Battle tactics

Question2: In Carnage and Culture Victor David Hanson expressed a slanted perspective about the crucial battles in western history in order to support his theory that western militaristic strategies are superior to alternative forms of warfare. He fostered his sentiments by explaining how specific battle tactics can unify or divide a nation in a matter of moments. However, his reference to the concept that western warriors continuously triumph in war, is expressed in a manner that does not fully

Parker suggests the western way of war can be abridged into five characteristics: technology, discipline, aggressive military action, finance, and innovation. Parker proposes that the western way of war facets significantly altered the preparation for battle and the outcomes on the battlefield. A prime example is the great Napoleon Bonaparte during his conquest to dominate the continent of Europe. The characteristics of the western way of war that are best characterized during the Napoleon era are discipline

Today in time guerrilla warfare is used by one of the strongest armies of the world. These tactics were used even back during the revolutionary war. In the movie the Patriot, this movie portrays the fight during the revolutionary war and the battles and the horror they faced. The battlegrounds used in the war were a person's backyard. This new idea of guerilla warfare brought to the war was unconventional and efficient. There were small militias taking out countless redcoats. Although it wasn't the

troops to ensure efficiency and effectiveness of the entire units. Confusion of formations and chain of command during battle can be devastating to any unit. Uniformity is crucial in minimizing losses and the number of casualties in battlefields. Similarly, it is neccesary to avoid conflict of interest among soldiers of the same troop and with allies. This war being a collaborative battle among allies thus required the highest level of collaboration and cooperation. Proper training was thus important

the transformation of technology and the role it played in war. However, one must question whether it was the role of technology alone that changed warfare or if other factors were equally influential, these include; economic power, strategies and tactics, leadership, organisation and public attitudes. Following the Industrial Revolution which acted as a catalyst for the mass production of new weaponry, the 19th

know the enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories” was a quote from the world renowned Chinese General and military strategist, Sun Tzu. I believe this quote speaks in multitudes to the basic fundamentals of tactics. To be successful in any battle, it is important that I not only know my strengths and weaknesses but those of my enemy as well. Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication (MCDP) 1-3 provides seven pillars that provide a solid foundation of military tactics. All seven topics are equally

Colonel Dave Richard Palmer and Major Albert Sidney Britt III. The textbook gives an insight into the military tactics and the political reasons when they were brought about in the 17th and 18th centuries. The text was published in West Point, New York in 1969. The book contains 9 chapters and 185 pages. There is no additional information on the authors. The book starts with the tactics and life of the young Swedish King Gustavus Adolphus, who began his military career at the age of 16 on the battlefields

Throughout the ages of history, there were many wars that were fought. For every victory and defeat, what was it that really determined the outcome of the war? Which army leader had the better or worse battle plan? With the plan they had, did it increase their chances of victory? Were there key factors in an army leader’s plan that lead to their defeat? Or, was the best decision made to completely avoid war? For a lot of the wars that took place and the ones that were avoided many years ago

The Napoleonic era foresaw the potential for use of a variety of arms, improved military tactics and strategies; however, failing to utilize the approach and maximize use of tactical resources to warfare is an illustration of ineffective tactical leadership. The Napoleonic era is fundamentally similar to warfare practiced today; specifically the integration of combined arms, adaptability of basic military tactics and strategies, consideration of operational environment and logistical planning on the

separated the Battle at Waterloo and the Battle at the Somme, and despite that time gap certain social and military aspects have been able transcend time. John Keegan’s The Face of Battle, detailed the experiences of both battles from a British perspective. Within that one hundred year span many facets of war changed, the tactics, the machinery, the tools, the soldiers and the very cause of the battle itself. Despite the stark contrasts of each, it was the similarities in experience and tactics that were