Government of India

With many different religious, ethnic, and social groups, the Republic of India is a unique and diverse state. Since gaining independence, India has faced a challenge of encouraging the variegated people within its borders to embrace and celebrate a common Indian identity even while nurturing their distinct cultures and traditions. This diversity is reflected throughout social and political challenges in Indian society. Although the different federal states are given a certain amount of leeway to

as a concept, is as old as civilisation; growing and developing itself according to time and space. It is the process of decision making and the process by which decisions are implemented. Democracy is considered as one of the best forms of the government which ensures and promote the basic human values and rights such as justice, equality, liberty and fraternity. For Aristotle, freedom is the underlying principle of democracy and only in a democracy the citizens can have a share in freedom. There

Introduction: The Constitution (Seventy-Third Amendment) Act, 1992 was enacted to reform the Panchayat System in India. The Legislature of Indian States were given powers to determine the powers and composition of Gram Sabha and Gram Panchayats. Hence, the powers, functions and composition of Gram Panchayats are determined by the State Governments in accordance with the local needs. Gram Sabha Gram Sabha has been envisaged as the foundation of the Panchayati Raj system. A village having population

INTRODUCTION Panchayati Raj is mainly found in countries like India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh. In Indian Sub continent it is the oldest system of government. The word Raj means to rule and the word panchayat means assembly. The panchayat or the assemblies settled fights between the individuals and the village disputes. Sarpanch or Mukhiya is the main leader or head of the panchayat. The System of Panchayati Raj was introduced by the constitutional amendment in 1992. It is based upon the

FDI IN DIGITAL INDIA Dr. Shobha Edward,M.C.S.,M.Phil.,P.G.D.P.M.&L.L.,P.G.D.C.S.M.,D.L.T.,Ph.D., Associate Professor, Principal i/c & Head of the Department of Corporate Secretaryship, K.C.S.Kasi Nadar College of Arts & Science. Email: shobhaedward@gmail.com _________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Digital India is an initiative of Government of India to integrate the government departments and the people of India. Digital India mission is expected to

Comparing the Governments and Economies of China, India, Japan, and Korea The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast the government and economies of four countries in Asia: China, India, Japan, and Korea. Topics that will be discussed are their governments, economies, resources, and citizens. China China, officially the People’s Republic of China, is a single-party state, meaning there is only one political party. China was founded on January 1, 1912. The per Capita GDP for the

According to the case analysis, the ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India began in 2001 when the government stated that it would be putting forth a discussion on whether or not a bill should be passed banning Tobacco Companies from advertising their products and sponsoring sports and cultural events. It was widely debated by both sides both ethically and morally, and substantial points were made both for and against the subject. I will give a summary of the reasons and justifications both

1. The Government of India (GOI) proposed ban on tobacco advertising was not unusual keeping in view the international precedents. Countries like France, Finland, and Norway had already imposed similar bans. An example is Belgium whose Supreme Court (of Appeal in 1981, gave its ruling that a ban on tobacco advertising was not unconstitutional. In a case which started in 1991 and ended in 1997, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, marketer of Camel cigarettes, was forced to withdraw its mascot, Joe Carmel

Amity School of Communication AMITY UNIVERSITY RAJASTHAN Effects and implications of coalition governments on the political scenario in India Abstract: Parliamentary democracies ruled by multiparty cabinets make foreign policy decisions in a fairly unique institutional context, complicated by the politics of coalition government. Recent research suggests that this context is associated with foreign policy behaviors that are quite distinct in character from foreign policy made by single party cabinets

1) Currently, the government of India counts on two main laws to solve the issue of corruption, the Criminal Law of the PRC and the Law Against Unfair Competition of the PRC. The first law, also known as common bribery, applies to the bribery of state officials and employees of state owned enterprises, which are most of China’s large companies. Under this law, anyone who demands or accepts money or property in return for benefits is guilty of bribery. The second law is known as commercial bribery