Constitutional Amendment Essay

Word Count: 2036 words How would the abolition of the Monarchy affect New Zealand’s constitutional structure? Abolishing the Monarchy in New Zealand would inherently call into question the issue of constitutional reform. New Zealand would need to consider having a written constitution. In this essay the focus will be on ‘Independence and a Written Constitution’ in relation to steps that may need to occur for New Zealand to become a Republic. I will reflect on the use of the word ‘may’ briefly as

The Arguments For and Against a Codified Constitution A constitution is a set of rules that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government, regulate the relationships between them, and define the relationship between the state and the individual. The most common way of classifying constitutions is to distinguish between codified and uncodified. The UK has an uncodified constitution. A written constitution is precisely a

The Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom An Analysis of Governments, Politics, and Society in the Region Conall P. MacKenzie FP230 Short Paper LCDR Rachael Gosnell 24SEP2015 Western Europe has grown exponentially since the colonial period, and the emergence of the Republic of Ireland and a unified United Kingdom has clearly shown that Europe’s boarders are constantly changing. Each nation has evolved in its own ways over the course of its existence, but both show many similarities

Most countries have a written constitution, which is a single document that delivers straightforward principles that practise public power and how they exercise that public power. Furthermore, it offers techniques and procedures of how the constitutional rules are enforced and how they can be changed. For New Zealand, we follow the United Kingdom and there Westminster system, as our constitution in “unwritten”. New Zealand’s constitution has always gained controversy, but the fact of the matter is

John Locke was one of the foremost political thinkers of the 17th Century. His ideas were very influential in the formation and upholding of ideas that have endured up until and including modern democracy. This essay will discuss the context in which Locke’s ideas arose, including his take on the state of nature. After this, key features of Locke’s social contract theory will be discussed, and their influence on historical and modern forms of democratic government will be covered. This includes ideas

institution. There are two main types of constitution; the written (codified) constitution and the unwritten (uncodified) constitution. Firstly, let me define what is meant by a written constitution. It is a formal document, stating the nature of the constitutional arrangement, the rules that govern the political system and the rights of citizens and the government institute in a codified form. According to the dictionary meaning, “Codified form” is to collect and arrange in a systematic form. That is, the

James Madison, an American statesman and political theorist that was present at the constitutional convention. Many of the ideas proposed by Madison are part of the reason that the Constitution has withstood the test of time. Madison was ultimately prepared to deal with one of the biggest problems this new government would face in his eyes, factions. Factions, which as defined by Madison are “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated

The impact of the French Revolution in Britain The given interpretation 'Between 1789 and 1815 supporters of the French Revolution posed no threat to the established order of Britain' suffers from a few problems . Firstly it suggests supporters posed ‘no serious threat’ however it does not elaborate on what a ‘serious’ threat actually is. Secondly it covers a 26 year period ‘1789-1815’ which is a long time and numerous things could change within this period, Britain goes to war with France and the

The Bill of Limits is the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The document was in response to the states that had a more anti-federalist view of government. These states wanted greater protection for individual liberties and restrictions to governmental power. The states also wanted

Why did absolute rulers believe in divine right? How did this put them at odds with the common people? Absolute rulers believed in divine right, where monarchs are given the power to rule by God and are responsible only to God. They held this belief because it set them apart from the citizens they governed and instilled a feeling of fear and respect among their subjects. It also helped ensure that no one would question their leadership. However, this put them at odds with the common people because