You have collected a sub-sample from the Current Population Survey for the western region of the United States. Running a regression of average hourly earnings (ahe) on an intercept only, you get the following result: 1. (a). Interpret the result. = 0 = 18.58 (b). You decide to include a single explanatory variable without an intercept. The binary variable DFemme takes on a value of "1" for females but is "0" otherwise. The regression result changes as follows: = 1xDFemme = 16.50×DFemme What is the interpretation now? (c). You generate a new binary variable DMale by subtracting DFemme from 1, and run the new regression: = 2xDMale = 20.09xDMale What is the interpretation of the coefficient now? (d). After thinking about the above results, you recognize that you could have generated the last two results either by running a regression on both binary variables, or on an intercept and one of the binary

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Chapter4A: Problems In Applying The Linear Regression Model
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 5E
icon
Related questions
Question

Please no written by hand solution 

You have collected a sub-sample from the Current
Population Survey for the western region of the United States. Running
a regression of average hourly earnings (ahe) on an intercept only, you
get the following result:
1.
(a). Interpret the result.
= 0 = 18.58
(b). You decide to include a single explanatory variable without an
intercept. The binary variable DFemme takes on a value of "1" for
females but is "0" otherwise. The regression result changes as follows:
= 1xDFemme = 16.50×DFemme
What is the interpretation now?
(c). You generate a new binary variable DMale by subtracting DFemme
from 1, and run the new regression:
= 2xDMale = 20.09xDMale
What is the interpretation of the coefficient now?
(d). After thinking about the above results, you recognize that you could
have generated the last two results either by running a regression on
both binary variables, or on an intercept and one of the binary
variables. What would the results have been?
Transcribed Image Text:You have collected a sub-sample from the Current Population Survey for the western region of the United States. Running a regression of average hourly earnings (ahe) on an intercept only, you get the following result: 1. (a). Interpret the result. = 0 = 18.58 (b). You decide to include a single explanatory variable without an intercept. The binary variable DFemme takes on a value of "1" for females but is "0" otherwise. The regression result changes as follows: = 1xDFemme = 16.50×DFemme What is the interpretation now? (c). You generate a new binary variable DMale by subtracting DFemme from 1, and run the new regression: = 2xDMale = 20.09xDMale What is the interpretation of the coefficient now? (d). After thinking about the above results, you recognize that you could have generated the last two results either by running a regression on both binary variables, or on an intercept and one of the binary variables. What would the results have been?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation Coefficient
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning