Comparing Plato Essay

In this paper I will discuss how Plato 's Apology and Phaedo have difference ideas of what it means to be a philosopher. I will explain how in the Apology, the philosopher is wise in how he/she understand that they are wise because they know that they don 't know, and in Phadeo the philosopher knowledgable and are concern in gaining more knowledge. In Plato 's Apology we learn about Socrates life and who he really is. In platos Apology a philosopher is a wise person because he understands that

meaning. In this essay we will attempt to answer “What is Philosophy?” by discussing the works of Plato and Rene Descartes. First, we begin by summarizing and comparing the theme of their works for similarities so as to better form a definition. In order to begin answering the question, “What is Philosophy?” we must comprehend each author’s method, themes, and goals throughout their works. Plato, being a Socratic apprentice, followed and transcribed the experiences Socrates had in his teachings

1. In what sense do you think Plato means the prisoners in the Cave (den) to be like us? Plato is comparing us to the prisoners in the cave because we don’t want to accept the truth if it is against our traditional beliefs or against what we only see around us. Our thoughts and actions depend on what we see around us and in which environment we are growing up. For example, there aren’t any American football player in Nepal because nobody plays an American football there. One of my American friends

Throughout The Republic, Plato tries to paint a picture of a just man and an unjust man. Socrates is constantly challenged at both ends of the topic. Answering to the challenges Socrates describes an unjust man as happy on paper, and a just man happy and content in their soul. An unjust man in Socrates view is a rich man. An unjust man is only happy on paper but is that real happiness. An unjust man always wants more than he can obtain, and tries to gain it, when he cannot he is disappointed. An

Cooper wrote a piece called the Psychology of Justice in Plato. In the article, Cooper examined Plato’s theory of the just person’s psychology. Cooper’s main goal in the writing of this article was to find out what kind of person is just according to Plato, and to figure out whether it is correct or not. Cooper’s discussion was more about the Republican’s metaphysics rather than its political and moral theory. In this paper, I will be comparing Plato’s theory of a just individual’s psyche versus Cooper’s

Abstract Thesis: In The Republic, Plato argues that kings should become philosophers or that philosophers should become kings, or philosopher kings, as they possess a unique level of knowledge, which is required to rule the Republic successfully. The purpose of this essay is to examine whether or how far Plato’s argument that philosophers should be the rulers of the Republic is valid and persuasive. The majority of the essay will strictly be a survey Plato’s model of the Philosopher-King and the

others; he corrupts the young (Plato, Apology, 18c-19b, pg 47). While he is guilty of the first, second, fifth and sixth accusations, he is innocent of the third and the fourth. That Socrates is guilty by his own standards of being a busybody, or meddler, is proven by his way of discussing subjects by constantly asking questions, which can be quite meddlesome. “Doing one’s own work and not meddling with what is not one’s own” is Socrates’ own definition of justice (Plato, Republic, 433a, pg 139).

1 Principle of Specialization: A Positive Review of a Repulsive Feature While is it the belief of many that the Principle of Specialization is the most repulsive feature introduced to us by Plato in the Republic, the opposing argument is that the use of specialization is a great idea. Businesses aim to operate with as much productivity as possible while having very little waste, so why not our communities? The Principle of Specialization is present in all aspects of the community, from its humble

surface of its actual meaning. In this essay we will attempt to answer “What is Philosophy?” by discussing the works of Plato and Rene Descartes. First we begin by summarizing and comparing the theme of their works for similarities so as to better form a definition. We will then move on to develop our conclusion and hopefully gain a better understanding of “What is Philosophy?” Plato, being a Socratic apprentice, followed and transcribed the experiences Socrates had in his teachings and in his search

classical tradition of Greek philosophy. Plato was one of the first contributors to the many theories surrounding justice. Over the course of history many individuals expanded on his ideas to form their own theories. Of these individuals, many supported a utilitarian outlook. Jeremy Bentham, one of the earliest utilitarian’s, devised many theories on justice that are still held to high esteem today. These theories share much similarity to those devised by Plato, however they also display their differences