Soul Food Essay

makes a number of claims regarding the existence and nature of the afterlife, and the immortality and reincarnation of the soul that can be compared and contrasted with other religious beliefs. I will be contrasting and comparing Socrates beliefs with those that practice Judaism. Phaedo – the existence and nature of the afterlife and the immortality and reincarnation of the soul The philosophy discussed in the Phaedo revolves around Socrates discussion of the existence and nature of the afterlife.

In the Republic, Plato has Socrates argue that the soul is not simple, rather, its complex and composed of parts. He makes this assertion by first claiming that: “The same thing cannot undergo contraries at the same time, in the same respect, and within the same part.”. For example, something cannot be hot and cold or good and evil at the same time. Socrates posits this as the crux of his argument“let us proceed on this assumption, with the understanding that, if we ever come to think otherwise,

Descartes states that he believes in God and in the soul and nothing that does not arise from these two things. Descartes states that he has, “Observed certain laws established in nature by God in such a manner, and of which he has impressed on our

about how the soul has three parts, is indeed a valid and true argument. Socrates begins to define individual justice, to start, Socrates introduces “parts” of the soul. His argument consists of three parts of the soul, the appetite, reason and spirit. The first part of the soul, the appetite aspect consists of food, sex, drinks and money. The second part of the soul, reason, is the idea of resisting the urge of greed, in other words, the complete opposite of the first part of the soul. Finally, the

characteristics of cities, escalates into a discussion about the souls of individuals. Socrates starts out by offering an agreement to the fact that since cities are made of individuals, their characteristics can also be found in individuals. From his writings, Plato exemplifies most of Socrates’ arguments towards the development of his own arguments. One very famous theory developed by Plato from

distancing themselves from desires such as food, drink, and sex. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are separated. If one wanted to observe one’s soul, then one would need to get rid of one’s body. The first argument for the immorality of the soul is that life and death are opposites. Since they are opposites, they also come from each other. The following quote delivers the message that life and death are in a constant cycle of rebirth, meaning that “... souls do exist there, they go there from

Aristotle’s On the Soul 2.2-2.4, he states "It is now clear that a single definition can be given of the soul only in the same sense as one can be given of figure". In this statement, it is imperative to realize that by “figure” he literally means a geometric figure. This being said, he uses the triangle as the “base figure” for what a soul builds upon. He relates a single triangle to the nutritive soul. This soul is the most basic soul, the nutritive soul. The nutritive soul can grow, decay, nurture

Muslims and Christians similarly believe that, after death, souls go to either heaven or hell. However, the two religions have different ideas about what will happen once the soul is presented before God on the day of Judgment. To Christians, death is a transit from earthly life to God. Many of them think of the soul as an immortal entity within us that goes on living after death. Christians think that by dying, it corrupts the body, but the soul survives (Cummins, 1991). There are straightforwardly dualistic

with a given issue and know which way to steer because of their moral compass. Furthermore, the moral compass is the soul that guides the personal self, but it is also the non-material aspect of a human being that is immortal. Although, the soul’s existence is in question, there is evidence that validates that the soul is real. Such evidence includes Plato’s theory of the tripartite soul and Sigmund Freud’s psychodynamic theory, which reevaluates Plato’s theory. Both address that the soul’s existence

they must be able to exist independently as they must not be the same thing. Leibniz' Law supports the argument and shows that the mind and body are not the same because they do not have all of the same properties. "We cannot conceive of half a soul, as we can in the case of any body, however small." The mind has lots of feelings and idea, but they are all intertwined into one indivisible mind. However, if this is said, then cannot we say the same for the body, that the body and mind, different