preview

A Level Four Autonomous Vehicles

Better Essays

As the prevalence of autonomous vehicles finds itself becoming an everyday reality of society, the legal system finds itself almost at loss and needing to adapt in order to keep up with the rapidly changing technology. National Highway Safety Traffic Administration (NHSTA) describes a level 4 autonomous vehicle as having ‘Full self-driving automation’, which is defined as ‘The vehicle is designed to perform all safety-critical driving functions and monitor roadway conditions for an entire trip.’. Therefore, the driver is not required to monitor the roads however, it is predicted that the driver will offer a destination but the vehicle will be entirely in control including safety operations. Currently, the most common cars on the roads are …show more content…

Hart essentially believes no one should be punished for something for which there is no law for, and currently there is no legislature in place to regulate the usage of level 4 vehicles. Hart’s reasoning is that even if the legal system presents the law as if it were morally binding, it truly does not have to be. The law can impose and enforce obligation to do something or to refrain from doing it and the subject is required to set aside their own view of merits and comply. Hart might say that Vest was obliged to follow the drink driving laws but he did not have a legal obligation to do so. Hart is very particular about his definitions and separation of the ideas of being obliged and being obligated. To be obliged tends to carry the tone about beliefs and motives with which an action is done, so Vest could be obliged to follow the drink driving laws because he believes that he may encounter a consequence or physical harm if he did not, perhaps because of the chance of being in an accident in the event of the vehicle’s controlling computer system failed or was unable to safely proceed on the roadway for any reason. Obligation, however, implies the existence of a rule, and the feeling of non-option whilst being reinforced by social pressure to conform and/or to avoid dangers and threats. Dworkin doubts Hart’s reasoning on obligation as he found it to be applicable to a special class of obligations and requires the existence of conventional practice relying on conformity. Even Dworkin’s interpretation leaves little room for there to be legal obligation upon Vest, as there is a lack of valid rule. However, Dworkin’s reasoning shows little separation between law and morals, and so it could be argued that, from principles, a form of legal obligation could

Get Access