People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who argued that reason is the source of morality. He had a few categorical imperatives which consisted of universalizability, using people as an end in itself rather than as a means, and formulation of autonomy. In his imperative of universalizability, he strongly believed that an act is only morally right if it can be universalized and applied to every situation. For example, if it was morally right for someone to lie, then it should be morally right for everyone

especially when it comes to the treatment of animals. The group PETA which stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is know as the largest animal rights group in the world. With an estimated three million members and supporters the organization believes that “ Animals are not ours to eat. Wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way” and fights to protects those rights of animals (PETA). PETA was founded in March 1980 by animal rights activist Alex Pacheco and

you know that animals have rights also just like you do? Animals have been abused in many ways not in just testing them in cosmetics but in their fur and meat. Some animals are also fighting animals like rosters and pit bulls. They made it where you can get fined or even get prisoned time for abusing an animal. Also they have been testing animals to avoid testing on the human, they are testing drugs on this animals and produces. Animal testing’s has become a big issues in animal abuse, just because

(1879-1955). Animal testing is an issue in today 's general public that, regardless if anybody understands it, does influence each of us. Is some some testing needed by law? Medical advances, for example, transplants, antibodies, and drugs were all tried on animals before they were utilized on people. However, does government law guarantee that creatures utilized as a part of examination and testing are dealt with compassionately? Today

Animal Testing: The Inhumane Treatment of the Innocent As human beings, we all have basic rights. Animals, on the other hand, do not get a choice in what is done to them. Animals being used for research dates back to the 1500s. It is estimated that 26 million are used for commercial or scientific research every year. People often disagree on whether animals should have rights. Though they are without a voice, they still have feelings and suffer from pain just as humans do. There are better alternatives

fashion industry have an ethical responsibility to change the situation. Usage of animal Fur Fashion industry is infamous for using animal fur and the inhumane treatment of animals. Fur is acquired either by trapping wild animals and skinning them or by raising animals domestically for their fur. Consumption New line of clothing every year encourages

the major supporters of this treatment come from the emotionally standpoint of couples who have struggled with giving birth to a healthy child. As noted in the article by Pritchard (2014), a mother who has lost seven children, whether through miscarriages or early deaths, claims that she would have received the mitochondria replacement had it been approved. In contrast, a mother who was able to receive this mitochondria replacement is beyond thankful for the treatment in giving her a healthy daughter

Punishments on Animal Cruelty Everyday, every second that passes by, animals across the globe are mistreated in their so-called “home”. Stop animal abuse! Abusers of animal are five times as likely to harm humans. Nearly half of the time victims who stay in violent households do so because they are afraid for their own animals. Countless more never leave the home for their very reason. This issue should be further looked into by identifying states with poorly laws against animal abuse, the

Animal testing has been prominent throughout history, with controversy always riding its tail. Is animal testing morally okay? This one question sits at the back of everyone's mind when broaching the subject, because on one hand, the thought of a living creature in pain by the hands of a human would make any empath squirm. Then on the other, where would we be without animal testing? It has shaped our society today, and hypothetically, could you really tell a child dying of cancer that there is no

to the strict obedience to values, regardless of the consequences. Ethical choices taken with this point of view also had to be universally valid to other kinds of similar situations. The impact of such moral philosophy is predominant in the Australian Association of Social Worker’s (AASW), Code of Ethics which prioritizes principles such as ‘respect for persons’ and client self-determination (Banks, 2004). “Bentham’s (1789) ethical philosophy was founded on the assumption that it is the consequences