Essay on Federalism

Sort By:
Page 47 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Decent Essays

    From the time it was first proposed in 1789, the Bill of Rights was controversial. The founding fathers had already considered adding a Bill of Rights in the original 1787 Constitution, mainly because they knew the people feared a powerful central government and formally stating their rights in this new document would appease them. They did not add it, however, thinking it was not really necessary. Each state had their own version of a Bill of Rights anyway. The framers of the Constitution decided

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Politics After the American states drafted the Constitution, there were conflicting ideas concerning how the states should be governed. Some believed that a strong federal government should wield most of the governing powers, but there was another group that opposed a strong federal government. This group, known as the Republicans, believed that the majority of governing powers should reside in state legislatures. Republicans felt that the powers of the federal government should be limited

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin with, under Andrew Jackson the Democratic-Republicans took name of Democrats. The two parties, the Whigs and the Democratic Republicans, had generally opposite opinions on many issues. To begin with, their economic beliefs were opposite, especially on the existence of a national bank and the existence of tariffs because of their usual geographical location. The Whigs wanted a strong national bank and high tariffs in order to support their industries and manufacturing in the north. On the

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the 1830’s and 1840’s, tensions over the question between whether the government should be larger, or whether states should have the power? The book states that the federalists feared too much democracy, however the republicans feared a reversion of monarchy. Within this argument arose the first U.S party system between the federalist and the republicans. The federalist wanted a strong central government that would control military, economics and policies. Because of lessons learned under

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties were both influential parts in the founding of the United States of America. They differed in many things, but the main disparity between them was the way that each side wanted America to develop. The Federalists believed that the United States should be run by a strict central government while the Anti-federalists believed the opposite and wanted the power to go to the state governments. Federalists also believed in the ratification of the constitution

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federalists supported the United States Constitution. They supported removing powers from the states and allowing the powers to go simply into the hands of the U.S. national government. Federalists were pleased with the idea of dividing the powers among the different branches of government, such as the legislative, executive, and judicial courts. Moreover, the anti-federalists believe that the necessary political powers need to remain within the states. They want the legislative branch to hold

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What were the Antifederalists’ view of the new constitution? The Antifederalists’ did not want the new constitution because they had a fear that the government would become too powerful. They thought that the new constitution should contain a Bill of Rights. They wanted the Bill of Rights so it would protect and educate the citizens of the new government. They thought they would use the power to reduce the power of the states. They also did not like the idea of the President having the power to veto

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years of 1787 and 1789 American citizens had talked about the tough task these delegates had to accomplish, which was drafting the composed Constitution. The Constitution was questioned because delegates wondered if this Constitution would take the state's power and give the national government too much power? They also asked, would this allow the balance of liberty,equality, and justice to endure amongst each individual state government? As an Anti-Federalist we have a hard time deciding

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government and Statute Law 1a. True b. False c. True d. True e. True 2. The constitutional models of Great Britain and the United Sates were rejected at the time of confederation because in the United States they have a Constitution and Bill of Rights. John A. Macdonald saw this, but the United States was also fighting a civil war and he believed it was because the states had too much power and the government not enough. In Great Britain they use a one level, or unitary government system, but due

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The compromises between the large and small states and between the North and South. The compromise between the large and small states was decided in order to resolve difficult problems of representation. An idea was conceived by the grand committee (1 delegate for each state) headed by Franklin as chairman that to tackle each states representation problem. Each state should represent the lower house base on population. The key factor of representation would be based on the population of

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays