Jury Duty Essay

System of decision making in the court is in need of significant reform, if the nation’s present and future need for fair justice is to be met. Contents Introduction 2 The Current Jury System (explanation) 2 Strengths of the Current Jury System (Analyse and critique) 3 Weaknesses of the Current Jury System (Analyse and critique) 3 What Legal alternatives are there? 5 Stake Holders & Justification of changing the system. 6 Conclusion 6 Recommendations 6 Bibliography

for other reasons. Once they are convicted they are summoned to court, this begins the jury process. Citizens are randomly chosen to serve on jury duty. The citizens on the jury will use the jury system to determine if the person being accused is guilty or innocent. Trials can become very long or they can be short it just depends on the topic and how long it takes to decide on what the consequences will be. The jury system is the main trial and the main decision of whether or not someone is right or

someone say they have to go do jury duty? You may wondered what jury duty is. Well jury duty is service as a member of a jury in a court of law. You may say well what is a jury? A jury is a body of people sworn to give to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. In this paper we will talk about three counties and how their jury system goes. And if they don’t have one we will talk about what they do for their judicial system. Jury system makes the court’s trial

A jury is defined by a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment. The jury dates back to the Magna Carta in England, when it was said that no free man shall be imprisoned except by lawful judgement of his peers. The word ‘peer’ comes from a latin word meaning equal. These early jury trials were, however, based on tests of ‘good faith’ rather than on the facts in a legal dispute

I believe our present jury system is satisfactory the way it is and should not be altered in any way. Legal personnel already know when the laws are updated, so making a change would not do anything but cause confusion among the public (Terrill, 2016). If the United States has been abiding the United States Constitution since the mid 1700’s, there is no need to alter it now (Hans & Vidmar, n.d.). As stated by Hans & Vidmar (n.d.), “The Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

Juries in NSW The jury system plays a very important part in the running of the courts. The jury system is needed in both criminal and civil cases. There are advantages of the jury system as well as disadvantages. However, the jury system is still very important to the justice system. The role of the jury in NSW A jury is a group of people from the community with all sorts of backgrounds, beliefs, religions, education levels and ages, who listens to the

The Jury System in Western Australia Trial by jury throughout Australia, originates from the British judicial system. Britain’s control of many colonies, including Australia, during the period of the British Empire, was influential in forming a judicial system in the colonies, based on its own. Trial by jury is an important and integral part of the legal system. Many of our legal traditions, such as the number of members of a jury being twelve, originated from Britain. The jury is an important

Jury Selection Jury Selection of the 1930’s was very racially bias and prejudice towards the African American race by the white society. Also the men of white society minimized women's rights by not letting them participate in the jury. The jury selection process has changed vastly from the 1930’s until now. It is more complex and safe and open to all race and gender, people can’t just be on the jury there is a selection process for it. I believe that in 1933, Tom Robinson was unjustly charged

criminal trial process and the system of sentencing and punishment, the inefficacy is considered extensive. The three key respective areas in which the balance of rights proves controversial are bail and remand which favours community rights, the role of juries, favouring the victim’s rights, and the use of different penalties favouring offender rights. In regards to rights of victims, offenders and society, the controversial issue of bail and remand given to criminals provides an unclear balance of rights

Firstly, i want to touch on the subject of religious beliefs. Is that a good enough reason to not serve on a Jury? I do not believe so. Yes, the bible does tell us not to judge each other, because we all have sinned. But, does being a juror really means passing judgement in that sense? When a group of people participate on a jury they are usually presented with evidence, testimony from eye witness and/ or expert testimony, from professionals, such as psychologists. So, it is really judgement based