Extraterrestrial hypothesis

true or false statement? Clearly explain your answer in a short paragraph. (5 points) False, the scientific method is limited to those phenomena which can be observed or measured. Due to the need to have completely controlled experiments to test a hypothesis, science cannot prove everything. Science is meant to give us a better understanding of the mysteries of the natural world. So with that being said science is good at explaining “how things work” but not necessarily for explaining “why do such things

results mainly do support the original hypothesis. Throughout the 8 days of experiment, there was no lead, bacteria, or sodium detected by the test kits or the test strips that were used in any of the waters of the water bottle brands and tap water in both environments thus proving the hypothesis that was originally posed, correct. This was the same for the tap water from Quincy, Massachusetts in both environments, thus not supporting the original hypothesis of the belief of traces of lead or bacteria

Measures: The independent measure in the study is the PrEP treatment while the dependent variable in the study is change in sexual behavior over the course of the study. The PrEP treatment will be given both of the comparison groups and will remain constant throughout the study. The purpose of the study is to measure any change in the two comparison groups between each period gap and overall at the end of the study. At each interval, the participants will go through a mixed methods research analysis

Discussion Previously in the experiment, there were three possible alternative categories that were used for performance on a visual search task for the participants. The three categories show a similar pattern of enhanced detection of control, congruent, incongruent trials. Making a comparison of paired samples t-test between control vs. congruent, control vs. incongruent, control vs congruent and congruent vs incongruent. By showing great benefits and advantages for selective attention in control

First post 1. What differences did you observe between the corn seeds and the teosinte seeds? An obvious difference which was distinguished was the size of of the sides where the teosinte seeds were smaller while the corn was larger. It was harder to find where to position the teosinte then the corn too. The corn seemed to make the choice towards the wet sponge more. 2. Did the corn seeds behave differently from the teosinte seeds? In which ways? The corn seeds were more likely to choice the wet

My hypothesis was supported in the experiment due to the fact that caffeine raised the beats per minute, while kava drastically decreased the amount of heart beats in a given minute. By looking at figure 1 you are able to see that kava decreased the heart rate by -46 beats per minute, while the caffeine raised the beats to 26 per minute. This supports the conclusion that the stimulation humans receive off of caffeine has a similar effect in Daphnia Magna. Caffeine raises the beats per minute in each

Our experiment consists of trying to figure out the heating temperatures of different types of proteins. The proteins we tested were albumin (eggs), casein (milk), and keratin (hair). For the experiment we did six different tests. We tested powdered milk twice, eggs twice, and hair twice. The steps of my experiment consists of first gathering the materials, we will then cook the two proteins for until they are fully denatured. We will then record the information gathered in the experiment. As we

compositions of all three types of sandwich cookie. We will then compare the percent composition of each cookie to the other cookies and to our hypothesized percent compositions to see how similarly the brands and recipe make their cookies and if our hypothesis was correct. Based on the percent compositions we calculate, we can discuss why manufacturers would make their cookies with those ratios of ingredients, taking into account the cost of each ingredient, which may cause manufacturers to put less of

of the labs was a diffusion lab to prove the concept in its entirety, and the second lab was over a “naked” egg and how it changed in shape. We can say that all of the changes present in each lab was due to diffusion. These labs both proved our hypothesis’ wrong or right. First there was the diffusion lab. In this lab we tested a bag of starch and iodine. First we put some starch into a bag and then put it into the beaker full of water with iodine. We predicted a lot of things. First, if the bag

They are crustaceans. Isopods live in the sea, or on land. We tested the effect of dark and light on isopods performance. The independent variable is light versus dark. The dependent variable is the number of isopods on each side of the chamber. My hypothesis was, if they choose dark or light, the number of isopods Material Chamber 10 isopods 1 sorting brush Stop watch Aluminum foil Procedure Cover one side of the