Formal concept analysis

2.7.2 Formal Concept Analysis Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), also known as Galois lattice mining, is a branch of lattice theory that allows identification of meaningful groupings of objects that have common attributes (Wille, 2009; Ganter & Wille, 2012). It is a data analysis method which enables the discovery of hidden knowledge in the data in the form of concepts. Godin, Gecsei, and Pichet (1989) have demonstrated the effectiveness of using FCA for indexing and retrieval as an alternative to hierarchical

In this section, we present a brief background on security design patterns and FCA. 2.1. Security Design Patterns Christopher Alexander first introduced the concept of design patterns for use of living spaces, in his book ‘A Pattern Language’, published in 1977 [3]. The concept of a pattern was adopted by the software community in the book ‘Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software’, published in 1994 whose authors Gamma, Helm, Johnson, and Vlissides are known as the ‘Gang of

Confidentiality is a concept of vast importance for professionals in the medical field. It is a professional obligation in this field and is considered to be an ethical concept that falls in line with integrity, compassion, veracity, charity, and fidelity as explained in both the International Council of Nurses Code for Nurses (1973) and the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics (1985). However, in today’s ever growing world of technology and demand for information, challenges continue to arise

1. Sociological Concept: The book defines private troubles as, “problems we face in our immediate relationships with particular individuals in our personal lives” (Witt, 2016, p. 3). Example: The example I found for private troubles are flyers posted on every bulletin board in every work center at Eielson Air Force Base. The flyers are made by the base chaplain and mental health clinic. The flyers are there to provide the phone numbers of people to contact who can help with private troubles. Sociological

interpretation of Kant. We have mentioned at the outset, the essential division for formalist and non-formalist is in their understanding C1 as a ‘formal’ accomplishment or not. So far we have seen the formalist holds out for the preeminence of universalzation in the hierarchy of principles, i.e. the buttressing rules Rawls or O’Neill posed. Now we are to see how

Question 1 Communication across Computime is lacking. According to Wolcott and Lippitz, Computime lacks formal communication channels between Research and Development (R&D) and business unit engineers (2008). If the R&D unit is unaware of how Computime’s customers are innovating a product, how can the department anticipate needs and make adjustments prior to unveiling a new product? Communication needs addressed. Chinese engineers “tend to be less accustomed to sharing problems, offering ideas

Hart’s concept of the existence of a legal system is made out of these three differences. Behind the concept is a structure built with great care. Thus far perhaps this Article has injured only the surface of the network and has not yet come to grasps with Hart’s concept of law. Rolf Sartorius would agree, for he contends that Hart’s two minimum conditions for the existence of a legal system “establish nothing more than purely formal criteria for the existence of a legal system. As such, they could

communication, as distinguished from formal languages (such as computer-programming languages) or constructed languages (such as Esperanto). It focuses on the reasoning and argument one finds in personal exchange, advertising, political debate, legal argument, and the social commentary that characterizes newspapers, television, the Internet and other forms of mass media Symbolic Logic Symbolic Logic is the study of symbolic abstractions that capture the formal features of logical inference. It explains

PART ONE Part a) Dear Andy, I am sorry to hear about the issues you are having at your branch; after careful analysis I have decided to discuss stakeholder analysis to look at the issues and offer recommendations on how they could be remedied.( It is obvious that there has been a clear breakdown in the relationship between management and staff which has underlying causes such as low pay,( lack of training for junior staff and Night Managers.( I believe that the pay and training issues

Peter Checkland and Brian Wilson are both systems thinkers who contributed to the development of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). Although both systems thinkers began developing concepts of SSM around the same time, Checkland is considered the pioneer of SSM. Checkland’s SSM was designed for solving general social problems, while Wilson adopted the methodology for business management by developing enterprise model building. The underlying principle for Checkland’s SSM and Wilson’s SSM is that it