Existence of God Essay

it doesn’t necessarily reveal that a valid argument shares the same properties as sound ones. It is a bold attempt to clarify belief in God-- not with an appeal to evidence for his existence but rather with an appeal to self-interest. Pascal’s wager seeks to justify Christian faith by considering the various possible consequences of belief and disbelief in God, which failed to persuade me to be able to alter my mind. I regard this not only as an extremely far-fetched and ridiculous proposition,

becomes more philosophical. Nowadays, people argue that it is impossible to prove existence of anything. Even more, some philosophers delivered great speeches and wrote books to prove that 1+1=3, and the misconception in mathematics. Bertrand Russell delivered a lecture named “Why I Am Not a Christian” in March 6, 1927. In this essay, he made many criticisms against Christianity and questioned the existence of God. He presented many ideas about the fallacy inside of Christianity. Bertrand Russell’s

has perplexed humans through the ages is if we have the ability to reach God. The witness of Scripture and leading theologians attest that individuals have a limited knowledge of God through general revelation in the natural world. General revelation can provide valid knowledge that there is a God, which aids in the acceptance of special revelation. General revelation is an individual's ability to gain knowledge of God through his presence in the world. The knowledge we are able to gain through

and Apathetic agnosticism. All three don’t believe in a god, but are more or less open to the idea of there even being a god. The first type of Agnosticism is Strong Agnosticism. Strong Agnostics not only don’t believe in a god, but they would go as far to say that no one can or does know if any god exist. They argue that there is no clear evidence that a god exist. Strong agnosticism is hard to defend, because their definition of god and someone else's may be different as it would be with any

world. Whether it is Allah for the Muslims, Brahman for the Hindus, or God for Christians, it seems the notion of God is imbedded deep in the history of many different ethnicities and backgrounds. According to some studies a belief in a deity is innate, we are essentially hardwired to believe in God. Even from a young age we are taught “there is something more out there”, but is there? What proof is there? Has one every seen God? Is it ignorant to simply believe in something that has no proof? It is

the answer would have been not a sound argument as most children like myself growing up being told the story of Santa in which most of us believed in then. When replacing the word "Santa" with the word "God" is where it becomes a bit tricky. By replacing the word” Santa” with the word “God” in this instance, it should not change the argument being presented. To clarify, I am not saying that folks should agree

During the 1800th century, William Paley, an English philosopher of religion and ethics, wrote the essay The Argument from Design. In The Argument from Design, Paley tries to prove the existence of a supreme being through the development of a special kind of argument known as the teleological argument. The teleological argument is argument by analogy, an argument based on the similarities between two different subjects. This essay purposefully attempts to break down Paley’s argument and does so

The Enlightenment was a period where reason was utilized to answer questions, however, it was also a period in which religion was a huge part of society, especially under a monarch rule in which God had appointed a King and under his reign everyone followed his views. Years earlier, many began to question the church’s authority and split in views, giving rise to Protestants a division existing among Europe. Years later during the 18th century individuals began using reason to explain certain situations

independently of, experience. 1. god is by definition the greatest being possible. 2. A being who fails to exist in the actual world (while existing in other possible worlds) is less perfect than a being who exists in all possible worlds. Hence, God exists, necessarily. “maybe an ant cant conceive of a greater creature than an anteater, but that doesn’t mean that anteaters are the most perfect possible beings. “conceivablepossible” Aquinas-all PKG god. ((((1. Motion. Objects in motion

The Enlightenment was a period in which reason was utilized, however, it was also a period in which religion was a huge part of society especially under a monarch rule in which God had appointed a King and under his rule everyone followed his views. Years earlier, many began to question the church’s authority and split in views, giving rise to Protestants a division existing among Europe. Years later during the 18th century individuals began using reason to explain certain situations, many utilized