Existence of God

not to be trusted. He discusses the existence of material objects, God, and himself. God exists and allows deception and Descartes’ ability to recognize that everything is false proves that he exists as well. He explains the difference between imagination and intellect, as well as the idea that the senses are deceptive and that knowledge comes from the mind and reason. Descartes’ belief in God allows him to solidify his own existence, as well as the existence of material objects. Descartes, in the

The Ontological Argument was proposed by a man named St. Anselm in which he used this argument to prove this existence of God by utilizing an a priori reasoning. The argument does not provide any kind of physical evidence, but instead the argument is made through thoughts and logic. The ontological argument takes the idea of God to show that God must exist in understanding according to Anselm. In other words, Anselm suggests that the greatest conceivable being must exist because that being must

God’s existence is a work of art resulting from philosophical argumentation. An ontological argument for the existence of God is one that attempts the method of a priori proof, which utilizes intuition and reason alone. The term a priori refers to deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the type of reasoning that proceeds from general principles or premises to derive particular information. The argument works by examining the concept of God, and arguing that it implies the actual existence of God;

The Inadequacy of the Argument from Design William Paley’s teleological argument (also known as the argument from design) is an attempt to prove the existence of god. This argument succeeds in proving that while existence was created by an aggregation of forces, to define these forces, as a conscious, rational, and ultimately godlike is dubious. Although the conclusions are valid, the argument makes several logical errors. The teleological argument relies on inductive reasoning, rendering the argument

the epicenter of heated debate. When St. Thomas wrote this section of his ground breaking essay what he ultimately was claiming, was that through philosophy and observation, there is a way to see how the natural world points to there in fact being a God. Although to some it may seem absurd, modern day science based upon observation and experimentation, does not completely discredit or debunk the first, second, third, and fifth arguments from St. Thomas Aquinas’s Five Ways, but rather it suggests substantial

Respond to the following quotation: “The Holocaust shows not only that religious faith is untenable but also that life is absurd. A powerful and loving God could not create a world in which such events are possible. Religion is wishful thinking -- ‘Fear created the first gods’ (Caecilius Statius, 2nd c. BCE). Moreover, life itself contradicts the most basic of human aspirations: to live without suffering and cruelty.” Etty herself discusses these issues, so in responding be sure to show that you

Worldview, which is defined as “the framework from which we view reality and make sense of life and the world,” and this is specifically shown through the “Does God Exist” debate between Dr. Gordon Stein and Dr. Greg Bahnsen. Both men debated sophistically and articulately, and established their differing stances on the question: Does God Exist? Both Bahnsen and Stein verbalized their thesis’ and main points to support their claims. Ultimately, by the end of the debate Dr. Bahnsen covers all of the

God as “that than which nothing greater can be thought of” implies that God must possess every level of perfection. Perfection, and God in particular, transcends the sensible realm and requires an understanding of a concept for which we cannot have sensations or experiences. In order for humanity to understand God as a whole, they must use their rationality and draw first from nature to define a provisional idea of God. Causes are answers to questions. These questions can encompass the causes

God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist The existence or otherwise of God has attracted a seeming countless debates from all classes of people mainly academics, comprising theologians, scientists and philosophers, not to mention laypersons. Consequently, this singular topic has generated many publications and reviews. Of particular interest are the two opposing views brilliantly presented by William Lane Craig, a popular Christian philosopher and apologist who is Research Professor of Philosophy

article, McCloskey referred to proofs as arguments that “definitively establish the case for God,” and since they fail, according to his analysis, theists should abandon these proofs. However, there seems to be a misunderstanding concerning the word “proof”. While clarifying how to approach of God’s existence, Professor Foreman revealed that people should not try to use the word “proof” in regards to God’s existence since it implies certainty and derives from mathematics (i.e., where a mathematician attempts