A Perspective on Craig T. Simmons’ “Henry Darcy: Immortalised by his scientific legacy” Craig T. Simmons’ text, “Henry Darcy: Immortalised by his scientific legacy”, is an extract from Simmons’ hydrogeology journal which was written in 2008. It briefly discusses the relevant details of Darcy’s life, then in more depth covers the scientific contributions Darcy made, and finally gives an overview of Darcy’s research later in life. It is an insightful piece of writing with a lengthy compilation of references for further research if desired. Throughout the course of reading it, though, several questions and comments arose in my mind that are worth discussing in this essay – through these I hope to extend the conversation on Darcy as an engineer and person. I will explore what engineering and science possibly meant to Darcy, who affected Darcy’s education and personality, how I can incorporate certain traits of his in my own life, and finally Darcy’s work as an individual. For Darcy, engineering and science can be described as means to give back to the world. Simmons emphasizes his selfless nature on multiple occasions in his journal, explaining that Darcy had “compassion for the poor” and “fairness and dedication to community service” (Simmons). He was said to use his intellect and education to work for the people without gaining any personal benefit. The most definitive example of his selflessness was his waiving of fees for the water system that he designed and built for
Was the criticism of Gov./Col. Sibley justified? Describe what his explanations were and the arguments of those who wanted him to hurry up. Draw a conclusion evaluating which arguments were best.
Finally, Laura and Henry were having a conversation, during which Laura mentioned that she though OUTOCAR deserved to win the competition. during a conversation between Henry and Laura, she mentioned that OUTOCAR should win the competition. Upon hearing this, Henry tried to influence her to change her decision to GUIDEME for his personal interests.
Patrick Henry once stated “Give me liberty or give me death.” In the 18th century, it was the age of reason, which focused on science and reason rather than religion, however still believed in a god. Progress was an important concept at the time. The American Revolution was just beginning when Patrick Henry gave his remarkable speech. Britain was over commanding, selfish, and ignorant; it was time to change that and fight for liberation and justice! Britain was causing loss of jobs for the colonies because of the harsh taxes put on trade. This caused hundreds of thousands of already poor colonists to now go into poverty. Patrick Henry’s pathos in his speech to the Virginia Convention was persuasive because it made the colonists feel further
Throughout the movie “The Good Son” there are many examples of Henry’s mental illness. Because of his aggression towards animals and people, the destruction of property, deceitfulness, and serious rule violations, Henry is diagnosed with Conduct Disorder (CD) (American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12/10/09). Throughout the movie Henry demonstrates all of these characteristics. He shattered windows on an old warehouse by throwing rocks. Henry also shot and killed a dog and showed no remorse in doing so. These actions are unjustifiable to the mind of a normal person, but they are completely normal to Henry.
“GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!” Patrick Henry wrote this to convince his fellow men to take up arms and take action against the British before it was too late. Patrick Henry used an abundance rhetorical devices to convince the House of Burgesses to take up arms. He used rhetorical devices such as: biblical allusions, metaphors, repetition, logos, and others.
Henry Smart seemed to evolve into a man who was remarkably similar to his father. In Doyle’s A Star Called Henry, both Henry and his father committed heinous crimes on behalf of a higher authority, but Henry justified his actions by cloaking himself in the Irish flag. Henry Sr. relied on a wooden leg for both transportation and savage purposes and Henry Jr. adopted his father’s leg both physically and for his own violent agenda. Additionally, Henry Sr.’s staple fashion choice was a coat covered in dirt and blood. Eventually, however, Henry Jr. wore a coat of his own, which too, was coated in the grime of his own maniacal actions. He eventually threw the coat out, suggesting, in the end, that he had become his own man. Thus, while it appeared
Darcy is an abundance of knowledge and is always willing to share it with Gary. “Darcy had a way of telling a yarn- he’d chuckle, he’d shake his head in amazement” pg48. Gary views Darcy as somewhat of a father figure, due to his lack of one. We see during the course of the novel, a strong friendship is formed between Gary and Darcy. Gary feels comfortable to talk to him and be given helpful advice. “Well, young’un all I can say is, do your best”pg51. Darcy is a genuine man, we see this in his maggots selling business. He is true to his word and would never sell somebody short “they pay for fifty they get fifty”pg50. Darcy has great leadership qualities and has had a positive effect to Gary’s during his
His role in the story is to be the overqualified man that overlooks pre existing prejudice about money needed for a marriage, in seek of true love. Because of Mr. Darcy’s prestige and money he is a mere bystander at the beginning of the story, repeatedly acting above his peers. For example after the first ball, the mother of Elizabeth, Mrs Bennett said “‘But I can assure you,’ she added, ‘that Lizzy does not lose much by not suiting his fancy; for he is the most disagreeable, horrid man, not at all worth pleasing. So high and so conceited that there was no enduring him!” (10, Austen) This quote and the character of Darcy as a whole is Austen commenting on the english tradition of|high class men who have their life set because of the power that comes with their money. On the satirical scale, this is Austen being highly judgemental in a negative way about this tradition. But that’s the beauty of the evolution of Darcy’s character. He turns from this classic role into someone who breaks social norms by marrying Elizabeth Bennett. Darcy says himself “But there were other causes of repugnance--Causes which, though still existing, and existing to an equal degree in both instances, I had myself endeavoured to forget, because they were not immediately before me….-- The situation of your mother's family, though objectionable, was nothing in comparison of the want of propriety so frequently.” (169,
How can power overpower the nature of a man? In William Shakespeare’s Henry V, Henry’s life is centered around his kingship which turns him into a selfish and stern king. Throughout his life, Henry has worked hard to prepare himself for becoming the king of England. Moreover, Henry’s childhood consisted of constant preparation for his future career as king. However, when he becomes king he disregards his foolish childhood, and focuses on his own wealth and prosperity. Unfortunately, his selfishness compels him to do wicked things that harm his country. A king’s job is to protect and provide for his kingdom; Henry, however, makes many decisions that harm his kingdom, which makes him a bad king. Moreover, Henry’s childhood preparation for his kingship has led to much harm to the citizens of England. Henry’s position as king transforms him from a foolish young man into a hard, stern king. As king Henry displays attributes of wickedness, selfishness, and ruthlessness.
The year 1776 lives in the minds of many Americans for it was the year the American colonies declared full independence. However, colonists had been engaged in fighting the war against Britain a year before the claim of independence was officially declared. Why, then, were American Colonists fighting and dying months before any sort of formal agreement had been made to detest British rule? Reasoning varies, but a major contributor was that speeches were being delivered to stir up the hearts of future United States citizens into fighting the British. The most well known, and possibly most motivating, speech delivered during this period was by Patrick Henry. His words moved men to action and awoken a willingness to sacrifice life for the
It was a hot blistering summer day not a leaf in sight or a hint of shade to be found. Mouth is dry as cotton from thirst and hands bleeding and blistering from a hard days work, exhausted from fatigue and hunger, because Master had me out here since the crack of dawn. Tending to the crops in the field and told me not come until every last crop has been tended which is about three football fields long. This is some of the Vigorous work that slaves had to endure. Slavery is a big part of American history. Many of the African Americans you see today are descendants of the 500,000 plus Africans who were sent to North America as slaves. To work
Henry would later prove himself as a brave and accomplished leader in the battle of Bosworth using skills he was taught whilst in France in the company of Louis XI. Henry would often hear of talk about Louis’ strengths and weaknesses allowing him to eventually learn from mistakes that Louis made. Henry would also come to understand the importance of military defences as he was accommodated in some of Europe’s most impregnable fortresses. Louis had gained a lot of knowledge about reading opponents whilst in battle and the importance of gathering information, Louis had the belief that money and good finances was more powerful than the sword. He shared all this information with Henry which is made evident in the Battle of Bosworth Henry won partially
Appearances Can Be Deceiving: The Hero in A Farewell To Arms Throughout literature, heroes are faced with challenges they have to overcome through courageous acts. The character of a hero has to follow certain ethical codes created by the society which do not leave any space for the hero to break them. Superficially, the main character in A Farewell To Arms, Frederic Henry, appears to be a traditional hero; however, if we track the character’s actions closely, we can conclude that he is just the opposite of one, or an anti-hero. Henry is portrayed by the author as a self-serving individual whose actions lead him to making quite unorthodox decisions which further reinstate him as an anti-hero.
After realizing that her doll was now alive, Emma wanted to play tag with Samantha. Samantha didn’t want to play tag, but instead she wanted to read her favorite book, Henry and Mudge. Emma agreed that this was an excellent idea, so she went to find the book.
Shakespeare’s Henry V is the invigorating tale of the young English king who conquered France. The play’s episodic structure focuses on the moments of greatest intensity, skipping between bloody battles, political showdowns, and romantic endeavors. Throughout, audiences must question whether Henry is a patriotic king or a sinister actor (Ellis). This duality within the text is illustrated by Henry’s speech at the walls of Harfleur in Act 3, Scene 4. This speech marks Henry’s first victory in his invasion of France and establishes Henry as a brilliant and successful military leader. In his film Henry V, Branagh rejects the interpretation of Henry as a Machiavellian manipulator and instead centralizes moments of intense vulnerability and suffering. Branagh presents Henry as a flawed but sympathetic hero who is learning to be a good leader.