Tsar Nicholas Essay

The Russian Revolution of 1917, by definition, was a series of revolts against the Russian Tsar, Nicholas II. The background of the Revolution started with many political groups emerging in the 1800s and 1900s (Marxists, Liberals, Nationalists, and Peasant socialists being the most notable). Then, the Marxists split, forming Lenin and the Bolsheviks. On top of new political groups emerging, a slow in economy, a losing effort in wars, and the “Bloody Sunday” massacres also created unrest in Russia

fourth daughter of the last Tsar of Russia, to her playful personality, she loved to play tricks on her family and friends to the murderous, mysterious circumstances of her death at the hands of the Bolsheviks. Although Anastasia lived a privileged life, she did not have a say in her life due to her father being the Tsar of Russia. The parents of Grand Duchess Anastasia were Tsar Nicholas ii and his wife Alexandra. Anastasia’s father, Nicholas ii, was Russia’s final tsar, and was part of the Romanov

from the petition George Gapon hoped to present to Nicholas 11 on the 22nd of January 1905. Over 150,000 people signed the petition and on 22nd January, 1905, Gapon led a large procession of workers to the Winter Palace in order to present the petition. This excerpt presents the dreadful and harsh working conditions and overall standards of living of the working class and their families. In the beginning of the excerpt Gapon refers to Nicholas 11 as the “lord”, and states that he has come “to seek

revolution start? Well at the time it was 1917 and Russia were still in WWI. Tsar Nicholas was in power at the time. Tsar Nicholas at the time believed if he led Russia to victory in WWI, he would make Russia a better country. However those were not his ambitions because the country would grow weaker and weaker every day. He would practically not care about the country. His people grew angry with him because Tsar Nicholas

Nicholas II was known, not only for being the Emperor of Russia but also for his character and personality which undoubtably led him to his own downfall. Nicholas was often referred to as not being ready to become Tsar as well as being a weak leader. Firstly, Nicholas II himself, amongst a very large proportion of Russian society, believed that he was not prepared to be coronated Emperor. Nicholas himself stated “What is going to happen to me and all of Russia? I am not prepared to be a Tsar. I never

- Snowball and Leon Trotsky were both intellectuals that helped in not only social ideals but also as military strategists. During the Battle of the Cowshed, Snowball was the mastermind behind the organized attack which led the animals to victory. Similarly, Trotsky “proved to be an outstanding military leader, as he led the army of 3 million to victory” (Biography.com). Another resemblance between Trotsky and Snowball is that they are eventually exiled by the government. When the government felt

timeframe. The Tsars of this dynasty faced this challenge directly through foreign military conquests and economic and political reformation, yet a distinctive foundational element stayed true throughout their reign. Tsars of Russia consistently used a reverence for Orthodoxy to establish a continued persecution of minority religious groups within their control. The Jews bore the brunt of this persecution as they experienced strict laws governing their rights and constant threats of violence. Tsars throughout

for an enquiry into Nicholas II’s abilities and characteristics? Source 2 is an extract from the memoirs of Sergei Witte. He was the minister of finance from 1893-1903 and the minister of interior from 1905-1906. This means Witte was very close to Nicholas and was able to communicate with him very easily. Due to this alone we can tell that the provenacne of this source has potential value as Witte had contact to the Tsar frequently. However as Witte had been fired by the Tsar twice due to uncertain

was one of the main reasons for the breakout of revolution in 1917, however other factors can be brought about to suggest that it wasn’t only the main reason for the breakout of revolution in 1917. Aspects such as the decisions and actions of Tsar Nicholas can also be identified as important features for the breakout of revolution alongside the social and economic strains and the lack of political reform. All factors have characteristics to suggest that they were the main reason for the breakout

the actions of Nicholas the Tsar, the people’s living conditions, and the events leading up to the revolution.