Sammo Hung

proven guilty. The jury must decide "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the defendant is guilty. 10. The verdict must be unanimous. Anything other than a unanimous conclusion on the part of the jury—either guilty or not guilty—will result in a "hung jury." If and when the jury announces that it cannot reach a unanimous decision, the judge will declare the trial to be ended. At that time, the state prosecutor can decide to retry the case with a completely new jury. 11. At the time this film

Case Background: In this case it explains what was going on through the movie “Twelve Anger Men” and then it explains the group-thinking. The Group-thinking theory from its beginning had been the most cited endowment to the decision-making study. It focused on 7 factors given by Mitchel and Eckstein which were cohesiveness, insulation, lack of a tradition of impartial leadership, lack of norms requiring methodical procedures, homogeneity of social background and ideology, high stress from external

can be accurately and summarily described. In the movie, the jury has to come to a unanimous decision on the boy’s innocence or guilt as stated by the judge in the beginning of the film and that any decision that is not unanimous will result in a hung jury where they will most likely schedule for a retrial. While most of the characters of the jury seem adamant about the eventual result of the kid and how his fate should pan out, juror number 8 decides that he is going to vote for not guilty in

ED Begley Ultimately shunned by the others, because of his loudmouth, narrow-minded bigot, extremely rude and often interrupt people. Someone who feels that there will be no good outcome, this is a type of man he is. Lastly he was ordered by jury's 4 to "sit down" and to "not open his loudmouth again Gorge Voskovec Jury's 11 that jury's 11 have conscientiousness personality, he always pay intention in every detail, for example when he asking the question 'why that kid go back home after 3 o'clock'

In this lifetime, we will make decisions that affect our careers, our families, and countless other important ingredients in our everyday lives. In making these decisions, there should be some measure of doubt, to keep reality in check. But certainty leads to confidence, and the overall ability to make decisions and form opinions. This is why one should be certain, but use doubt to rationalize decisions and opinions. An example of this relationship occurs in the court systems. Usually, there are

Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose is one of the only literary pieces that reveals the dark truth of America post-WWII. This is a play depicting a jury of twelve white men deciding if a sixteen-year old defendant is guilty of the murder of his own father. In addition, knowledge versus ignorance is the strongest theme in Twelve Angry Men. Rose uses a set of character foils with static characters, a specific time and place, and the archetype of darkness versus light to convey this idea. Effectively

1. Essentially when I hear a juror, I think of the movie “12 Angry Men.” This movie involved a jury of 12 that had to reach a unanimous decision in a murder trial. With that said, the primary function of a jury is to basically hear the evidence on the defendant’s side then they will determine if without a reasonable doubt the criminal offense on the individual is appropriate. Furthermore, the jury will then decide amongst themselves to come to a conclusion whether the accused is guilty or not.

12 Angry Men is an example of the role cinematography can play in creating the atmosphere of a film. This film is set almost entirely in one room, but is still able to construct extreme tension like few other films have been able to do. It establishes this partly through the brilliant dialogue and fiery performances of its twelve actors, but also through powerful use of cinematography that helps in creating the gradually-festering atmosphere of the film. The opening scene of 12 Angry Men is a low-angle

Angry Men Everybody on this earth is unique unto themselves. Think about it! Each individual has their own personality, agenda, and history, the same is true of the characters portrayed in 12 Angry Men. Roger Ebert, an American film critic for The Chicago Sun-Times says, the movie 12 Angry Men was the first of forty-three films in the career of director Sidney Lament, who often sought controversial issues (Ebert). This movie focuses on a jury’s deliberation in a capital murder case, where a guilty

In the filmed “12 Angry Men” all the jurors had to make a decision on whether or not the young boy will be guilty or not guilty. In the textbook Group Dynamics by Donelson R. Forsyth, chapter 11 is about decision making. The author states that “a functional theory of group decision making suggest that groups engage in a sequence of activities and operations as they move from uncertainty to decisional conviction and that each step in the series serves some purpose (p.359).” The jurors all went around