Infanticide

Western sources concerning female infanticide begin in 1579, with the arrival in China of the first European missionaries. They brought them a wholly different perspective on infanticide from that of the chinese, one shaped by Christian doctrine; “shaped by thousands of images of the Madonna and child, infanticide inspired horror in European eye when it was encountered in China.” (Mungello, 2008) A flood of morbid reports detailing the furtively condoned practice was generated by these new arrivals;

Michael Tooley's article, "Abortion and Infanticide" raised some points about the morality of abortion. He discussed the conservatives' ethical objection against abortion which states that fetuses and infants have a right to life. The conservatives believe that early abortion is immoral. In his article, he made a case against the conservative position on abortion. His case boils down to two claims: (i) We should accept that early abortion is immoral only if we accept the "potentiality principle"

Female Infanticide Sixty million female children go missing in Asia because of female infanticide and abortions. Little girls are getting killed off because of their gender. Women prefer boys instead of girls so the girls get aborted before they are even born, but for the unlucky ones that don't get aborted they are usually killed once they are born and this is known as female infanticide. There is an example of female infanticide in the novel Unwind by Neil Shustrman, with his character

Over the course of time, selective infanticide has been heavily debated and surrounded by much controversy. Harriet Johnson’s piece “Unspeakable Conversations” navigates through the discourse between Johnson and selective infanticide advocate Peter Singer. Real world applications of the social and medical model of disability are embedded all throughout Johnson’s personal account of her encounters with Singer, causing audiences to think of these models in ways other than textbook applications. The

Infanticide: Reasonable Charge, or a Violation of Human Rights Before infanticide was considered a criminal charge under the Canadian Criminal Code, women were punished to the full extent of the law for murdering their children, even though many had no control over their actions at that time. Overtime, societal values altered how many people may feel or think when discussing a woman murdering her child. Once it became common knowledge that the issue of infanticide was something that needed to be

Coeducation and single-sex education are both extensively used around the world. By the 1980s, more and more schools which only severed male or female became coed. Even though, many parents still send their kids to only men school or only women school now days. Then why would some people choose a only men or only women school? Is it against the “gender equality”? In the early civilizations, education was informally and it was primarily households. As time passed, people began to get educated more

The evolution of infanticide has been researched by many scientists. It has been found that infanticide evolved as a mating strategy fore males. (Boyko & Marshal, 2009). Boyko and Marshall (2009), explain that males will use infanticide when taking over a new group or for bonding with a new female. It is an adaptive strategy that males use to reduce the time they have to wait fore females to be able to have his offspring (Boyko & Marshall, 2009). Broom, Borris & Koenig (2004) explain a similar hypothesis

the female infanticide is not a morally justifiable practice. I do not agree that killing these innocents outweighs the benefits it has to their society. Many arguments that support female infanticide use the Cultural Relativism theory to defend their claim. Cultural Relativism is a theory that depicts how we all have different cultures and different moral codes, therefore, it is impossible to judge another 's culture from our own perspective (EMP, 19). In this way, female infanticide is justified

Defense of Abortion and Infanticide, author Michael Tooley’s main argument/thesis is that fetuses or unborn babies do not possess the right to life under the basis that it does not “possess the concept of continuing self or mental substance” (Vaughn 316). By this conclusion he states that the possibility of the fetus reaching the requisite concept in the future does not qualify as an excuse to deny abortion. He emphasizes that this supports that abortion and early infanticide are morally justifiable

After reading a selection of Greco-Roman mythology, it would not take one long to come across an instance of infanticide. Being just the way our own culture is, the volume of myths that have infanticide is surprising, since our culture places such a huge value on human life especially at young age. Most of these instances are caused by one of two sentiments, the first being revenge as seen when Hera tries to kill Hercules in the crib. The second is self-preservation. The majority of times a child