preview

Abercrombie And Fitch Case Study

Decent Essays

EEOC vs Abercrombie and Fitch, a case where a practicing Muslim Samantha Elauf, sued the clothing store from discrimination. Although she passed her interview with the store, she was not hired due to head wear that she was wearing. Elauf wears as a part of her observation of her religious practice. Abercrombie policy prohibits head wear and the maintain more of a West Coast California image. Elauf’s claim was disparate treatment from Abercrombie. She was granted $20,000 in the District Court but the 10th Circuit Court reversed that decision. The Supreme Court the appealed and ruled in an 8-1 favor of EEOC. The majority stated that Abercrombie violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, whether they had knowledge or not of her religion, they were still held liable. They concluded that an applicant need not to prove the reason for accommodation based on religious reasons. Justice believed that Abercrombie was aware of Elauf’s religion and illustrated discrimination by failure to accommodate her.

“A concurring opinion is where one or judges agree with the decision of the majority but states a different reason. Justice Thomas opinion concerning this case was that having a …show more content…

These types of occupations operate and make up is very secular in opposite of many of their religious standards. Men or women who apart of a sacred religion shouldn’t seek to work at these types of corporations as it would be very offensive to their beliefs. This is fact where there should be a limit and accommodation should be reluctantly considered. It would almost be impossible to accommodation in these situations without changing the whole nature of the job. In the EEOC case accommodations could have easily been made for Samantha without undue hardship. I believe that there should be limits as all businesses can’t conveniently

Get Access