Problem Of Evil For An Atheist Essay

blackboard, when someone decides to prove something or someone, then that means there is certainty and assurance that thing is absolutely true. The truth of the matter is that we cannot prove one hundred percent of the existence of God and that is why an Atheist like McCloskey would say that without evidence then there is no God. McCloskey try’s his best to scientifically prove that the creation of

why isn’t evil eliminated out of the world? This raises the question of impossibility that we will be discussing next That the existence of any evil proves it is logically impossible for a Perfect being to exist Thinking that God can do anything raises the question of impossibility. The main atheist argument goes back to “if there were a God, there would be no evil in the world, there is evil, therefore there is no God” (dumm pg263). This was considered a valid argument that the atheists had. However

In McCloskey’s (1968) article “On Being an Atheist”, the arguments for the existence of God are rebutted and some compelling reasons are given in order to enlighten some other atheists who might be struggling to defend their beliefs. Firstly, McCloskey (1968) opens his discussion by asserting that the three main proofs (teleological, cosmological, and argument from design) of God’s existence are not the basic nor the right proofs with which to arrive at a “vague” (p.51) conclusion that states the

cosmological argument does not necessarily make an argument for God’s existence. This particular argument leads us to a first cause. It is simply saying that everything that exists needs a cause. According to Manis and Evans, God is not a contingent being. Atheists argue that everything has a cause or an origin but if God had an Origin then he wouldn’t be God. The cosmological argument is not an end all prove all to the existence of God it is merely an argument that pushes us to go deeper and to study God and

Evil, a “thing” we all fear that comes in many shapes and sizes, the most malevolent “being” in the universe. Why is it here, why does it exist? We can all give examples of evil actions, people, things, and places that we as a society believe are truly evil, but it is important to understand where did we conceived these ideas. Theodicy is defined as the many different views on the existence of evil, but we must go more in depth in order to correctly define what is good and bad. Evil is known to be

"The Root of All Evil" is a documentary shadowing Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist who believes religion could potentially be, as the title states, the root of all evil. Dawkins begins his documentary by outlining his belief that religion is a malevolent virus that draws its followers to commit violent acts in order to please various gods. Dawkins claims that religious people are determined to "kill you and me, and themselves" due to faith, the idea that Dawkins sees as rather absurd. During

McCloskey in his article, "On Being An Atheist" claims that proofs or arguments which theists provide to support their belief “have no weight”. He speaks of this primarily in relation to the ontological argument, the argument which attempts to show that the very concept of God implies his reality. McCloskey believes that there is no point in debating on this particular proof because it has no bearing but the ontological argument serves as the very foundation for other arguments which supports and

Choices, There is Good and There is Evil The first time I read the novel “The Shack,” I immediately empathized with the main character. The story is about a little girl who was abducted from a camping site and found murdered. Its main story line follows the emotional roller coaster of her father, Mack. Not to give the entire story away, I will not discuss exactly what Mack experienced. However, losing his daughter filled him with so much pain and anger. Mack could not understand how this could happen

the Problem of Evil that Leibniz focused on were the Underachiever Problem (Slacker God) and the Holiness Problem (Bastard God). The former focused on the idea that if God is infinitely omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, then he would create the best world possible. The best of all worlds would not include evil because God is infinitely omnibenevolent and would never cause evil. The Problem of Evil arises when we look at the world around us and notice that there is not only human evil but

justifiable? Can the existence of the Christian God be proven by empirical standards or is faith alone a reasonable and logical way of proving its existence? The arguments produced by theists are not exempt from critique, though the arguments produced by atheists are not exempt either. Both sides in this persistent topic deserve an in-depth analysis. The existence of Yahweh (or any particular deity) requires one to look at each side and the information presented. Neutrality must be taken into consideration