justify your answer quantitatively and illustrate your argument using an appropriate graph.
The lotka-volterra equation that describes rate of change in the predator population doesn't include intrisic rate for predators. How does it accomodate for growth in predators if the rate is missing?
Previous question: (Assume that for a given population of moose, the per-capita birth rate remains constant with population size. However, as the moose population size increases there is a linear increase in the probability of starvation and subsequent mortality due to intraspecific competition.) Assume that the population (from the previous question) does not experience competition from other species, nor predation. Write out the equation that would best be used to describe the change in population growth from one time interval to another.