Ad feminam

In the just war tradition, war was thought to be part of the moral world but had to meet certain criteria to be just. “The war had to create peace to protect human dignity and rights” (Himes, p. 85). There are seven points listed for the criteria for going to war. The first listed is making sure the war has a just cause. This means that there is a specific problem that needs to be fixed, or there is a reasonable defensive reason. A competent authority person, or a person of authority, needs to

Elyde Vargas RED ID: 817482127 PHIL 340 EXAM #1 1. A. According to Aquinas the 3 conditions for just war are: proper authority, a just cause, and a right intention. The first condition, proper authority, specifies that a war in order to be just must be declared by the authority of the head of a state. A declaration of war gives the opposite nation the opportunity to reconsider things and resolve the issue in a peaceful way. Only if the highest authority rejects or deny this opportunity a war is

Just War Theory Wars are fought for many reasons and I back then it use to be that to territories went to war to gain land for their country and that was the usually justification. People also go to war because they believe in different things and they see each other as “less than human” so they be. The reading stated the war is a last resort option for most. Some important principles of a just war are the non-violent options must be considered first. Also war cannot be declared unless it is by

According to Bensel, “just war theory is a theory that grapples with questions of when it is just to go to war and acceptable methods for fighting a war” (Bensel, 2012, pg. 1). During a just war, innocent people should not be victimized. Only a certain amount of force should be used during the war. People should follow any international agreed conventions. According to Bensel, “in this way, just war theory struggles with the possibility of creating peace through force” (Bensel, 2012, pg. 1). The

Syrian civil war started in 2011 was the outcome of the opposition against the President Bashar al-Assad regime. The uprising emerged as a response to the Arab spring movement that lead to regime change in Tunisia and subsequently turned into mass unrest rooted into the discontent with long-term dictatorship and poor economic situation in the country (Manfreda, n.d.). The number of Syrian citizens killed in the civil war reached 140000 since March 2011 (SBS 2014). The European Commission (2014, 2)

about how distribution of condoms in schools can lead to teenage promiscuity and encourages sexual activity at an early age. Limbaugh’s use of Reductio ad absurdum counter attacks the opposition’s argument on condom distribution and is effective since it is hard to attack the opposition. Limbaugh attempts to refute his opposition with a reduction ad absurdum argument. He uses rhetoric example intended to demonstrate his belief that condoms distributes and promotes sexual activity. He provides his

Comparing these attitudes to the Just War Doctrine displays this change towards morality. The Just War Theory serves as a guideline for determining a war as moral. The Doctrine consists of three major principles that contain the criteria of just war. Jus ad bellum outlines the situations in which it is acceptable for a nation to go to war before any action has taken place. This includes that war must be directed towards a real and moral cause, authorized by qualified leaders, planned to settle the intended

In a world of love and peace, there is also war; to be specific, there are three types of wars, and I identify with realism. Realism is shown to be the view that suggests that war happens, and perhaps it needs no reason to be justified and violence will occur. Mentioning that, just war, another theory, is a three-part view that shows the reasoning prior to a war, the concerns during and after war, and essentially requires the person to see what difference the war could make. While, pacifism, another

just. The theory has evolved for thousands of years and modern theorists, such as Michael Walzer, author of Just and Unjust Wars, puts forth criteria for a just war, such as jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Jus ad bellum includes reasons for going to war, and jus in bello deals with the people who wage war. The criteria in jus ad bellum include; just cause, declaration by a proper authority, right intention, a reasonable chance of success, the end proportional to the means, and war as a last resort. Jus

right. All of these additions and refinements lead to the same just war theory that we are familiar with today (Baer, 2006). According to James Pattison, just war theory covers many conditions and splits itself into two categories: one of them is jus ad bellum, which