APA Ethical Guidelines Essay

To discuss whether or not the two expert witnesses in the case of Commonwealth of Virginia versus Allen (Va. 2005) acted or behaved unethically, it is important to look at the guidelines and principles of their expertise to determine such. It is essential to revisit or review the APA Code of Ethics and the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (Professionals). From these two guidelines or documents, one can determine the proper or appropriate credentials, assessments, scope, relationships, as well as the “don’ts” covered in this discipline or respect. The documents will reveal or allow an evaluation of each expert witness’s performance or service to the client to be either ethical or unethical.

In module 4 in our book it talks about codes of ethics. The APA guidelines have very similar information. one thing you have to have informed consent from your patient. Second, many people talk about using animals for experiments. Some people think it is unfair to the animals. As long as the psychologist is trained and follows the states and country laws, then they are okay to experiment on animals to find research. They try to give pain medicines and surgeries to keep the animals out of harms way and pain. They don't try to kill the animal. Third, all people that are involved in an experiment has to be voluntary, you can't make somebody be in an experiment. Fourth, psychologist try to maintain confidentiality. Fifth, they try to prevent experimental

In ordinary life, deception is typically justified on the grounds that it is for the benefit for the individual who is being deceived (Miller, 2012). In research work, it is common for research studies that evaluate fundamental aspects of human behavior to use deception while carrying out the research. The use of deception in research wok is usually one of the hardest ethical decisions that researchers are confronted with when conducting research studies. It may involve petty minor omissions of information about the research study to the respondents, or even an outright misinformation about the aim of the study. In most cases, the rationale for deception on fields such as human behavior is that it is not possible to obtain accurate information about how people behave when they know when they know what they are being observed or evaluated for (Bankert and Amdur, 2006). Stanley Milgram, a social psychologist, experiments on obedience to authority figures is a significantly prominent test in the study of the use of deceptions

All psychologists including those in the field of research are obliged to abide by the APA Ethics Code standards. Therefore, I agree that they should be held accountable for manipulations, falsification of data, and plagiarism to favor their studies. These actions violate the various standards of the aforementioned code: 5.01 (Avoidance of False or Deceptive Statements), 8.10 (Reporting Research Results), and 8.11 (Plagiarism). Violations of this kind should be penalized by law as the standards are enforced by law. Psychologist researchers, who discover flaws in their published studies, should take steps to amend their faults by publishing other articles, (APA, 2010).

Human subjects are recruited to participate in a variety of research projects to include clinical trials, experiments, data collection, sampling, surveys, etc. Over time it has come under fire because of the influx of ethical issues associated with human participant research. The American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (hereinafter referred to as the Ethics Code which is made up of 5 principles and 8 standards) provide guidance and serves to protect the public from ethical misconduct, it also serves to guide and protect professionals.

In psychological research, deception takes place when incorrect information is presented to participants and they are not communicated everything about the research therefore they are being misled. For example, the participants could be wrongly deceived about the aim, location, or design of the experiment where the research will be gathered. Even though deception is permitted whilst conducting research, whether it should or should not be used is still the topic in many arguments.

A false explanation of the nature, purpose and goals of the study will be explained to participants in order avoid skewed results. If participants know the intent of the study is to assess deception, they might have a heightened awareness of their deceptive behavior, which might affect their survey responses. Informed consent will be mandatory before acceptance into the study and a research team member will explain that participation is voluntary and withdrawal from the study is allowed at any time. Participants will also be reassured that survey responses will remain confidential and will be given $15 compensation for each survey they complete. Data will be collected by research team members who will administer the surveys in person to the participants.

The American Marketing Association’s (AMA) Statement of Ethics provides a framework for organizations based on the following core ethical values: honesty, responsibility, fairness, respect, transparency, and citizenship. I believe that The Honest Kitchen is a great example of a highly ethical company that embodies every one of these values. The Honest Kitchen sells high-quality, dehydrated food for dogs and cats. They also have several other product lines, including treats and supplements. Their products can be purchased online and at specialty pet food stores that focus on biologically appropriate pet food.

Deception: deception will not be used in this research. Participants will be informed of the research.

1. Competence of psychologist. Employment screening tools should only be carefully selected by a psychologist with understanding and experience in test content, manual, administration, and scoring of the assessment. Psychologist should also inform possible employees of the specifics of the test and confirm the individual fully understands the assessment and their rights.

There are several ethical issues to evaluate when dealing with non-payment of a client. That APA ethical Principles of Psychologist and Code of Conduct deal with informed consent for therapy; the fee structure and the anticipation of payment should be discussed at the time of the initial meeting or early in the development of the therapeutic relationship (APA, 2010). The Code of Conduct also makes reference to client records, the practitioner may not withhold records if they are needed for emergency treatment due to lack of payment (APA, 2010). However, the therapist my disclosure limited information from the client to necessitate collection of delinquent fees (APA,

In the field of psychology researchers have to follow a code of ethics that outlines what is morally right and what is morally wrong. These codes are put in place to protect participant’s rights during the time of the study. Psychologists follow these codes to prevent any deception from happening and to allow a flawless study to be conducted. Low income families trying to get the perfect care for their child needs is very difficult with limited funds that are available to them. During this study to aid those struggling families, researchers will follow the ethical procedures to ensure the full potential of the study.

Farrell further discusses the current struggle between different ethical camps within research fields. The ethics theories discussed are utilitarian, rights, virtues, and principles, and the benefits and drawbacks of each are mentioned briefly. For example, the theory of principles argue that ethical guidelines for human subjects research cannot rely on guidelines alone, but must further involve a desire to act ethically at

The most famous issue that arise when it comes to psychological research which is affect the ethics is deception. What is deception? Research participants are misleading or give fake information about the purpose of the research by the researcher. There are two types of deception, first one

It's often thought that ethics are the moral "way" of life, however, I have wondered if it is merely a pause in the growth of the field of psychology. Research is important to psychologists as it develops theories to a state which could be considerable. However, according to the British psychology, society, researchers must give the participants informed consent, which involves briefing and debriefing. Others confidentiality, deception, and participants must have the right to withdraw. Even though I agree with many of these, it's deception and Informed consent I deem mandatory as without them the research is unreliable. I believe this is the factor that is building a wall to the progression of psychology and I intend to dig to the